Plio–Pleistocene drilling predation in Florida bivalves: Predator identity, competition, and biotic change

• Published in: Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 2014-06, Vol.404, p.67-77
• Main Authors: Paul, Shubhabrata, Herbert, Gregory S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chione; Gastropoda; Muricidae; Naticidae; Pleistocene; Pliocene
• ISSN: 0031-0182; 1872-616X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.03.040

Identifying gastropod predators from the morphology of their drill hole traces is an important step in testing the disruptive effects of prey evolution on the prey size selectivity behaviors of predators. For bulk sampled bivalves of the genus Chione from the late Neogene of Florida, temporal patterns of prey size selectivity differ depending on whether drill holes from naticid and muricid gastropods are lumped together or separated. When drill hole producers are identified to family level using revised experimental criteria developed specifically for this study system, we find that naticid and muricid prey size selectivity responds in different directions and at different times, but both groups exhibit change in prey size selectivity beginning around 2.5Ma. We reject previous conclusions that changes in drilling gastropod prey handling behaviors were driven by changes in prey morphology associated with a species turnover event at 1.8Ma. Prey density, threats from enemies, and habitat structure were also changing throughout the study interval, but none of these factors alone provides a complete explanation for observed changes in predator behaviors for either family. We conclude that multiple factors drive predator behavioral change, and that different predator types have different sensitivities to these factors. •Bivalve prey, Chione, were collected from bulk samples of the late Neogene Florida•Muricid and Naticid drill hole traces are identified following revised experimental criteria.•Prey size selectivity of these two predator groups shows different temporal trends.•Previous hypotheses of prey turnover cannot adequately explain observed trends.