Loading…

N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios

Testing of existing agronomic models is needed to ensure their validity and applicability to different soils, cropping systems and environments. Data collected from a 3-year field experiment of maize (zea mays L.) on a loamy sand and a clay loam soil were used to validate the research version of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant and soil 2001-02, Vol.229 (1), p.71-82
Main Authors: Sogbedji, J.M., van Es, H.M., Hutson, J.L., Geohring, L.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 229
creator Sogbedji, J.M.
van Es, H.M.
Hutson, J.L.
Geohring, L.D.
description Testing of existing agronomic models is needed to ensure their validity and applicability to different soils, cropping systems and environments. Data collected from a 3-year field experiment of maize (zea mays L.) on a loamy sand and a clay loam soil were used to validate the research version of the LEACHMN model for water flow and N fate and transport. Three calibration scenarios with increasing levels of generalization for transformation rate coefficients were used based on: (i) each year, treatment and soil type (ii) 3-year average values for each treatment and soil type, and (iii) average over years and soil types. Model accuracy was tested using both graphical and statistical methods including 1:1 scale plot, root mean square error and normalized root mean square error, and correlation coefficient values. The model accurately predicted drainage water flow rate and volume under both sites. Calibrated N transformation rate constants for each treatment, year and soil type provided satisfactory predictions of growing season cumulative NO₃-N leaching losses, and accurate predictions of growing season cumulative maize N uptake at both sites. The use of 3-year average rate constant values for each site resulted in fairly satisfactory predictions of NO₃-N leaching losses on the clay loam site, but inaccurate predictions on the loamy sand site. The model provided accurate predictions of cumulative maize N uptake for both sites. Using the rate constant values averaged over years and soil types resulted mostly in inaccurate predictions. Use of year and soil type-specific N rate coefficients results in accurate LEACHMN predictions of N leaching and maize N uptake. When rate coefficients are generalized over years for each soil type, satisfactory model predictions may be expected when N dynamics are not strongly affected by yearly variations in organic N inputs.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1004827200714
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17774241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42951089</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42951089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j292t-d74872742b2d71fd78b0169b2ce40f1f62a39d116f52a2a6f2705e1e9da57b9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUx0Op0LV69lQICt6mJm_yY9Pbsqx2Ya0eFLwNmZmkZskmYzJTWP8m_0gz2-LBSw8h5L1PPrzHF6E3lFxTAvWH1Q0lhC1BAiGSsjO0oFzWFSe1OEcLQmqoiFQ_LtDLnPdkflOxQH_ucNKjwTr0eEw65CGmEU-hNwk_6OR06w3uUhwGF-7xT5fHmI4n2po0Ou9-F_BkiAH7qA9HnOfufDqvj6caztH5fIO322v81SQb00GHrnyxeLdZrW8_3-Epz_7e2aI1YcSd9q4tXle0uTOhjBLzK_TCap_N66f7En3_uPm2vq12Xz5t16tdtQcFY9VLtpQgGbTQS2p7uWwJFaqFzjBiqRWga9VTKiwHDVpYkIQbalSvuWxVW1-i94_eIcVfk8ljc3BlCO91MHHKDZWy2Bl9HmRcciZ4Ad_-B-7jlEJZopGcAvASWYHePUE6l_1tiaNzuRmSO-h0bJQQkrBCXT1S-zmLf10GilOyVPVfyUmiVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751225071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Sogbedji, J.M. ; van Es, H.M. ; Hutson, J.L. ; Geohring, L.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sogbedji, J.M. ; van Es, H.M. ; Hutson, J.L. ; Geohring, L.D.</creatorcontrib><description>Testing of existing agronomic models is needed to ensure their validity and applicability to different soils, cropping systems and environments. Data collected from a 3-year field experiment of maize (zea mays L.) on a loamy sand and a clay loam soil were used to validate the research version of the LEACHMN model for water flow and N fate and transport. Three calibration scenarios with increasing levels of generalization for transformation rate coefficients were used based on: (i) each year, treatment and soil type (ii) 3-year average values for each treatment and soil type, and (iii) average over years and soil types. Model accuracy was tested using both graphical and statistical methods including 1:1 scale plot, root mean square error and normalized root mean square error, and correlation coefficient values. The model accurately predicted drainage water flow rate and volume under both sites. Calibrated N transformation rate constants for each treatment, year and soil type provided satisfactory predictions of growing season cumulative NO₃-N leaching losses, and accurate predictions of growing season cumulative maize N uptake at both sites. The use of 3-year average rate constant values for each site