Loading…
Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures
Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3 |
container_end_page | 100 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Gilbert, Eva M. Agrawal, Shelesh Schwartz, Thomas Horn, Harald Lackner, Susanne |
description | Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778059433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135415300051</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746893264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK0KVLYL_wChHLlk8St-XCqhFS2VEHCg11qOM0FeJfHWdtjy72tY2mOLNJKlmW9mbH8InRK8IpiIi81qZ3OEtKKYNCtcgtIPaEGU1DXlXB2gBcac1YQ1_Ah9SmmDcUGY_oiOqCgVJpsF-rEO49ZGPz1Wne97iDDlKoJ1OcTKhan3j3O02YcpVX1J3duYvR2qW5-jz6-Fi8vJjmP4VdlcDWFXZRi3UHrmcrljdNjbIcHJ27lE379cPayv65u7r9_Wlze145rnmklKOsqAEcsZIa3gDeFactW7RjnVUo5VoxqQpGWaWKW1060TlAohSEstW6Lz_dxtDD9nSNmMPjkYBjtBmJMhUirc6PLod6BcKM2o4P9HhZaSay1FQfkedTGkFKE32-hHG58NwebFl9mYvS_z4svgEkXGEp29bZjbEbq_TX8EFeDzHoDye08eoknOw-Sg8xFcNl3w_97wG11Xp-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697749976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><description>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to <13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed.
[Display omitted]
•Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26043375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Biofilm ; Biofilms ; Biomass ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Cold ; Deammonification ; Denitrification ; Geometry ; Mainstream ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nitrogen removal ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Reactor systems ; Reactors ; Side effects ; Summer ; Temperature ; Temperature gradient ; Waste Water ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26043375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Shelesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to <13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed.
[Display omitted]
•Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Deammonification</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Mainstream</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Reactor systems</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature gradient</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK0KVLYL_wChHLlk8St-XCqhFS2VEHCg11qOM0FeJfHWdtjy72tY2mOLNJKlmW9mbH8InRK8IpiIi81qZ3OEtKKYNCtcgtIPaEGU1DXlXB2gBcac1YQ1_Ah9SmmDcUGY_oiOqCgVJpsF-rEO49ZGPz1Wne97iDDlKoJ1OcTKhan3j3O02YcpVX1J3duYvR2qW5-jz6-Fi8vJjmP4VdlcDWFXZRi3UHrmcrljdNjbIcHJ27lE379cPayv65u7r9_Wlze145rnmklKOsqAEcsZIa3gDeFactW7RjnVUo5VoxqQpGWaWKW1060TlAohSEstW6Lz_dxtDD9nSNmMPjkYBjtBmJMhUirc6PLod6BcKM2o4P9HhZaSay1FQfkedTGkFKE32-hHG58NwebFl9mYvS_z4svgEkXGEp29bZjbEbq_TX8EFeDzHoDye08eoknOw-Sg8xFcNl3w_97wG11Xp-A</recordid><startdate>20150915</startdate><enddate>20150915</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Eva M.</creator><creator>Agrawal, Shelesh</creator><creator>Schwartz, Thomas</creator><creator>Horn, Harald</creator><creator>Lackner, Susanne</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150915</creationdate><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><author>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Deammonification</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Mainstream</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Reactor systems</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature gradient</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Shelesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Eva M.</au><au>Agrawal, Shelesh</au><au>Schwartz, Thomas</au><au>Horn, Harald</au><au>Lackner, Susanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2015-09-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>92-100</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to <13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed.
[Display omitted]
•Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26043375</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778059433 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Anaerobiosis Biofilm Biofilms Biomass Bioreactors - microbiology Cold Deammonification Denitrification Geometry Mainstream Nitrogen - metabolism Nitrogen removal Oxidation-Reduction Reactor systems Reactors Side effects Summer Temperature Temperature gradient Waste Water Water Purification - methods |
title | Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20different%20reactor%20configurations%20for%20Partial%20Nitritation/Anammox%20at%20low%20temperatures&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Eva%20M.&rft.date=2015-09-15&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=92-100&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746893264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697749976&rft_id=info:pmid/26043375&rfr_iscdi=true |