Loading…

Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature

Background Chlorhexidine (CHL) has antiseptic and disinfectant properties used to prevent hospital‐acquired infections. CHL‐induced anaphylaxis is poorly reported in surgical literature despite government warnings and growing recognition. The aim of this review is to increase awareness of CHL‐induce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANZ journal of surgery 2016-04, Vol.86 (4), p.237-243
Main Authors: Sharp, Gary, Green, Sarah, Rose, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733
container_end_page 243
container_issue 4
container_start_page 237
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 86
creator Sharp, Gary
Green, Sarah
Rose, Michael
description Background Chlorhexidine (CHL) has antiseptic and disinfectant properties used to prevent hospital‐acquired infections. CHL‐induced anaphylaxis is poorly reported in surgical literature despite government warnings and growing recognition. The aim of this review is to increase awareness of CHL‐induced anaphylaxis in the surgical population. Methods Literature review of Embase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane library using ‘anaphylaxis (and) chlorhexidine’ search terms. Results Thirty‐six articles were published on surgical patients suffering anaphylaxis to CHL. Within these, seven patients had two proven separate anaphylactic reactions and one had three separate proven anaphylactic reactions. The most commonly affected speciality was urology. The majority occurred during elective procedures. A history of atopy was surprisingly uncommon as was bronchospasm. Six patients required active chest compressions and 39.71% of patients had their surgical procedure abandoned. Unplanned intensive care admissions occurred in 27.94%. Discussion In order to reduce abandoned procedures, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, morbidity and mortality associated with CHL‐induced anaphylaxis we recommend the following: rationalization of CHL‐containing products, greater vigilance regarding subtle symptoms of CHL allergy, appropriate investigation of these symptoms and a greater awareness of CHL‐containing products. Lastly, we outline the appropriate investigations and highlight the need for meticulous documentation in those who are CHL allergic.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.13269
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778705714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008530571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtO4zAUQC0E4lFYzA8gS2yYRSCOX_HsqorpIF4Sz9lZTnxDzaRJsRNo_34MLSyQ8OZ6ce7R1UHoB0mPSHzHpglHhGZCraFtwhhPMqLk-upPGKVbaCeEpzQlQii-ibYyQQXJVbqNrkeTuvUTmDvrGkhcY_sSLDaNmU0WtZm7gF2DQ-8fXWlqPDOdg6YLv7DBHl4cvOK2wt0EcO068KbrPeyijcrUAfZWc4Dufp_cjv4k51fj09HwPCkZlyrhpJSM20JVnBEmClJRm4KKpxMhrZSciZxnWUUKlrGsosrmqihKWVgDppCUDtDh0jvz7XMPodNTF0qoa9NA2wdNpMxlymUMMEAHX9CntvdNvO6NiljUkUj9XFKlb0PwUOmZd1PjF5qk-i20jqH1e-jI7q-MfTEF-0l-lI3A8RJ4dTUsvjfp4eXNhzJZbrjQwfxzw_h_WkgquX64HOv8Ir9XZ-O_ekT_A9h_lbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777877331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sharp, Gary ; Green, Sarah ; Rose, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Gary ; Green, Sarah ; Rose, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Background Chlorhexidine (CHL) has antiseptic and disinfectant properties used to prevent hospital‐acquired infections. CHL‐induced anaphylaxis is poorly reported in surgical literature despite government warnings and growing recognition. The aim of this review is to increase awareness of CHL‐induced anaphylaxis in the surgical population. Methods Literature review of Embase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane library using ‘anaphylaxis (and) chlorhexidine’ search terms. Results Thirty‐six articles were published on surgical patients suffering anaphylaxis to CHL. Within these, seven patients had two proven separate anaphylactic reactions and one had three separate proven anaphylactic reactions. The most commonly affected speciality was urology. The majority occurred during elective procedures. A history of atopy was surprisingly uncommon as was bronchospasm. Six patients required active chest compressions and 39.71% of patients had their surgical procedure abandoned. Unplanned intensive care admissions occurred in 27.94%. Discussion In order to reduce abandoned procedures, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, morbidity and mortality associated with CHL‐induced anaphylaxis we recommend the following: rationalization of CHL‐containing products, greater vigilance regarding subtle symptoms of CHL allergy, appropriate investigation of these symptoms and a greater awareness of CHL‐containing products. Lastly, we outline the appropriate investigations and highlight the need for meticulous documentation in those who are CHL allergic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.13269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26361890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Allergies ; anaphylaxis ; Anaphylaxis - chemically induced ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - adverse effects ; Child ; chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - adverse effects ; Critical Care - methods ; Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perioperative Period ; Prevalence ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2016-04, Vol.86 (4), p.237-243</ispartof><rights>2015 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Chlorhexidine (CHL) has antiseptic and disinfectant properties used to prevent hospital‐acquired infections. CHL‐induced anaphylaxis is poorly reported in surgical literature despite