resulted in fairly satisfactory predictions of NO₃-N leaching losses on the clay loam site, but inaccurate predictions on the loamy sand site. The model provided accurate predictions of cumulative maize N uptake for both sites. Using the rate constant values averaged over years and soil types resulted mostly in inaccurate predictions. Use of year and soil type-specific N rate coefficients results in accurate LEACHMN predictions of N leaching and maize N uptake. When rate coefficients are generalized over years for each soil type, satisfactory model predictions may be expected when N dynamics are not strongly affected by yearly variations in organic N inputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1004827200714</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Agrology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological and physicochemical properties of pollutants. Interaction in the soil ; Calibration ; Clay loam ; Clay loam soils ; Corn ; Correlation coefficient ; Cropping sequence ; Cropping systems ; Drainage water ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow rates ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growing season ; Growing seasons ; Leaching ; Mathematical constants ; Mean square errors ; Modeling ; Nitrogen ; Pollution ; Sand ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil science ; Soil types ; Statistical methods ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2001-02, Vol.229 (1), p.71-82</ispartof><rights>2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42951089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42951089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=966704$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sogbedji, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Es, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geohring, L.D.</creatorcontrib><title>N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>Testing of existing agronomic models is needed to ensure their validity and applicability to different soils, cropping systems and environments. Data collected from a 3-year field experiment of maize (zea mays L.) on a loamy sand and a clay loam soil were used to validate the research version of the LEACHMN model for water flow and N fate and transport. Three calibration scenarios with increasing levels of generalization for transformation rate coefficients were used based on: (i) each year, treatment and soil type (ii) 3-year average values for each treatment and soil type, and (iii) average over years and soil types. Model accuracy was tested using both graphical and statistical methods including 1:1 scale plot, root mean square error and normalized root mean square error, and correlation coefficient values. The model accurately predicted drainage water flow rate and volume under both sites. Calibrated N transformation rate constants for each treatment, year and soil type provided satisfactory predictions of growing season cumulative NO₃-N leaching losses, and accurate predictions of growing season cumulative maize N uptake at both sites. The use of 3-year average rate constant values for each site resulted in fairly satisfactory predictions of NO₃-N leaching losses on the clay loam site, but inaccurate predictions on the loamy sand site. The model provided accurate predictions of cumulative maize N uptake for both sites. Using the rate constant values averaged over years and soil types resulted mostly in inaccurate predictions. Use of year and soil type-specific N rate coefficients results in accurate LEACHMN predictions of N leaching and maize N uptake. When rate coefficients are generalized over years for each soil type, satisfactory model predictions may be expected when N dynamics are not strongly affected by yearly variations in organic N inputs.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological and physicochemical properties of pollutants. Interaction in the soil</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>Clay loam soils</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Cropping sequence</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Drainage water</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Growing seasons</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Mathematical constants</subject><subject>Mean square errors</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUx0Op0LV69lQICt6mJm_yY9Pbsqx2Ya0eFLwNmZmkZskmYzJTWP8m_0gz2-LBSw8h5L1PPrzHF6E3lFxTAvWH1Q0lhC1BAiGSsjO0oFzWFSe1OEcLQmqoiFQ_LtDLnPdkflOxQH_ucNKjwTr0eEw65CGmEU-hNwk_6OR06w3uUhwGF-7xT5fHmI4n2po0Ou9-F_BkiAH7qA9HnOfufDqvj6caztH5fIO322v81SQb00GHrnyxeLdZrW8_3-Epz_7e2aI1YcSd9q4tXle0uTOhjBLzK_TCap_N66f7En3_uPm2vq12Xz5t16tdtQcFY9VLtpQgGbTQS2p7uWwJFaqFzjBiqRWga9VTKiwHDVpYkIQbalSvuWxVW1-i94_eIcVfk8ljc3BlCO91MHHKDZWy2Bl9HmRcciZ4Ad_-B-7jlEJZopGcAvASWYHePUE6l_1tiaNzuRmSO-h0bJQQkrBCXT1S-zmLf10GilOyVPVfyUmiVQ</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>Sogbedji, J.M.</creator><creator>van Es, H.M.