Loading…

Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)

Using lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus) we examined the extent of error that is created when non-population-specific or non-sex-specific data are used to develop fishery sustainability models. To put biases in perspective we first compared relative differences in susta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries research 2005-05, Vol.72 (2), p.141-148
Main Authors: Purchase, C.F., Collins, N.C., Shuter, B.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183
container_end_page 148
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Fisheries research
container_volume 72
creator Purchase, C.F.
Collins, N.C.
Shuter, B.J.
description Using lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus) we examined the extent of error that is created when non-population-specific or non-sex-specific data are used to develop fishery sustainability models. To put biases in perspective we first compared relative differences in sustainable harvest rate estimates of fast and slow growing populations to the mean difference between species. Few estimates of early mortality exist for either species, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that sustainable harvest rate estimates varied by more than 90% with those available. To evaluate biases created by predicting life history traits we estimated maturation age from asymptotic length in populations whose life history parameters had been measured directly. Incorporating species-specific information produced maturation ages that were closer to those measured (mean difference 22%) than did the estimates from inter-specific relationships (mean difference 42%). This resulted in sustainability estimates from species-specific predictions being closer to those estimated using actual maturation data. In evaluating problems associated with using non-sex-specific data we found that estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates increased when female-specific life history data were used (could only be done for walleye) instead of combined-sex data (mean change in the two populations was 7%). Analyses indicate that it is desirable to collect life history data on specific populations of lake trout and walleye. If this is not possible, estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates are most influenced by variation in estimates of early mortality, followed by the taxonomic resolution used to estimate co-variation among life history traits, and finally the use of combined-sex versus female-specific data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.11.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17839108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783604003042</els_id><sourcerecordid>17839108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCIyD5hNhDgh3n94TQavmRVuKwcLZsT1vTg5MMbieQp-FV8TBz59R9-KrU1cXYaylKKWT77lh6pEMEKish6lLKUoj2CdvJvquKtmvVU7bLXFN0vWqfsxdERyFE17Vyx_48wkSYcMW08dnz0fzGcRk5LZQMTsYG4AcTV6DEo0lAPM0cpxRNQSdw6NHxgD5DSGmOG19NRGMxXP2C-QE8xXlJ_C1_NGGFgNNCfDKj2dxCh1tupj3_ZUKADf4x0x4iz_dEWOj2JXvmTSB4dZ037PvH-293n4uHr5--3H14KJyqRSpsr6y0VkmhnKx64X2nvG1ke95t21Vt3VkxQNOZemgGKd3Q-75WQwUqK3p1w95cfE9x_rnktHpEchCCmWBeSMv8u0GKM9hcQBdnoghenyKOJm5aCn2uQx_1tQ59rkNLqXMdWff-ooOcYkWImhzC5GCPEVzS-xn_4_AXuQmZTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17839108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Purchase, C.F. ; Collins, N.C. ; Shuter, B.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Purchase, C.F. ; Collins, N.C. ; Shuter, B.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Using lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus) we examined the extent of error that is created when non-population-specific or non-sex-specific data are used to develop fishery sustainability models. To put biases in perspective we first compared relative differences in sustainable harvest rate estimates of fast and slow growing populations to the mean difference between species. Few estimates of early mortality exist for either species, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that sustainable harvest rate estimates varied by more than 90% with those available. To evaluate biases created by predicting life history traits we estimated maturation age from asymptotic length in populations whose life history parameters had been measured directly. Incorporating species-specific information produced maturation ages that were closer to those measured (mean difference 22%) than did the estimates from inter-specific relationships (mean difference 42%). This resulted in sustainability estimates from species-specific predictions being closer to those estimated using actual maturation data. In evaluating problems associated with using non-sex-specific data we found that estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates increased when female-specific life history data were used (could only be done for walleye) instead of combined-sex data (mean change in the two populations was 7%). Analyses indicate that it is desirable to collect life history data on specific populations of lake trout and walleye. If this is not possible, estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates are most influenced by variation in estimates of early mortality, followed by the taxonomic resolution used to estimate co-variation among life history traits, and finally the use of combined-sex versus female-specific data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.11.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Freshwater ; Intra-specific variation ; Lake trout ; Maximum sustainable harvest rate ; Salvelinus namaycush ; Sander vitreus ; Walleye</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2005-05, Vol.72 (2), p.141-148</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Purchase, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuter, B.