Loading…

Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity

Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439
Main Authors: Ginsberg, Gary, Smolenski, Susan, Hattis, Dale, Guyton, Kathryn Z., Johns, Douglas O., Sonawane, Babasaheb
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3
container_end_page 439
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 389
container_title Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews
container_volume 12
creator Ginsberg, Gary
Smolenski, Susan
Hattis, Dale
Guyton, Kathryn Z.
Johns, Douglas O.
Sonawane, Babasaheb
description Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10937400903158375
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777133512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34977629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl1vFCEUhonR2Lr6A7wxxAutiaN8DDA0vWm2uprU2MT1esIA07KZgRUYdf69tFu9sMmWhHDIed43cM4B4DlG7zBq0HuMJBU1QhJRzBoq2ANwiBnBFZcMPSxxyVcFqA_Ak5Q2qCwmm8fggCDcUEaaQzCvrLfZaXgRhnkMcXvl0gidh6thyipfueAtXEflU2-jSjbBo9W39Zvjwm-nQeWSh2cu5ei66eYSeliAL_gtXJetvIEXGC6D30yXhfaX8FRn99Pl-Sl41Ksh2We35wJ8__hhvfxUnX9dfV6enleaEZorYpjRrFcMW91rSRjnnTaCc6JM09VGaW1lYwhFzHJKe2lqarTQGlnGtejoArze-W5j-DHZlNvRJW2HQXkbptQKSjnBshRkAV7tJWktheBE3gsSTHBT2lLAo70gFkJgShkmBX35H7oJU_SlMq3gSLIG0-sX4h2kY0gp2r7dRjeqOLcYtdcj0d4ZiaJ5cWs8daM1_xR_Z6AAJzvA-T7EUf0KcTBtVvMQYl86r135-j5_ca_8jqrNvzP9AyAA1RM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760958138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</creator><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><description>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-6950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10937400903158375</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20183528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Animals ; Assessments ; Computer simulation ; Conjugation ; Enzymes ; Genetics, Population ; Genotype ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Glutathione ; Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics ; Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism ; Glutathione Transferase - genetics ; Glutathione Transferase - metabolism ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Phenotype ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Population genetics ; Solvents ; Xenobiotics - metabolism ; Xenobiotics - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20183528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattis, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><title>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</title><addtitle>J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev</addtitle><description>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conjugation</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Glutathione</subject><subject>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics</subject><subject>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism</subject><subject>Glutathione Transferase - genetics</subject><subject>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Xenobiotics - metabolism</subject><subject>Xenobiotics - toxicity</subject><issn>1093-7404</issn><issn>1521-6950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkl1vFCEUhonR2Lr6A7wxxAutiaN8DDA0vWm2uprU2MT1esIA07KZgRUYdf69tFu9sMmWhHDIed43cM4B4DlG7zBq0HuMJBU1QhJRzBoq2ANwiBnBFZcMPSxxyVcFqA_Ak5Q2qCwmm8fggCDcUEaaQzCvrLfZaXgRhnkMcXvl0gidh6thyipfueAtXEflU2-jSjbBo9W39Zvjwm-nQeWSh2cu5ei66eYSeliAL_gtXJetvIEXGC6D30yXhfaX8FRn99Pl-Sl41Ksh2We35wJ8__hhvfxUnX9dfV6enleaEZorYpjRrFcMW91rSRjnnTaCc6JM09VGaW1lYwhFzHJKe2lqarTQGlnGtejoArze-W5j-DHZlNvRJW2HQXkbptQKSjnBshRkAV7tJWktheBE3gsSTHBT2lLAo70gFkJgShkmBX35H7oJU_SlMq3gSLIG0-sX4h2kY0gp2r7dRjeqOLcYtdcj0d4ZiaJ5cWs8daM1_xR_Z6AAJzvA-T7EUf0KcTBtVvMQYl86r135-j5_ca_8jqrNvzP9AyAA1RM</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Ginsberg, Gary</creator><creator>Smolenski, Susan</creator><creator>Hattis, Dale</creator><creator>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creator><creator>Johns, Douglas O.</creator><creator>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><author>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conjugation</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Glutathione</topic><topic>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics</topic><topic>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism</topic><topic>Glutathione Transferase - genetics</topic><topic>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Xenobiotics - metabolism</topic><topic>Xenobiotics - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattis, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ginsberg, Gary</au><au>Smolenski, Susan</au><au>Hattis, Dale</au><au>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</au><au>Johns, Douglas O.</au><au>Sonawane, Babasaheb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</jtitle><addtitle>J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev</addtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>389-439</pages><issn>1093-7404</issn><eissn>1521-6950</eissn><abstract>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>20183528</pmid><doi>10.1080/10937400903158375</doi><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-7404
ispartof Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439
issn 1093-7404
1521-6950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777133512
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)
subjects Animals
Assessments
Computer simulation
Conjugation
Enzymes
Genetics, Population
Genotype
Genotype & phenotype
Glutathione
Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics
Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism
Glutathione Transferase - genetics
Glutathione Transferase - metabolism
Humans
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Phenotype
Polymorphism
Polymorphism, Genetic
Population genetics
Solvents
Xenobiotics - metabolism
Xenobiotics - toxicity
title Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A30%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20Polymorphism%20in%20Glutathione%20Transferases%20(GST):%20Population%20Distribution%20of%20GSTM1,%20T1,%20and%20P1%20Conjugating%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20toxicology%20and%20environmental%20health.%20Part%20B,%20Critical%20reviews&rft.au=Ginsberg,%20Gary&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=389-439&rft.issn=1093-7404&rft.eissn=1521-6950&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10937400903158375&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E34977629%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760958138&rft_id=info:pmid/20183528&rfr_iscdi=true