Loading…
Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion
A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceedi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of health politics, policy and law policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183 |
container_end_page | 286 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Journal of health politics, policy and law |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander Skocpol, Theda Lynch, Daniel |
description | A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1215/03616878-3476141 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783341625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4052926601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0EglLYmZAlFgYCOTuJnRGq8iEBlRCIMXLsawm0TrCTAv8eV20RQsKDP-6ee23fS8gBxKfAID2LeQaZFDLiicgggQ3Sg5SJCHImNklvkY4W-R2y6_1rHAaHbJvssExwFrY9Yi46X1n0np57X-tKtVVt_QkdhBndPBznSO-x_ajdWwgra2j7gnRkJ3VlJ_QBm66cVlpZ-qwcHc3R0Ts0IVAZOvxslPVBb49sjdXU4_5q7ZOny-Hj4Dq6HV3dDM5vI53ESRsZyGWpSjB5oplkJpbjtFR5aRSWDA0TTJUs_AxinuS5Bs20HmshEpNyZCB5nxwvdRtXv3fo22JWeY3TqbJYd74AITlPIGNpQI_-oK9152x43YKSTEqeQqDiJaVd7b3DcdG4aqbcVwFxsXCgWDtQrBwIJYcr4a6cofkpWLc8AHwJmO4Nu8aF3v-6-z_ZbyxUkGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788288351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-6878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1927</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/03616878-3476141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26732316</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHPLDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Duke University Press</publisher><subject>Associations ; Business ; Case studies ; Choices ; Commerce ; Court decisions ; Decisions ; Economics ; Expansion ; Government programs ; Governors ; Health ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Intellectuals ; Legislation ; Mathematical models ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence ; Medicaid - organization & administration ; Medicine and Health ; Networks ; Participation ; Partisanship ; Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ; Political parties ; Politics ; Public Health and Health Policy ; Public Policy ; Reforms ; Social networks ; State Government ; State laws ; Statistical models ; Studies ; Supreme Court Decisions ; Trade associations ; Uninsured people ; United States ; War</subject><ispartof>Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by Duke University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Duke University Press Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906,33204,33755</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skocpol, Theda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><title>Journal of health politics, policy and law</title><addtitle>J Health Polit Policy Law</addtitle><description>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medicaid - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medicine and Health</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Health and Health Policy</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>Trade associations</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0361-6878</issn><issn>1527-1927</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0EglLYmZAlFgYCOTuJnRGq8iEBlRCIMXLsawm0TrCTAv8eV20RQsKDP-6ee23fS8gBxKfAID2LeQaZFDLiicgggQ3Sg5SJCHImNklvkY4W-R2y6_1rHAaHbJvssExwFrY9Yi46X1n0np57X-tKtVVt_QkdhBndPBznSO-x_ajdWwgra2j7gnRkJ3VlJ_QBm66cVlpZ-qwcHc3R0Ts0IVAZOvxslPVBb49sjdXU4_5q7ZOny-Hj4Dq6HV3dDM5vI53ESRsZyGWpSjB5oplkJpbjtFR5aRSWDA0TTJUs_AxinuS5Bs20HmshEpNyZCB5nxwvdRtXv3fo22JWeY3TqbJYd74AITlPIGNpQI_-oK9152x43YKSTEqeQqDiJaVd7b3DcdG4aqbcVwFxsXCgWDtQrBwIJYcr4a6cofkpWLc8AHwJmO4Nu8aF3v-6-z_ZbyxUkGA</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creator><creator>Skocpol, Theda</creator><creator>Lynch, Daniel</creator><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Duke University Press, NC & IL</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><author>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medicaid - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medicine and Health</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Health and Health Policy</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>Trade associations</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skocpol, Theda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of health politics, policy and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</au><au>Skocpol, Theda</au><au>Lynch, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health politics, policy and law</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Polit Policy Law</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>239-286</pages><issn>0361-6878</issn><eissn>1527-1927</eissn><coden>JHPLDN</coden><abstract>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Duke University Press</pub><pmid>26732316</pmid><doi>10.1215/03616878-3476141</doi><tpages>48</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-6878 |
ispartof | Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286 |
issn | 0361-6878 1527-1927 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783341625 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Associations Business Case studies Choices Commerce Court decisions Decisions Economics Expansion Government programs Governors Health Health care Health care policy Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Intellectuals Legislation Mathematical models Medicaid Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence Medicaid - organization & administration Medicine and Health Networks Participation Partisanship Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Political parties Politics Public Health and Health Policy Public Policy Reforms Social networks State Government State laws Statistical models Studies Supreme Court Decisions Trade associations Uninsured people United States War |
title | Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Business%20Associations,%20Conservative%20Networks,%20and%20the%20Ongoing%20Republican%20War%20Over%20Medicaid%20Expansion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20politics,%20policy%20and%20law&rft.au=Hertel-Fernandez,%20Alexander&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=239-286&rft.issn=0361-6878&rft.eissn=1527-1927&rft.coden=JHPLDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/03616878-3476141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4052926601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788288351&rft_id=info:pmid/26732316&rfr_iscdi=true |