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>Using lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus) we examined the extent of error that is created when non-population-specific or non-sex-specific data are used to develop fishery sustainability models. To put biases in perspective we first compared relative differences in sustainable harvest rate estimates of fast and slow growing populations to the mean difference between species. Few estimates of early mortality exist for either species, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that sustainable harvest rate estimates varied by more than 90% with those available. To evaluate biases created by predicting life history traits we estimated maturation age from asymptotic length in populations whose life history parameters had been measured directly. Incorporating species-specific information produced maturation ages that were closer to those measured (mean difference 22%) than did the estimates from inter-specific relationships (mean difference 42%). This resulted in sustainability estimates from species-specific predictions being closer to those estimated using actual maturation data. In evaluating problems associated with using non-sex-specific data we found that estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates increased when female-specific life history data were used (could only be done for walleye) instead of combined-sex data (mean change in the two populations was 7%). Analyses indicate that it is desirable to collect life history data on specific populations of lake trout and walleye. If this is not possible, estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates are most influenced by variation in estimates of early mortality, followed by the taxonomic resolution used to estimate co-variation among life history traits, and finally the use of combined-sex versus female-specific data.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Intra-specific variation</subject><subject>Lake trout</subject><subject>Maximum sustainable harvest rate</subject><subject>Salvelinus namaycush</subject><subject>Sander vitreus</subject><subject>Walleye</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O1DAQhC0EEsPCIyD5hNhDgh3n94TQavmRVuKwcLZsT1vTg5MMbieQp-FV8TBz59R9-KrU1cXYaylKKWT77lh6pEMEKish6lLKUoj2CdvJvquKtmvVU7bLXFN0vWqfsxdERyFE17Vyx_48wkSYcMW08dnz0fzGcRk5LZQMTsYG4AcTV6DEo0lAPM0cpxRNQSdw6NHxgD5DSGmOG19NRGMxXP2C-QE8xXlJ_C1_NGGFgNNCfDKj2dxCh1tupj3_ZUKADf4x0x4iz_dEWOj2JXvmTSB4dZ037PvH-293n4uHr5--3H14KJyqRSpsr6y0VkmhnKx64X2nvG1ke95t21Vt3VkxQNOZemgGKd3Q-75WQwUqK3p1w95cfE9x_rnktHpEchCCmWBeSMv8u0GKM9hcQBdnoghenyKOJm5aCn2uQx_1tQ59rkNLqXMdWff-ooOcYkWImhzC5GCPEVzS-xn_4_AXuQmZTQ</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Purchase, C.F.</creator><creator>Collins, N.C.</creator><creator>Shuter, B.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)</title><author>Purchase, C.F. ; Collins, N.C. ; Shuter, B.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Intra-specific variation</topic><topic>Lake trout</topic><topic>Maximum sustainable harvest rate</topic><topic>Salvelinus namaycush</topic><topic>Sander vitreus</topic><topic>Walleye</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Purchase, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuter, B.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Purchase, C.F.</au><au>Collins, N.C.</au><au>Shuter, B.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>141-148</pages><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><abstract>Using lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus) we examined the extent of error that is created when non-population-specific or non-sex-specific data are used to develop fishery sustainability models. To put biases in perspective we first compared relative differences in sustainable harvest rate estimates of fast and slow growing populations to the mean difference between species. Few estimates of early mortality exist for either species, and a sensitivity analysis indicated that sustainable harvest rate estimates varied by more than 90% with those available. To evaluate biases created by predicting life history traits we estimated maturation age from asymptotic length in populations whose life history parameters had been measured directly. Incorporating species-specific information produced maturation ages that were closer to those measured (mean difference 22%) than did the estimates from inter-specific relationships (mean difference 42%). This resulted in sustainability estimates from species-specific predictions being closer to those estimated using actual maturation data. In evaluating problems associated with using non-sex-specific data we found that estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates increased when female-specific life history data were used (could only be done for walleye) instead of combined-sex data (mean change in the two populations was 7%). Analyses indicate that it is desirable to collect life history data on specific populations of lake trout and walleye. If this is not possible, estimates of maximum sustainable harvest rates are most influenced by variation in estimates of early mortality, followed by the taxonomic resolution used to estimate co-variation among life history traits, and finally the use of combined-sex versus female-specific data.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2004.11.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-7836
ispartof Fisheries research, 2005-05, Vol.72 (2), p.141-148
issn 0165-7836
1872-6763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17839108
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Freshwater
Intra-specific variation
Lake trout
Maximum sustainable harvest rate
Salvelinus namaycush
Sander vitreus
Walleye
title Sensitivity of maximum sustainable harvest rates to intra-specific life history variability of lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A49%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20maximum%20sustainable%20harvest%20rates%20to%20intra-specific%20life%20history%20variability%20of%20lake%20trout%20(%20Salvelinus%20namaycush)%20and%20walleye%20(%20Sander%20vitreus)&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Purchase,%20C.F.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=141-148&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2004.11.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17839108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-b83b1bb3103c1280ff73fb516280fb672647b09e57a495911c98f84392e33c183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17839108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true