Loading…

Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures

Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100
Main Authors: Gilbert, Eva M., Agrawal, Shelesh, Schwartz, Thomas, Horn, Harald, Lackner, Susanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3
container_end_page 100
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 81
creator Gilbert, Eva M.
Agrawal, Shelesh
Schwartz, Thomas
Horn, Harald
Lackner, Susanne
description Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778059433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135415300051</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746893264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK0KVLYL_wChHLlk8St-XCqhFS2VEHCg11qOM0FeJfHWdtjy72tY2mOLNJKlmW9mbH8InRK8IpiIi81qZ3OEtKKYNCtcgtIPaEGU1DXlXB2gBcac1YQ1_Ah9SmmDcUGY_oiOqCgVJpsF-rEO49ZGPz1Wne97iDDlKoJ1OcTKhan3j3O02YcpVX1J3duYvR2qW5-jz6-Fi8vJjmP4VdlcDWFXZRi3UHrmcrljdNjbIcHJ27lE379cPayv65u7r9_Wlze145rnmklKOsqAEcsZIa3gDeFactW7RjnVUo5VoxqQpGWaWKW1060TlAohSEstW6Lz_dxtDD9nSNmMPjkYBjtBmJMhUirc6PLod6BcKM2o4P9HhZaSay1FQfkedTGkFKE32-hHG58NwebFl9mYvS_z4svgEkXGEp29bZjbEbq_TX8EFeDzHoDye08eoknOw-Sg8xFcNl3w_97wG11Xp-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697749976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><description>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to &lt;13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed. [Display omitted] •Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26043375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Biofilm ; Biofilms ; Biomass ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Cold ; Deammonification ; Denitrification ; Geometry ; Mainstream ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nitrogen removal ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Reactor systems ; Reactors ; Side effects ; Summer ; Temperature ; Temperature gradient ; Waste Water ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26043375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Shelesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to &lt;13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed. [Display omitted] •Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Deammonification</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Mainstream</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Reactor systems</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature gradient</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK0KVLYL_wChHLlk8St-XCqhFS2VEHCg11qOM0FeJfHWdtjy72tY2mOLNJKlmW9mbH8InRK8IpiIi81qZ3OEtKKYNCtcgtIPaEGU1DXlXB2gBcac1YQ1_Ah9SmmDcUGY_oiOqCgVJpsF-rEO49ZGPz1Wne97iDDlKoJ1OcTKhan3j3O02YcpVX1J3duYvR2qW5-jz6-Fi8vJjmP4VdlcDWFXZRi3UHrmcrljdNjbIcHJ27lE379cPayv65u7r9_Wlze145rnmklKOsqAEcsZIa3gDeFactW7RjnVUo5VoxqQpGWaWKW1060TlAohSEstW6Lz_dxtDD9nSNmMPjkYBjtBmJMhUirc6PLod6BcKM2o4P9HhZaSay1FQfkedTGkFKE32-hHG58NwebFl9mYvS_z4svgEkXGEp29bZjbEbq_TX8EFeDzHoDye08eoknOw-Sg8xFcNl3w_97wG11Xp-A</recordid><startdate>20150915</startdate><enddate>20150915</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Eva M.</creator><creator>Agrawal, Shelesh</creator><creator>Schwartz, Thomas</creator><creator>Horn, Harald</creator><creator>Lackner, Susanne</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150915</creationdate><title>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</title><author>Gilbert, Eva M. ; Agrawal, Shelesh ; Schwartz, Thomas ; Horn, Harald ; Lackner, Susanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Deammonification</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Mainstream</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Reactor systems</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature gradient</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Shelesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Eva M.</au><au>Agrawal, Shelesh</au><au>Schwartz, Thomas</au><au>Horn, Harald</au><au>Lackner, Susanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2015-09-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>92-100</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>Partial Nitritation/Anammox (PN/A) is a well-established technology for side-stream nitrogen removal from highly concentrated, warm wastewaters. The focus has now shifted to weakly concentrated municipal wastewaters with much lower concentrations and temperatures. The major challenge is the temperature, which ranges from moderate 20 °C in summer to cold 10 °C in winter. For this study, the most frequently used configurations for side-stream applications were exposed to a slow temperature reduction from 20 °C to 10 °C to simulate a realistic temperature gradient. To evaluate the behavior of the different biomasses based on their properties, four lab reactors were operated in two different configurations. Synthetic wastewater was used to avoid side effects of heterotrophic growth. Differences in the response of the different reactor systems to this temperature gradient clearly indicated, that the geometry of the biomass has a major impact on the overall PN/A performance at low temperatures: While anammox activity in suspended biomass suffered already at 15 °C, it persevered in granular biomass as well as in biofilms on carriers for temperatures down to &lt;13 °C. Further, anammox activity in thicker biofilms was less affected than in thinner biofilms and even adaption to low temperatures was observed. [Display omitted] •Operation of 4 different PN/A reactors over a temperature gradient of 20° to 10 °C.•Thicker biofilms show better performance and less nitrite accumulation.•Biofilms (MBBR) retain more anammox biomass.•Microbial community in MBBR more stable than in SBR.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26043375</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.81, p.92-100
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778059433
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Anaerobiosis
Biofilm
Biofilms
Biomass
Bioreactors - microbiology
Cold
Deammonification
Denitrification
Geometry
Mainstream
Nitrogen - metabolism
Nitrogen removal
Oxidation-Reduction
Reactor systems
Reactors
Side effects
Summer
Temperature
Temperature gradient
Waste Water
Water Purification - methods
title Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20different%20reactor%20configurations%20for%20Partial%20Nitritation/Anammox%20at%20low%20temperatures&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Eva%20M.&rft.date=2015-09-15&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=92-100&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746893264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-3721d23e31a4311b645149748fc58c8b2408585e71b391a899c9bc6226661b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697749976&rft_id=info:pmid/26043375&rfr_iscdi=true