Loading…

Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity reviews 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141
Main Authors: Marek, R. J, Ben‐Porath, Y. S, Heinberg, L. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 126
container_title Obesity reviews
container_volume 17
creator Marek, R. J
Ben‐Porath, Y. S
Heinberg, L. J
description Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/obr.12356
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760870631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctu1DAUBmALgeiNBS8AkdiURVpf4kuW7YgOqFUrlRnBznLikxmXTDy1E7V5-xrSzgIJCW_sxXd-6fdB6D3BJySdU1-FE0IZF6_QPimEzKUqf77evRXZQwcx3mFMZMnIW7RHhVQMC7mP5svOQoi96azrVlm_hiz4FjLfZNs41mu_Nf3at341Zq7LKhOc6YOrsziEFYQx80Nf-w3EI_SmMW2Ed8_3IVpefFnMvuZXN_Nvs7OrvC4KJXLJrFSWFwC2MVaxhjJcAqmwpVwUuKhKSYXioFRDORhmKmLK0tLKYEWVaNghOp5yt8HfDxB7vXGxhrY1HfghaiKlEFxSXv4HFVhJLBhJ9NNf9M4PoUtFkuJSEcJKntTnSdXBxxig0dvgNiaMmmD9exE6LUL_WUSyH54Th2oDdidffj6B0wk8uBbGfyfpm_Pbl8h8mnCxh8fdhAm_dMqTXP-4nmt8ubidLeaXmib_cfKN8dqsgot6-Z1iIjBOvVNz9gQqX6l7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757811395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><description>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.12356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26783067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Pub</publisher><subject>anxiety ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Assessment ; bariatric surgery ; Bariatric Surgery - methods ; Bariatric Surgery - psychology ; Comorbidity ; Contraindications ; Depression - diagnosis ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Humans ; obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - psychology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; outcome ; patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Psychopathology ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141</ispartof><rights>2015 World Obesity</rights><rights>2015 World Obesity.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 World Obesity</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26783067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><description>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</description><subject>anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>bariatric surgery</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0ctu1DAUBmALgeiNBS8AkdiURVpf4kuW7YgOqFUrlRnBznLikxmXTDy1E7V5-xrSzgIJCW_sxXd-6fdB6D3BJySdU1-FE0IZF6_QPimEzKUqf77evRXZQwcx3mFMZMnIW7RHhVQMC7mP5svOQoi96azrVlm_hiz4FjLfZNs41mu_Nf3at341Zq7LKhOc6YOrsziEFYQx80Nf-w3EI_SmMW2Ed8_3IVpefFnMvuZXN_Nvs7OrvC4KJXLJrFSWFwC2MVaxhjJcAqmwpVwUuKhKSYXioFRDORhmKmLK0tLKYEWVaNghOp5yt8HfDxB7vXGxhrY1HfghaiKlEFxSXv4HFVhJLBhJ9NNf9M4PoUtFkuJSEcJKntTnSdXBxxig0dvgNiaMmmD9exE6LUL_WUSyH54Th2oDdidffj6B0wk8uBbGfyfpm_Pbl8h8mnCxh8fdhAm_dMqTXP-4nmt8ubidLeaXmib_cfKN8dqsgot6-Z1iIjBOvVNz9gQqX6l7</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Marek, R. J</creator><creator>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creator><creator>Heinberg, L. J</creator><general>Blackwell Pub</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</title><author>Marek, R. J ; Ben‐Porath, Y. S ; Heinberg, L. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>bariatric surgery</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marek, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinberg, L. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marek, R. J</au><au>Ben‐Porath, Y. S</au><au>Heinberg, L. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>126-141</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity; however, a subset of patients who undergo this procedure regain weight or achieve suboptimal weight loss results. A large number of studies have examined whether psychological variables play a role in weight loss surgery outcome. Although presurgical psychopathology has been found to be associated with suboptimal results in some studies, this literature is equivocal. These inconsistent findings are reviewed and considered in the context of contemporary models of psychopathology. More specifically, the review focuses on the limitations of atheoretical, descriptive diagnostic systems and examines whether comorbidity within the mood/anxiety disorders, impulse control/substance use disorders and thought disorders can account for the inconsistent findings reported to date. Contemporary models of psychopathology are highlighted and linked to the Research Domain Criteria, which have been advanced by the National Institute of Health. Means for assessing psychological constructs congruent with these models are reviewed. Recommendations are made for standardizing approaches to investigating how psychopathology contributes to suboptimal bariatric surgery outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Pub</pub><pmid>26783067</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.12356</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-0951</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-7881
ispartof Obesity reviews, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.126-141
issn 1467-7881
1467-789X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657259
source Wiley
subjects anxiety
Anxiety - diagnosis
Assessment
bariatric surgery
Bariatric Surgery - methods
Bariatric Surgery - psychology
Comorbidity
Contraindications
Depression - diagnosis
Feeding Behavior - psychology
Humans
obesity
Obesity, Morbid - psychology
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
outcome
patients
Predictive Value of Tests
Preoperative Care - methods
Psychopathology
Treatment Outcome
Weight Loss
title Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20role%20of%20psychopathology%20in%20bariatric%20surgery%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Marek,%20R.%20J&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=126-141&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.12356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760870631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-73d78d54eedfad83f2309e1b0d256404b972685e88f25ea3ab1a99d2ba08286f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757811395&rft_id=info:pmid/26783067&rfr_iscdi=true