Loading…
Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity
Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3 |
container_end_page | 439 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Ginsberg, Gary Smolenski, Susan Hattis, Dale Guyton, Kathryn Z. Johns, Douglas O. Sonawane, Babasaheb |
description | Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10937400903158375 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777133512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34977629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl1vFCEUhonR2Lr6A7wxxAutiaN8DDA0vWm2uprU2MT1esIA07KZgRUYdf69tFu9sMmWhHDIed43cM4B4DlG7zBq0HuMJBU1QhJRzBoq2ANwiBnBFZcMPSxxyVcFqA_Ak5Q2qCwmm8fggCDcUEaaQzCvrLfZaXgRhnkMcXvl0gidh6thyipfueAtXEflU2-jSjbBo9W39Zvjwm-nQeWSh2cu5ei66eYSeliAL_gtXJetvIEXGC6D30yXhfaX8FRn99Pl-Sl41Ksh2We35wJ8__hhvfxUnX9dfV6enleaEZorYpjRrFcMW91rSRjnnTaCc6JM09VGaW1lYwhFzHJKe2lqarTQGlnGtejoArze-W5j-DHZlNvRJW2HQXkbptQKSjnBshRkAV7tJWktheBE3gsSTHBT2lLAo70gFkJgShkmBX35H7oJU_SlMq3gSLIG0-sX4h2kY0gp2r7dRjeqOLcYtdcj0d4ZiaJ5cWs8daM1_xR_Z6AAJzvA-T7EUf0KcTBtVvMQYl86r135-j5_ca_8jqrNvzP9AyAA1RM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760958138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</creator><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><description>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-6950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10937400903158375</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20183528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Animals ; Assessments ; Computer simulation ; Conjugation ; Enzymes ; Genetics, Population ; Genotype ; Genotype & phenotype ; Glutathione ; Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics ; Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism ; Glutathione Transferase - genetics ; Glutathione Transferase - metabolism ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Phenotype ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Population genetics ; Solvents ; Xenobiotics - metabolism ; Xenobiotics - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20183528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattis, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><title>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</title><addtitle>J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev</addtitle><description>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conjugation</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Glutathione</subject><subject>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics</subject><subject>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism</subject><subject>Glutathione Transferase - genetics</subject><subject>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Xenobiotics - metabolism</subject><subject>Xenobiotics - toxicity</subject><issn>1093-7404</issn><issn>1521-6950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkl1vFCEUhonR2Lr6A7wxxAutiaN8DDA0vWm2uprU2MT1esIA07KZgRUYdf69tFu9sMmWhHDIed43cM4B4DlG7zBq0HuMJBU1QhJRzBoq2ANwiBnBFZcMPSxxyVcFqA_Ak5Q2qCwmm8fggCDcUEaaQzCvrLfZaXgRhnkMcXvl0gidh6thyipfueAtXEflU2-jSjbBo9W39Zvjwm-nQeWSh2cu5ei66eYSeliAL_gtXJetvIEXGC6D30yXhfaX8FRn99Pl-Sl41Ksh2We35wJ8__hhvfxUnX9dfV6enleaEZorYpjRrFcMW91rSRjnnTaCc6JM09VGaW1lYwhFzHJKe2lqarTQGlnGtejoArze-W5j-DHZlNvRJW2HQXkbptQKSjnBshRkAV7tJWktheBE3gsSTHBT2lLAo70gFkJgShkmBX35H7oJU_SlMq3gSLIG0-sX4h2kY0gp2r7dRjeqOLcYtdcj0d4ZiaJ5cWs8daM1_xR_Z6AAJzvA-T7EUf0KcTBtVvMQYl86r135-j5_ca_8jqrNvzP9AyAA1RM</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Ginsberg, Gary</creator><creator>Smolenski, Susan</creator><creator>Hattis, Dale</creator><creator>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creator><creator>Johns, Douglas O.</creator><creator>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</title><author>Ginsberg, Gary ; Smolenski, Susan ; Hattis, Dale ; Guyton, Kathryn Z. ; Johns, Douglas O. ; Sonawane, Babasaheb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conjugation</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Glutathione</topic><topic>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics</topic><topic>Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism</topic><topic>Glutathione Transferase - genetics</topic><topic>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Xenobiotics - metabolism</topic><topic>Xenobiotics - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattis, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Babasaheb</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ginsberg, Gary</au><au>Smolenski, Susan</au><au>Hattis, Dale</au><au>Guyton, Kathryn Z.</au><au>Johns, Douglas O.</au><au>Sonawane, Babasaheb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews</jtitle><addtitle>J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev</addtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>389-439</pages><issn>1093-7404</issn><eissn>1521-6950</eissn><abstract>Glutathione transferases (GST) catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with electrophiles, many of which may otherwise interact with protein or DNA. In select cases such as halogenated solvents, GST-mediated conjugation may lead to a more toxic or mutagenic metabolite. Polymorphisms that exert substantial effects on GST function were noted in human populations for several isozymes. This analysis focuses on three well-characterized isozymes, GSTM1, T1, and P1, in which polymorphisms were extensively studied with respect to DNA adducts and cancer in molecular epidemiologic studies. The current review and analysis focused upon how polymorphisms in these GST contributed to population variability in GST function. The first step in developing this review was to characterize the influence of genotype on phenotype (enzyme function) and the frequency of the polymorphisms across major population groups for all three GST. This information was then incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations to develop population distributions of enzyme function. These simulations were run separately for GSTM1, T1, and P1, and also for the combination of these isozymes, to assess the possibility of overlapping substrate specificity. Monte Carlo simulations indicated large interindividual variability for GSTM1 and T1 due to the presence of the null (zero activity) genotype, which is common in all populations studied. Even for GSTM1 or T1 non-null individuals, there was considerable interindividual variability with a bimodal distribution of enzyme activity evident. GSTP1 polymorphisms are associated with somewhat less variability due to the absence of null genotypes. However, in all cases simulated, the estimated variability is sufficiently large to warrant consideration of GST function distributions in assessments involving GST-mediated activation or detoxification of xenobiotics. Ideally, such assessments would involve physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) modeling to assess population variability in internal dose.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>20183528</pmid><doi>10.1080/10937400903158375</doi><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-7404 |
ispartof | Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2009-05, Vol.12 (5-6), p.389-439 |
issn | 1093-7404 1521-6950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777133512 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Animals Assessments Computer simulation Conjugation Enzymes Genetics, Population Genotype Genotype & phenotype Glutathione Glutathione S-Transferase pi - genetics Glutathione S-Transferase pi - metabolism Glutathione Transferase - genetics Glutathione Transferase - metabolism Humans Mathematical models Monte Carlo Method Monte Carlo methods Phenotype Polymorphism Polymorphism, Genetic Population genetics Solvents Xenobiotics - metabolism Xenobiotics - toxicity |
title | Genetic Polymorphism in Glutathione Transferases (GST): Population Distribution of GSTM1, T1, and P1 Conjugating Activity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A30%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20Polymorphism%20in%20Glutathione%20Transferases%20(GST):%20Population%20Distribution%20of%20GSTM1,%20T1,%20and%20P1%20Conjugating%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20toxicology%20and%20environmental%20health.%20Part%20B,%20Critical%20reviews&rft.au=Ginsberg,%20Gary&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=389-439&rft.issn=1093-7404&rft.eissn=1521-6950&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10937400903158375&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E34977629%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-2d5dc5fa51ecfc92566bcd7662ad8b4dacce98d2305e633f9d43dc7cc0e56c7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760958138&rft_id=info:pmid/20183528&rfr_iscdi=true |