</creator><creator>Hutson, J.L.</creator><creator>Geohring, L.D.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios</title><author>Sogbedji, J.M. ; van Es, H.M. ; Hutson, J.L. ; Geohring, L.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j292t-d74872742b2d71fd78b0169b2ce40f1f62a39d116f52a2a6f2705e1e9da57b9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological and physicochemical properties of pollutants. Interaction in the soil</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>Clay loam soils</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Cropping sequence</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Drainage water</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Growing seasons</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Mathematical constants</topic><topic>Mean square errors</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sogbedji, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Es, H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geohring, L.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sogbedji, J.M.</au><au>van Es, H.M.</au><au>Hutson, J.L.</au><au>Geohring, L.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>229</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>71-82</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Testing of existing agronomic models is needed to ensure their validity and applicability to different soils, cropping systems and environments. Data collected from a 3-year field experiment of maize (zea mays L.) on a loamy sand and a clay loam soil were used to validate the research version of the LEACHMN model for water flow and N fate and transport. Three calibration scenarios with increasing levels of generalization for transformation rate coefficients were used based on: (i) each year, treatment and soil type (ii) 3-year average values for each treatment and soil type, and (iii) average over years and soil types. Model accuracy was tested using both graphical and statistical methods including 1:1 scale plot, root mean square error and normalized root mean square error, and correlation coefficient values. The model accurately predicted drainage water flow rate and volume under both sites. Calibrated N transformation rate constants for each treatment, year and soil type provided satisfactory predictions of growing season cumulative NO₃-N leaching losses, and accurate predictions of growing season cumulative maize N uptake at both sites. The use of 3-year average rate constant values for each site resulted in fairly satisfactory predictions of NO₃-N leaching losses on the clay loam site, but inaccurate predictions on the loamy sand site. The model provided accurate predictions of cumulative maize N uptake for both sites. Using the rate constant values averaged over years and soil types resulted mostly in inaccurate predictions. Use of year and soil type-specific N rate coefficients results in accurate LEACHMN predictions of N leaching and maize N uptake. When rate coefficients are generalized over years for each soil type, satisfactory model predictions may be expected when N dynamics are not strongly affected by yearly variations in organic N inputs.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1004827200714</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2001-02, Vol.229 (1), p.71-82
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17774241
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link
subjects Agricultural soils
Agrology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Biological and physicochemical properties of pollutants. Interaction in the soil
Calibration
Clay loam
Clay loam soils
Corn
Correlation coefficient
Cropping sequence
Cropping systems
Drainage water
Exact sciences and technology
Flow rates
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Growing season
Growing seasons
Leaching
Mathematical constants
Mean square errors
Modeling
Nitrogen
Pollution
Sand
Soil and sediments pollution
Soil and water pollution
Soil science
Soil types
Statistical methods
Water flow
title N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A55%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=N%20rate%20and%20transport%20under%20variable%20cropping%20history%20and%20fertilizer%20rate%20on%20loamy%20sand%20and%20clay%20loam%20soils:%20II.%20Performance%20of%20LEACHMN%20using%20different%20calibration%20scenarios&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Sogbedji,%20J.M.&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=229&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=71-82&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1004827200714&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42951089%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j292t-d74872742b2d71fd78b0169b2ce40f1f62a39d116f52a2a6f2705e1e9da57b9b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751225071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42951089&rfr_iscdi=true