Loading…

Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes

Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and mai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information systems (Oxford) 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346
Main Authors: Mrasek, Richard, Mülle, Jutta, Böhm, Klemens, Becker, Michael, Allmann, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183
container_end_page 346
container_issue
container_start_page 326
container_title Information systems (Oxford)
container_volume 56
creator Mrasek, Richard
Mülle, Jutta
Böhm, Klemens
Becker, Michael
Allmann, Christian
description Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment. •Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778015365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306437915001702</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778015365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiAeom2TNy7FApR31QZDcjaNICAZohmQnpeK5p2JLMk1N4y3_IP8wvCQ17yNLpgMP73McjxJWCXIHS16s8cF6AqnOwOUD9ScyUacpMQ6M_ixmUoLOqbOwX8ZV5BQBFbe1MbB_iMFKc9pJHwrAI2E5h6L_LMQ5IzPKZ4odu23sZaRziFPq_8u3lVc4ltkySp53fy39hWiZiGXBNGQ6bTWBO3CF7mkd8Ic4W7Zrp8lTPxdPtz8ebX9n9n7vfN_P7DAsDU6YL642vUXeFV7rBylTQLRBrBdg0racSKtvZzqO3LRpPVdVVhErXXWeMMuW5-HacmzZvd8STS9cgrddtT8OOnWoak3SVuk5ROEYxDsyRFm6MYdPGvVPgDnbdygV2B7sOrEt2E_LjiFB64TlQdIyBeiQfIuHk_BD-D78DkLeFkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778015365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment. •Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Business process management ; Commissioning ; Industrial processes ; Information systems ; Model checking ; Petri net ; Property specification ; Specifications ; Stations ; Transformations ; Vehicle commissioning processes ; Verification ; Workflow management</subject><ispartof>Information systems (Oxford), 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2043-9323 ; 0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mülle, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><title>Information systems (Oxford)</title><description>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment. •Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Business process management</subject><subject>Commissioning</subject><subject>Industrial processes</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Model checking</subject><subject>Petri net</subject><subject>Property specification</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><subject>Vehicle commissioning processes</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>Workflow management</subject><issn>0306-4379</issn><issn>1873-6076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiAeom2TNy7FApR31QZDcjaNICAZohmQnpeK5p2JLMk1N4y3_IP8wvCQ17yNLpgMP73McjxJWCXIHS16s8cF6AqnOwOUD9ScyUacpMQ6M_ixmUoLOqbOwX8ZV5BQBFbe1MbB_iMFKc9pJHwrAI2E5h6L_LMQ5IzPKZ4odu23sZaRziFPq_8u3lVc4ltkySp53fy39hWiZiGXBNGQ6bTWBO3CF7mkd8Ic4W7Zrp8lTPxdPtz8ebX9n9n7vfN_P7DAsDU6YL642vUXeFV7rBylTQLRBrBdg0racSKtvZzqO3LRpPVdVVhErXXWeMMuW5-HacmzZvd8STS9cgrddtT8OOnWoak3SVuk5ROEYxDsyRFm6MYdPGvVPgDnbdygV2B7sOrEt2E_LjiFB64TlQdIyBeiQfIuHk_BD-D78DkLeFkQ</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Mrasek, Richard</creator><creator>Mülle, Jutta</creator><creator>Böhm, Klemens</creator><creator>Becker, Michael</creator><creator>Allmann, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-9323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><author>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Business process management</topic><topic>Commissioning</topic><topic>Industrial processes</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Model checking</topic><topic>Petri net</topic><topic>Property specification</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><topic>Vehicle commissioning processes</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>Workflow management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mülle, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Information systems (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mrasek, Richard</au><au>Mülle, Jutta</au><au>Böhm, Klemens</au><au>Becker, Michael</au><au>Allmann, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</atitle><jtitle>Information systems (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>326</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>326-346</pages><issn>0306-4379</issn><eissn>1873-6076</eissn><abstract>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment. •Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-9323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-4379
ispartof Information systems (Oxford), 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346
issn 0306-4379
1873-6076
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778015365
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Automobiles
Automotive components
Automotive engineering
Business process management
Commissioning
Industrial processes
Information systems
Model checking
Petri net
Property specification
Specifications
Stations
Transformations
Vehicle commissioning processes
Verification
Workflow management
title Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20specification,%20process%20verification,%20and%20reporting%20%E2%80%93%20A%20case%20study%20with%20vehicle-commissioning%20processes&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mrasek,%20Richard&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=326-346&rft.issn=0306-4379&rft.eissn=1873-6076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1778015365%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778015365&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true