Loading…
Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome....
Saved in:
Published in: | Obesity reviews 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3 |
container_end_page | 141 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 126 |
container_title | Obesity reviews |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Marek, R. J Ben‐Porath, Y. S Heinberg, L. J |
description | Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/obr.12356 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760870631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctu1DAUBmALgeiNBS8AkdiURVpf4kuW7YgOqFUrlRnBznLikxmXTDy1E7V5-xrSzgIJCW_sxXd-6fdB6D3BJySdU1-FE0IZF6_QPimEzKUqf77evRXZQwcx3mFMZMnIW7RHhVQMC7mP5svOQoi96azrVlm_hiz4FjLfZNs41mu_Nf3at341Zq7LKhOc6YOrsziEFYQx80Nf-w3EI_SmMW2Ed8_3IVpefFnMvuZXN_Nvs7OrvC4KJXLJrFSWFwC2MVaxhjJcAqmwpVwUuKhKSYXioFRDORhmKmLK0tLKYEWVaNghOp5yt8HfDxB7vXGxhrY1HfghaiKlEFxSXv4HFVhJLBhJ9NNf9M4PoUtFkuJSEcJKntTnSdXBxxig0dvgNiaMmmD9exE6LUL_WUSyH54Th2oDdidffj6B0wk8uBbGfyfpm_Pbl8h8mnCxh8fdhAm_dMqTXP-4nmt8ubidLeaXmib_cfKN8dqsgot6-Z1iIjBOvVNz9gQqX6l7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757811395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><description>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.12356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26783067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Pub</publisher><subject>anxiety ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Assessment ; bariatric surgery ; Bariatric Surgery - methods ; Bariatric Surgery - psychology ; Comorbidity ; Contraindications ; Depression - diagnosis ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Humans ; obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - psychology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; outcome ; patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Psychopathology ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141</ispartof><rights>2015 World Obesity</rights><rights>2015 World Obesity.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 World Obesity</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><description>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</description><subject>anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>bariatric surgery</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0ctu1DAUBmALgeiNBS8AkdiURVpf4kuW7YgOqFUrlRnBznLikxmXTDy1E7V5-xrSzgIJCW_sxXd-6fdB6D3BJySdU1-FE0IZF6_QPimEzKUqf77evRXZQwcx3mFMZMnIW7RHhVQMC7mP5svOQoi96azrVlm_hiz4FjLfZNs41mu_Nf3at341Zq7LKhOc6YOrsziEFYQx80Nf-w3EI_SmMW2Ed8_3IVpefFnMvuZXN_Nvs7OrvC4KJXLJrFSWFwC2MVaxhjJcAqmwpVwUuKhKSYXioFRDORhmKmLK0tLKYEWVaNghOp5yt8HfDxB7vXGxhrY1HfghaiKlEFxSXv4HFVhJLBhJ9NNf9M4PoUtFkuJSEcJKntTnSdXBxxig0dvgNiaMmmD9exE6LUL_WUSyH54Th2oDdidffj6B0wk8uBbGfyfpm_Pbl8h8mnCxh8fdhAm_dMqTXP-4nmt8ubidLeaXmib_cfKN8dqsgot6-Z1iIjBOvVNz9gQqX6l7</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Marek, R. J</creator><creator>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creator><creator>Heinberg, L. J</creator><general>Blackwell Pub</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><author>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>bariatric surgery</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marek, R. J</au><au>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</au><au>Heinberg, L. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>126-141</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Pub</pub><pmid>26783067</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.12356</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-7881 |
ispartof | Obesity reviews, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141 |
issn | 1467-7881 1467-789X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657259 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | anxiety Anxiety - diagnosis Assessment bariatric surgery Bariatric Surgery - methods Bariatric Surgery - psychology Comorbidity Contraindications Depression - diagnosis Feeding Behavior - psychology Humans obesity Obesity, Morbid - psychology Obesity, Morbid - surgery outcome patients Predictive Value of Tests Preoperative Care - methods Psychopathology Treatment Outcome Weight Loss |
title | Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20role%20of%20psychopathology%20in%20bariatric%20surgery%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Marek,%20R.%20J&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=126-141&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.12356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760870631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757811395&rft_id=info:pmid/26783067&rfr_iscdi=true |