Loading…
Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes
Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and mai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Information systems (Oxford) 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183 |
container_end_page | 346 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Information systems (Oxford) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Mrasek, Richard Mülle, Jutta Böhm, Klemens Becker, Michael Allmann, Christian |
description | Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment.
•Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778015365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306437915001702</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778015365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiAeom2TNy7FApR31QZDcjaNICAZohmQnpeK5p2JLMk1N4y3_IP8wvCQ17yNLpgMP73McjxJWCXIHS16s8cF6AqnOwOUD9ScyUacpMQ6M_ixmUoLOqbOwX8ZV5BQBFbe1MbB_iMFKc9pJHwrAI2E5h6L_LMQ5IzPKZ4odu23sZaRziFPq_8u3lVc4ltkySp53fy39hWiZiGXBNGQ6bTWBO3CF7mkd8Ic4W7Zrp8lTPxdPtz8ebX9n9n7vfN_P7DAsDU6YL642vUXeFV7rBylTQLRBrBdg0racSKtvZzqO3LRpPVdVVhErXXWeMMuW5-HacmzZvd8STS9cgrddtT8OOnWoak3SVuk5ROEYxDsyRFm6MYdPGvVPgDnbdygV2B7sOrEt2E_LjiFB64TlQdIyBeiQfIuHk_BD-D78DkLeFkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778015365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment.
•Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Business process management ; Commissioning ; Industrial processes ; Information systems ; Model checking ; Petri net ; Property specification ; Specifications ; Stations ; Transformations ; Vehicle commissioning processes ; Verification ; Workflow management</subject><ispartof>Information systems (Oxford), 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2043-9323 ; 0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mülle, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><title>Information systems (Oxford)</title><description>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment.
•Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Business process management</subject><subject>Commissioning</subject><subject>Industrial processes</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Model checking</subject><subject>Petri net</subject><subject>Property specification</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><subject>Vehicle commissioning processes</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>Workflow management</subject><issn>0306-4379</issn><issn>1873-6076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiAeom2TNy7FApR31QZDcjaNICAZohmQnpeK5p2JLMk1N4y3_IP8wvCQ17yNLpgMP73McjxJWCXIHS16s8cF6AqnOwOUD9ScyUacpMQ6M_ixmUoLOqbOwX8ZV5BQBFbe1MbB_iMFKc9pJHwrAI2E5h6L_LMQ5IzPKZ4odu23sZaRziFPq_8u3lVc4ltkySp53fy39hWiZiGXBNGQ6bTWBO3CF7mkd8Ic4W7Zrp8lTPxdPtz8ebX9n9n7vfN_P7DAsDU6YL642vUXeFV7rBylTQLRBrBdg0racSKtvZzqO3LRpPVdVVhErXXWeMMuW5-HacmzZvd8STS9cgrddtT8OOnWoak3SVuk5ROEYxDsyRFm6MYdPGvVPgDnbdygV2B7sOrEt2E_LjiFB64TlQdIyBeiQfIuHk_BD-D78DkLeFkQ</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Mrasek, Richard</creator><creator>Mülle, Jutta</creator><creator>Böhm, Klemens</creator><creator>Becker, Michael</creator><creator>Allmann, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-9323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</title><author>Mrasek, Richard ; Mülle, Jutta ; Böhm, Klemens ; Becker, Michael ; Allmann, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Business process management</topic><topic>Commissioning</topic><topic>Industrial processes</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Model checking</topic><topic>Petri net</topic><topic>Property specification</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><topic>Vehicle commissioning processes</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>Workflow management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mrasek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mülle, Jutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allmann, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Information systems (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mrasek, Richard</au><au>Mülle, Jutta</au><au>Böhm, Klemens</au><au>Becker, Michael</au><au>Allmann, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes</atitle><jtitle>Information systems (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>326</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>326-346</pages><issn>0306-4379</issn><eissn>1873-6076</eissn><abstract>Testing in the automotive industry is supposed to guarantee that vehicles are shipped without any flaw. Respective processes are complex, due to the variety of components and electronic devices in modern vehicles. To achieve error-free processes, their formal analysis is required. Specifying and maintaining properties the processes must satisfy in a user-friendly way is a core requirement on any verification system. We have observed that there are few property templates that testing processes must adhere to, and we describe these templates. They depend on the context of the processes, e.g., the components of the vehicle or testing stations. We have developed a framework that instantiates the templates of properties at verification time and then verifies the process against these instances. To allow an automatic verification we develop a transformation of the commissioning process to a Petri net. Using a novel approach, we are able to report the found violations to the user in a user-friendly way. Our empirical evaluation with the industrial partner has shown that our framework does detect property violations in processes. From expert interviews we conclude that our framework is user-friendly and well suited to operate in a real production environment.
•Our tool verifies if a given process for the commissioning of vehicles complies.•Our approach supports the user-friendly specification and reporting of properties.•We automatically generate properties through the instantiation of property templates.•The developed transformation to Petri nets allows an automatic verification.•Our tool is able to detect violations in large processes of the Audi AG.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-9323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-7756</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-4379 |
ispartof | Information systems (Oxford), 2016-03, Vol.56, p.326-346 |
issn | 0306-4379 1873-6076 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778015365 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Automobiles Automotive components Automotive engineering Business process management Commissioning Industrial processes Information systems Model checking Petri net Property specification Specifications Stations Transformations Vehicle commissioning processes Verification Workflow management |
title | Property specification, process verification, and reporting – A case study with vehicle-commissioning processes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20specification,%20process%20verification,%20and%20reporting%20%E2%80%93%20A%20case%20study%20with%20vehicle-commissioning%20processes&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mrasek,%20Richard&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=326-346&rft.issn=0306-4379&rft.eissn=1873-6076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.is.2015.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1778015365%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-629d8d5c6b2d167c4840bfcc510c77ade3049b9bdcd9ac8de44b4ec165bb88183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778015365&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |