Loading…
Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘L...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agricultural and forest entomology 2004-11, Vol.6 (4), p.279-284 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723 |
container_end_page | 284 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Agricultural and forest entomology |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Cowles, R.S |
description | 1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred.
2 Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation, because outliers exist for both preferred and nonpreferred cultivars.
3 Removal of leaf hairs with adhesive tape permits their role in deterrence to be evaluated. Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs. Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs, and four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs.
4 The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development.
5 Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass. The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance. Accordingly, further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1461-9555.2004.00233.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17832537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>820227161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEEqXlN2CxQLBI6kf8QmzaUaeAKoooFewsT-aG8TSNB9uZmfx7PKTqghXe-Ej-zpXvOUWBCK5IPqfritSClJpzXlGM6wpjyli1f1IcPTwI9vRRc_68eBHjGmNCpVRHxd3NEBvYJLdwnUsj8i2KKdjdAkIYUTN0yW1tiCh5lFaAtq4HtAPYug5dJ-fDauyb1RBRHLrGpizeznwHfpMg2PdoNoQ8wvneLS28OymetbaL8PLhPi5u5xffZx_Lq-vLT7Ozq7KpFWYlELBAKNOttA1IRbhsqLCkXgjLCEiumMBcKaXVUlAgesmgbVsp8vqNlpQdF2-muZvgfw8Qk7l3ecmusz34IRoiFaOcyQy-_gdc-yH0-W-GaCEUplRnSE1QE3yMAVqzCe7ehtEQbA4VmLU5pGsO6ZpDBeZvBWafrR8m6851MP63z5zNL7LI9nKyu5hg_2i34c4IySQ3P75cGv3tq_g5r8_N58y_mvjWemN_BRfN7Q3FhGGsc2IEsz_7tKWm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196680229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Cowles, R.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Cowles, R.S</creatorcontrib><description>1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred.
2 Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation, because outliers exist for both preferred and nonpreferred cultivars.
3 Removal of leaf hairs with adhesive tape permits their role in deterrence to be evaluated. Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs. Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs, and four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs.
4 The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development.
5 Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass. The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance. Accordingly, further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-9555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-9563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9555.2004.00233.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Berries ; cultivars ; Curculionidae ; Deterrent ; Entomology ; feeding preferences ; Fragaria ananassa ; Fragaria × ananassa ; Genetic diversity ; host resistance ; larval development ; leaves ; maturation feeding ; mortality ; nitrogen content ; nonpreference ; Otiorhynchus sulcatus ; pest resistance ; pest tolerance ; strawberries ; tolerance ; trichomes ; varietal resistance</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest entomology, 2004-11, Vol.6 (4), p.279-284</ispartof><rights>The Royal Entomological Society, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cowles, R.S</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)</title><title>Agricultural and forest entomology</title><description>1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred.
2 Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation, because outliers exist for both preferred and nonpreferred cultivars.
3 Removal of leaf hairs with adhesive tape permits their role in deterrence to be evaluated. Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs. Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs, and four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs.
4 The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development.
5 Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass. The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance. Accordingly, further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Berries</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>Curculionidae</subject><subject>Deterrent</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>feeding preferences</subject><subject>Fragaria ananassa</subject><subject>Fragaria × ananassa</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>host resistance</subject><subject>larval development</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>maturation feeding</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>nitrogen content</subject><subject>nonpreference</subject><subject>Otiorhynchus sulcatus</subject><subject>pest resistance</subject><subject>pest tolerance</subject><subject>strawberries</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><subject>trichomes</subject><subject>varietal resistance</subject><issn>1461-9555</issn><issn>1461-9563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEEqXlN2CxQLBI6kf8QmzaUaeAKoooFewsT-aG8TSNB9uZmfx7PKTqghXe-Ej-zpXvOUWBCK5IPqfritSClJpzXlGM6wpjyli1f1IcPTwI9vRRc_68eBHjGmNCpVRHxd3NEBvYJLdwnUsj8i2KKdjdAkIYUTN0yW1tiCh5lFaAtq4HtAPYug5dJ-fDauyb1RBRHLrGpizeznwHfpMg2PdoNoQ8wvneLS28OymetbaL8PLhPi5u5xffZx_Lq-vLT7Ozq7KpFWYlELBAKNOttA1IRbhsqLCkXgjLCEiumMBcKaXVUlAgesmgbVsp8vqNlpQdF2-muZvgfw8Qk7l3ecmusz34IRoiFaOcyQy-_gdc-yH0-W-GaCEUplRnSE1QE3yMAVqzCe7ehtEQbA4VmLU5pGsO6ZpDBeZvBWafrR8m6851MP63z5zNL7LI9nKyu5hg_2i34c4IySQ3P75cGv3tq_g5r8_N58y_mvjWemN_BRfN7Q3FhGGsc2IEsz_7tKWm</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>Cowles, R.S</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)</title><author>Cowles, R.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Berries</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>Curculionidae</topic><topic>Deterrent</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>feeding preferences</topic><topic>Fragaria ananassa</topic><topic>Fragaria × ananassa</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>host resistance</topic><topic>larval development</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>maturation feeding</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>nitrogen content</topic><topic>nonpreference</topic><topic>Otiorhynchus sulcatus</topic><topic>pest resistance</topic><topic>pest tolerance</topic><topic>strawberries</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>trichomes</topic><topic>varietal resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowles, R.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowles, R.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>279-284</pages><issn>1461-9555</issn><eissn>1461-9563</eissn><abstract>1 The feeding preference of vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Fabricius), adults for foliage from 21 commercial cultivars of strawberries is investigated using binary choice tests with leaf disks, using ‘Honeoye’ as a standard against which all other cultivars are compared. ‘Delmarvel’, ‘Idea’, ‘Lester’, ‘Primetime’ and ‘Seneca’ are not preferred.
2 Variation in leaf nitrogen content is correlated with feeding preference, but does not explain all the variation, because outliers exist for both preferred and nonpreferred cultivars.
3 Removal of leaf hairs with adhesive tape permits their role in deterrence to be evaluated. Eight of the 21 cultivars have deterrent leaf hairs. Paradoxically, some highly preferred cultivars (e.g. ‘Latestar’ and ‘Tristar’) have deterrent leaf hairs, and four of the five nonpreferred cultivars lack significantly deterrent leaf hairs.
4 The 21 tested cultivars do not differ in their suitability for vine weevil larval development.
5 Differences in cultivar susceptibility to vine weevil in the field may involve interactions between the palatability and nutritional value of foliage, which influence fecundity and egg placement, and the tolerance of strawberry plants to larval feeding, determined by root biomass. The nonpreference traits found in the foliage of commercial cultivars of strawberry are present by chance. Accordingly, further selective breeding to enhance strawberry varietal tolerance to vine weevils may be possible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1461-9555.2004.00233.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-9555 |
ispartof | Agricultural and forest entomology, 2004-11, Vol.6 (4), p.279-284 |
issn | 1461-9555 1461-9563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17832537 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal populations Berries cultivars Curculionidae Deterrent Entomology feeding preferences Fragaria ananassa Fragaria × ananassa Genetic diversity host resistance larval development leaves maturation feeding mortality nitrogen content nonpreference Otiorhynchus sulcatus pest resistance pest tolerance strawberries tolerance trichomes varietal resistance |
title | Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A10%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20of%20strawberry%20cultivars%20to%20the%20vine%20weevil%20Otiorhynchus%20sulcatus%20(Coleoptera:%20Curculionidae)&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20entomology&rft.au=Cowles,%20R.S&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=279-284&rft.issn=1461-9555&rft.eissn=1461-9563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1461-9555.2004.00233.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E820227161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4803-e1eae1239f7ace78157c26a14b6a31e758360588898d62e19d3efff76200c9723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196680229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |