Loading…
Constraining the age of Liuqu Conglomerate, southern Tibet: Implications for evolution of the India–Asia collision zone
Controversy over the depositional age and provenance of the Liuqu Conglomerate along the major structural Indus–Yarlung suture zone in South Tibet clouds our understanding of the process of the India/Asia collision. Here, we report low-temperature thermochronometric data (apatite fission track, apat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Earth and planetary science letters 2015-09, Vol.426, p.259-266 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Controversy over the depositional age and provenance of the Liuqu Conglomerate along the major structural Indus–Yarlung suture zone in South Tibet clouds our understanding of the process of the India/Asia collision. Here, we report low-temperature thermochronometric data (apatite fission track, apatite and zircon (U–Th)/He for the Liuqu Conglomerate in the Xigaze area). Our new data constrain its depositional age to latest Oligocene–Early Miocene time, indicating that rather than having formed immediately following Paleogene India–Asia collision or collision between India and an intra-oceanic arc as previously proposed, the Conglomerate was probably deposited in an intermontane basin, at a slightly later time than the Gangrinboche Group to the north. The Liuqu Conglomerate should therefore not be used as a key horizon in models constraining the early stages of India/Asia collision. Our data together with previous studies suggest that the Liuqu Conglomerate was sourced from the Xigaze forearc basin, Indus–Yarlung suture zone, as well as the Tethyan Himalaya. Furthermore, our data indicate that exhumation of the Liuqu Conglomerate commenced at ∼ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-821X 1385-013X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.010 |