Loading…
CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal?
[...]the majority of the second-generation DES that were used were the Endeavor ZES, given the timing of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of this stent platform. [...]in the propensity-matched cohort there was no mention of the use of the SYNTAX score to quantify the degree of angiogra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-03, Vol.67 (12), p.1503-1504 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1504 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1503 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Philip, Femi Southard, Jeffrey A. |
description | [...]the majority of the second-generation DES that were used were the Endeavor ZES, given the timing of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of this stent platform. [...]in the propensity-matched cohort there was no mention of the use of the SYNTAX score to quantify the degree of angiographic complexity to determine which revascularization strategy would be best. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.070 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776088518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109716003429</els_id><sourcerecordid>1776088518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e292t-b385290f99b58e18837890435725cc3601bc13dc7caeb5be69b1ff617254686d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkclKxEAQhhtRdFxewIMEvHhJ7EpPbyLIGMYFBMXt2nQ6NdIhM9HuRNCn8Vl8MjMuF09VUB9F1f8Rsgs0AwrisM5q61yWU-AZQEYlXSEj4FyljGu5SkZUMp4C1XKDbMZYU0qFAr1ONnJJIR8DH5FpMTk9Tx4xxD4mN8XlUTIJmEyaJrnFVxtd39jg323n20Vy1wXb4ZPHmBQBh7b6_Ji-9LY52SZrM9tE3PmtW-ThbHpfXKRX1-eXxeQqxVznXVoyxXNNZ1qXXCEoxaTSdMy4zLlzTFAoHbDKSWex5CUKXcJsJmAYj4USFdsiBz97n0P70mPszNxHh01jF9j20YCUgirFQQ3o_j-0bvuwGK77poTmSsJA7f1SfTnHyjwHP7fhzfwFNADHPwAOb716DCY6jwuHlQ_oOlO13gA1Sx-mNksfZunDAJjBB_sCu696YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776695871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal?</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Philip, Femi ; Southard, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Philip, Femi ; Southard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the majority of the second-generation DES that were used were the Endeavor ZES, given the timing of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of this stent platform. [...]in the propensity-matched cohort there was no mention of the use of the SYNTAX score to quantify the degree of angiographic complexity to determine which revascularization strategy would be best.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27012415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Angina pectoris ; Cardiology ; Coronary Artery Bypass - trends ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Coronary vessels ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mortality ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - trends ; Stents ; Surgery ; Thrombosis ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-03, Vol.67 (12), p.1503-1504</ispartof><rights>2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 29, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27012415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Philip, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><title>CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal?</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>[...]the majority of the second-generation DES that were used were the Endeavor ZES, given the timing of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of this stent platform. [...]in the propensity-matched cohort there was no mention of the use of the SYNTAX score to quantify the degree of angiographic complexity to determine which revascularization strategy would be best.</description><subject>Angina pectoris</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - trends</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - trends</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkclKxEAQhhtRdFxewIMEvHhJ7EpPbyLIGMYFBMXt2nQ6NdIhM9HuRNCn8Vl8MjMuF09VUB9F1f8Rsgs0AwrisM5q61yWU-AZQEYlXSEj4FyljGu5SkZUMp4C1XKDbMZYU0qFAr1ONnJJIR8DH5FpMTk9Tx4xxD4mN8XlUTIJmEyaJrnFVxtd39jg323n20Vy1wXb4ZPHmBQBh7b6_Ji-9LY52SZrM9tE3PmtW-ThbHpfXKRX1-eXxeQqxVznXVoyxXNNZ1qXXCEoxaTSdMy4zLlzTFAoHbDKSWex5CUKXcJsJmAYj4USFdsiBz97n0P70mPszNxHh01jF9j20YCUgirFQQ3o_j-0bvuwGK77poTmSsJA7f1SfTnHyjwHP7fhzfwFNADHPwAOb716DCY6jwuHlQ_oOlO13gA1Sx-mNksfZunDAJjBB_sCu696YQ</recordid><startdate>20160329</startdate><enddate>20160329</enddate><creator>Philip, Femi</creator><creator>Southard, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160329</creationdate><title>CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal?</title><author>Philip, Femi ; Southard, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e292t-b385290f99b58e18837890435725cc3601bc13dc7caeb5be69b1ff617254686d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Angina pectoris</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - trends</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - trends</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Philip, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Philip, Femi</au><au>Southard, Jeffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-03-29</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1503</spage><epage>1504</epage><pages>1503-1504</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>[...]the majority of the second-generation DES that were used were the Endeavor ZES, given the timing of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of this stent platform. [...]in the propensity-matched cohort there was no mention of the use of the SYNTAX score to quantify the degree of angiographic complexity to determine which revascularization strategy would be best.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27012415</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.070</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-03, Vol.67 (12), p.1503-1504 |
issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776088518 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS |
subjects | Angina pectoris Cardiology Coronary Artery Bypass - trends Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis Coronary Artery Disease - surgery Coronary vessels Female Humans Male Mortality Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - trends Stents Surgery Thrombosis Veins & arteries |
title | CABG Versus PCI: Are All Revascularization Strategies Created Equal? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CABG%20Versus%20PCI:%20Are%20All%20Revascularization%20Strategies%20Created%C2%A0Equal?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Philip,%20Femi&rft.date=2016-03-29&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1503&rft.epage=1504&rft.pages=1503-1504&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1776088518%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e292t-b385290f99b58e18837890435725cc3601bc13dc7caeb5be69b1ff617254686d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776695871&rft_id=info:pmid/27012415&rfr_iscdi=true |