Validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of the study was to develop a Polish version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ) to evaluate sexual function in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) versus a control group. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Urogynecology Journal 2016-05, Vol.27 (5), p.781-786
Main Authors: Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia, Wydra, Dariusz Grzegorz, Smutek, Jerzy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Age Factors
Case-Control Studies
Female
Gynecology
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - complications
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - psychology
Pilot Projects
Poland
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Sexual Behavior
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - diagnosis
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translations
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - complications
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - psychology
Urology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction and hypothesis The aim of the study was to develop a Polish version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ) to evaluate sexual function in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) versus a control group. Methods Before the validation study, a pilot study of the Polish version of the PISQ was performed in 22 women with pelvic floor dysfunctions. The respondents completed the questionnaire at recruitment and 2 weeks later. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were determined. The validation study was performed in 249 sexually active women (123 with urodynamic SUI and POP; 126 healthy controls). The study group reported urinary incontinence (UI) at the urogynecological ambulatory clinic, where they underwent urogynecological and urodynamic examinations. All participants completed the questionnaire. PISQ results from both groups were compared and correlated with those of the King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and patient age. Results Test–retest reliability was good according to Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r = 0.89, p  
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-015-2883-6