Loading…

Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion

A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceedi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of health politics, policy and law policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286
Main Authors: Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Skocpol, Theda, Lynch, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183
container_end_page 286
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Journal of health politics, policy and law
container_volume 41
creator Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander
Skocpol, Theda
Lynch, Daniel
description A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.
doi_str_mv 10.1215/03616878-3476141
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783341625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4052926601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0EglLYmZAlFgYCOTuJnRGq8iEBlRCIMXLsawm0TrCTAv8eV20RQsKDP-6ee23fS8gBxKfAID2LeQaZFDLiicgggQ3Sg5SJCHImNklvkY4W-R2y6_1rHAaHbJvssExwFrY9Yi46X1n0np57X-tKtVVt_QkdhBndPBznSO-x_ajdWwgra2j7gnRkJ3VlJ_QBm66cVlpZ-qwcHc3R0Ts0IVAZOvxslPVBb49sjdXU4_5q7ZOny-Hj4Dq6HV3dDM5vI53ESRsZyGWpSjB5oplkJpbjtFR5aRSWDA0TTJUs_AxinuS5Bs20HmshEpNyZCB5nxwvdRtXv3fo22JWeY3TqbJYd74AITlPIGNpQI_-oK9152x43YKSTEqeQqDiJaVd7b3DcdG4aqbcVwFxsXCgWDtQrBwIJYcr4a6cofkpWLc8AHwJmO4Nu8aF3v-6-z_ZbyxUkGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788288351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-6878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1927</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/03616878-3476141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26732316</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHPLDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Duke University Press</publisher><subject>Associations ; Business ; Case studies ; Choices ; Commerce ; Court decisions ; Decisions ; Economics ; Expansion ; Government programs ; Governors ; Health ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Care Reform - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Humans ; Intellectuals ; Legislation ; Mathematical models ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medicaid - organization &amp; administration ; Medicine and Health ; Networks ; Participation ; Partisanship ; Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ; Political parties ; Politics ; Public Health and Health Policy ; Public Policy ; Reforms ; Social networks ; State Government ; State laws ; Statistical models ; Studies ; Supreme Court Decisions ; Trade associations ; Uninsured people ; United States ; War</subject><ispartof>Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by Duke University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Duke University Press Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906,33204,33755</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skocpol, Theda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><title>Journal of health politics, policy and law</title><addtitle>J Health Polit Policy Law</addtitle><description>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Reform - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medicaid - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Medicine and Health</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Health and Health Policy</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>Trade associations</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0361-6878</issn><issn>1527-1927</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT1PwzAQhi0EglLYmZAlFgYCOTuJnRGq8iEBlRCIMXLsawm0TrCTAv8eV20RQsKDP-6ee23fS8gBxKfAID2LeQaZFDLiicgggQ3Sg5SJCHImNklvkY4W-R2y6_1rHAaHbJvssExwFrY9Yi46X1n0np57X-tKtVVt_QkdhBndPBznSO-x_ajdWwgra2j7gnRkJ3VlJ_QBm66cVlpZ-qwcHc3R0Ts0IVAZOvxslPVBb49sjdXU4_5q7ZOny-Hj4Dq6HV3dDM5vI53ESRsZyGWpSjB5oplkJpbjtFR5aRSWDA0TTJUs_AxinuS5Bs20HmshEpNyZCB5nxwvdRtXv3fo22JWeY3TqbJYd74AITlPIGNpQI_-oK9152x43YKSTEqeQqDiJaVd7b3DcdG4aqbcVwFxsXCgWDtQrBwIJYcr4a6cofkpWLc8AHwJmO4Nu8aF3v-6-z_ZbyxUkGA</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creator><creator>Skocpol, Theda</creator><creator>Lynch, Daniel</creator><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</title><author>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander ; Skocpol, Theda ; Lynch, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Reform - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medicaid - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Medicine and Health</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Health and Health Policy</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>Trade associations</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skocpol, Theda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of health politics, policy and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander</au><au>Skocpol, Theda</au><au>Lynch, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health politics, policy and law</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Polit Policy Law</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>239-286</pages><issn>0361-6878</issn><eissn>1527-1927</eissn><coden>JHPLDN</coden><abstract>A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid—and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including governors' decisions to endorse expansion or not as well as final state decisions? We tackle this puzzle, focusing closely on outcomes and battles in predominantly Republican-led states. Like earlier scholars, we find that partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans are central, but we go beyond earlier analyses to measure added effects from two dueling factions within the Republican coalition: statewide business associations and cross-state networks of ideologically conservative organizations. Using both statistical modeling and case studies, we show that GOP-leaning or GOP-dominated states have been most likely to embrace the expansion when organized business support outweighs pressures from conservative networks. Our findings help make sense of ongoing state-level debates over a core part of health reform and shed new light on mounting policy tensions within the Republican Party.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Duke University Press</pub><pmid>26732316</pmid><doi>10.1215/03616878-3476141</doi><tpages>48</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-6878
ispartof Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2016-04, Vol.41 (2), p.239-286
issn 0361-6878
1527-1927
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783341625
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Associations
Business
Case studies
Choices
Commerce
Court decisions
Decisions
Economics
Expansion
Government programs
Governors
Health
Health care
Health care policy
Health Care Reform - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Intellectuals
Legislation
Mathematical models
Medicaid
Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence
Medicaid - organization & administration
Medicine and Health
Networks
Participation
Partisanship
Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Political parties
Politics
Public Health and Health Policy
Public Policy
Reforms
Social networks
State Government
State laws
Statistical models
Studies
Supreme Court Decisions
Trade associations
Uninsured people
United States
War
title Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War Over Medicaid Expansion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Business%20Associations,%20Conservative%20Networks,%20and%20the%20Ongoing%20Republican%20War%20Over%20Medicaid%20Expansion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20politics,%20policy%20and%20law&rft.au=Hertel-Fernandez,%20Alexander&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=239-286&rft.issn=0361-6878&rft.eissn=1527-1927&rft.coden=JHPLDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/03616878-3476141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4052926601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-d198bab1d94c282d08f5ba9bdaeb2ed272ab2927103499c1c2ccfc774d53e2183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788288351&rft_id=info:pmid/26732316&rfr_iscdi=true