Density-dependent productivity in a colonial vulture at two spatial scales

• Published in: Ecology (Durham) 2016-02, Vol.97 (2), p.406-416
• Main Authors: Fernández-Bellon, Darío, Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara, Arenas, Rafael, Donázar, JoséAntonio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aegypius monachus; Animals; birds; breeding; breeding success; Cinereous Vulture; coloniality; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources; data collection; Demographics; density dependence; ecologists; Ecology; Ecosystem; Falconiformes - physiology; habitat heterogeneity; Habitats; humans; interference competition; nesting; Nesting Behavior; nesting sites; Population Density; population regulation; productivity; Reproduction - physiology; Spain; threatened species; Time Factors; Vertebrates
• ISSN: 0012-9658; 1939-9170
• DOI: 10.1890/15-0357.1

Understanding how density dependence modifies demographic parameters in long‐lived vertebrates is a challenge for ecologists. Two alternative hypotheses have been used to explain the mechanisms behind density‐dependent effects on breeding output: habitat heterogeneity and individual adjustment (also known as interference competition). A number of studies have highlighted the importance of habitat heterogeneity in density dependence in territorial species, but less information exists on demographic processes in colonial species. For these, we expect density‐dependent mechanisms to operate at two spatial scales: colony and breeding unit. In this study, we used long‐term data from a recovering population of Cinereous Vultures (Aegypius monachus) in southern Spain. We analyzed a long‐term data set with information on 2162 breeding attempts at four colonies over a nine‐year period (2002–2010) to evaluate environmental and population parameters influencing breeding output. Our results suggest that breeding productivity is subject to density‐dependent processes at the colony and the nest site scale and is best explained by interference competition. Factors intrinsic to each colony, as well as environmental constraints linked to physiography and human presence, also play a role in regulatory processes. We detected the existence of a trade‐off between the disadvantages of nesting too close to conspecifics and the benefits of coloniality. These could be mediated by the agonistic interactions between breeding pairs and the benefits derived from social sharing of information by breeding individuals. We propose that this trade‐off may play a role in defining colony structure and may hold true for other colonial breeding bird species. Our findings also have important management implications for the conservation of this threatened species.