government warnings and growing recognition. The aim of this review is to increase awareness of CHL‐induced anaphylaxis in the surgical population. Methods Literature review of Embase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane library using ‘anaphylaxis (and) chlorhexidine’ search terms. Results Thirty‐six articles were published on surgical patients suffering anaphylaxis to CHL. Within these, seven patients had two proven separate anaphylactic reactions and one had three separate proven anaphylactic reactions. The most commonly affected speciality was urology. The majority occurred during elective procedures. A history of atopy was surprisingly uncommon as was bronchospasm. Six patients required active chest compressions and 39.71% of patients had their surgical procedure abandoned. Unplanned intensive care admissions occurred in 27.94%. Discussion In order to reduce abandoned procedures, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, morbidity and mortality associated with CHL‐induced anaphylaxis we recommend the following: rationalization of CHL‐containing products, greater vigilance regarding subtle symptoms of CHL allergy, appropriate investigation of these symptoms and a greater awareness of CHL‐containing products. Lastly, we outline the appropriate investigations and highlight the need for meticulous documentation in those who are CHL allergic.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>anaphylaxis</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - chemically induced</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Perioperative Period</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtO4zAUQC0E4lFYzA8gS2yYRSCOX_HsqorpIF4Sz9lZTnxDzaRJsRNo_34MLSyQ8OZ6ce7R1UHoB0mPSHzHpglHhGZCraFtwhhPMqLk-upPGKVbaCeEpzQlQii-ibYyQQXJVbqNrkeTuvUTmDvrGkhcY_sSLDaNmU0WtZm7gF2DQ-8fXWlqPDOdg6YLv7DBHl4cvOK2wt0EcO068KbrPeyijcrUAfZWc4Dufp_cjv4k51fj09HwPCkZlyrhpJSM20JVnBEmClJRm4KKpxMhrZSciZxnWUUKlrGsosrmqihKWVgDppCUDtDh0jvz7XMPodNTF0qoa9NA2wdNpMxlymUMMEAHX9CntvdNvO6NiljUkUj9XFKlb0PwUOmZd1PjF5qk-i20jqH1e-jI7q-MfTEF-0l-lI3A8RJ4dTUsvjfp4eXNhzJZbrjQwfxzw_h_WkgquX64HOv8Ir9XZ-O_ekT_A9h_lbs</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Sharp, Gary</creator><creator>Green, Sarah</creator><creator>Rose, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature</title><author>Sharp, Gary ; Green, Sarah ; Rose, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>anaphylaxis</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - chemically induced</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Perioperative Period</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharp, Gary</au><au>Green, Sarah</au><au>Rose, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>237-243</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background Chlorhexidine (CHL) has antiseptic and disinfectant properties used to prevent hospital‐acquired infections. CHL‐induced anaphylaxis is poorly reported in surgical literature despite government warnings and growing recognition. The aim of this review is to increase awareness of CHL‐induced anaphylaxis in the surgical population. Methods Literature review of Embase, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane library using ‘anaphylaxis (and) chlorhexidine’ search terms. Results Thirty‐six articles were published on surgical patients suffering anaphylaxis to CHL. Within these, seven patients had two proven separate anaphylactic reactions and one had three separate proven anaphylactic reactions. The most commonly affected speciality was urology. The majority occurred during elective procedures. A history of atopy was surprisingly uncommon as was bronchospasm. Six patients required active chest compressions and 39.71% of patients had their surgical procedure abandoned. Unplanned intensive care admissions occurred in 27.94%. Discussion In order to reduce abandoned procedures, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, morbidity and mortality associated with CHL‐induced anaphylaxis we recommend the following: rationalization of CHL‐containing products, greater vigilance regarding subtle symptoms of CHL allergy, appropriate investigation of these symptoms and a greater awareness of CHL‐containing products. Lastly, we outline the appropriate investigations and highlight the need for meticulous documentation in those who are CHL allergic.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26361890</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.13269</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2016-04, Vol.86 (4), p.237-243
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778705714
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Allergies
anaphylaxis
Anaphylaxis - chemically induced
Anti-Infective Agents, Local - adverse effects
Child
chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine - adverse effects
Critical Care - methods
Critical Care - statistics & numerical data
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Humans
Intensive care
Male
Middle Aged
Perioperative Period
Prevalence
Surgery
title Chlorhexidine-induced anaphylaxis in surgical patients: a review of the literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chlorhexidine-induced%20anaphylaxis%20in%20surgical%20patients:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Sharp,%20Gary&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=237-243&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.13269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008530571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-51c745db9f54146b1f3d0e9219167d775468522f1b4242f39d89bbc7bdaeab733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777877331&rft_id=info:pmid/26361890&rfr_iscdi=true