Loading…
Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation
Abstract Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcanea...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2016-05, Vol.55 (3), p.572-577 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743 |
| container_end_page | 577 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 572 |
| container_title | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS Protzman, Nicole M., MS Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS Martin, Scott M., DPM Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS |
| description | Abstract Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail. The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail without formal subtalar joint cartilage resection. A multicenter medical record review was performed to identify consecutive patients. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and osseous union at the tibiotalar joint was defined as bony trabeculation across the arthrodesis site on all 3 radiographic views. Progression of joint deterioration was evaluated across time at the subtalar joint, using a modified grading system developed by Takakura et al. Forty consecutive patients (aged 61.9 ± 12.9 years; 17 men) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the pain reported preoperatively (6.4 ± 2.7), a statistically significant decline was seen in the pain experienced after surgery (1.2 ± 1.8; p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.007 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784746378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1067251615005190</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784746378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxCMEon_gC3BAPnJJ6ufETlZCoNWqtItKkWg5W479Ag7euNjOSr3zwXG0bQ8cOPkdZkae3xTFG6AVUF6fjdU4qFgxCrwCqChtnxXHwBtWMsaa5_mmoi0ZB3FUnMQ4UsrYquMviyMmOqDAuuPizzaSm7lPyqlAPns7JbJRIVmnfiD5hhF1sn4i16gxRhXuyeADubW99dnitXJaTagcWYf0M3iD0Uayt4pspxTUDs3s3OK6VtZ9JGvyZXbJapwSBnK-V25WS_yr4sWgXMTXD-9p8f3T-e3msrz6erHdrK9K3QCkcqhhpaFHRMX5MGgUvWDQm5qLmivDNe0aU7d81XPVgqm1MKiEGdp-ED1vm_q0eHfIvQv-94wxyZ2NGvMXJ_RzlNB2TduIuu2ylB2kOvgYAw7yLthdriKByoW-HOVCXy70JYDM9LPp7UP-3OfuT5ZH3Fnw_iDA3HJvMcioLU4ajQ2ZtDTe_j__wz927exk8wq_8B7j6OcwZX4SZGSSyptl_2V-4JRyWNH6L_HQrfI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784746378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS ; Protzman, Nicole M., MS ; Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS ; Martin, Scott M., DPM ; Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS ; Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS ; Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS ; Protzman, Nicole M., MS ; Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS ; Martin, Scott M., DPM ; Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS ; Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS ; Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail. The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail without formal subtalar joint cartilage resection. A multicenter medical record review was performed to identify consecutive patients. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and osseous union at the tibiotalar joint was defined as bony trabeculation across the arthrodesis site on all 3 radiographic views. Progression of joint deterioration was evaluated across time at the subtalar joint, using a modified grading system developed by Takakura et al. Forty consecutive patients (aged 61.9 ± 12.9 years; 17 men) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the pain reported preoperatively (6.4 ± 2.7), a statistically significant decline was seen in the pain experienced after surgery (1.2 ± 1.8; p < .001). The mean time to consolidated arthrodesis at the ankle joint was 3.8 ± 1.5 months. A statistically significant increase in deterioration at the subtalar joint was observed across time [t(36) = –6.200, p < .001]. Compared with previously published data of subtalar joint cartilage resection, the present study has demonstrated a similar decline in pain, with a high rate of union, and also a decrease in operative time when preparation of the subtalar joint was not performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26810128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ankle Joint - physiopathology ; Ankle Joint - surgery ; arthrodesis ; Arthrodesis - instrumentation ; Arthrodesis - methods ; Cartilage, Articular - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; end-stage osteoarthritis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Humans ; intramedullary nail ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement ; pantalar ; Radiography - methods ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; subtalar joint ; Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Subtalar Joint - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2016-05, Vol.55 (3), p.572-577</ispartof><rights>American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzman, Nicole M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Scott M., DPM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><title>Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail. The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail without formal subtalar joint cartilage resection. A multicenter medical record review was performed to identify consecutive patients. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and osseous union at the tibiotalar joint was defined as bony trabeculation across the arthrodesis site on all 3 radiographic views. Progression of joint deterioration was evaluated across time at the subtalar joint, using a modified grading system developed by Takakura et al. Forty consecutive patients (aged 61.9 ± 12.9 years; 17 men) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the pain reported preoperatively (6.4 ± 2.7), a statistically significant decline was seen in the pain experienced after surgery (1.2 ± 1.8; p < .001). The mean time to consolidated arthrodesis at the ankle joint was 3.8 ± 1.5 months. A statistically significant increase in deterioration at the subtalar joint was observed across time [t(36) = –6.200, p < .001]. Compared with previously published data of subtalar joint cartilage resection, the present study has demonstrated a similar decline in pain, with a high rate of union, and also a decrease in operative time when preparation of the subtalar joint was not performed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - surgery</subject><subject>arthrodesis</subject><subject>Arthrodesis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthrodesis - methods</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>end-stage osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intramedullary nail</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>pantalar</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>subtalar joint</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxCMEon_gC3BAPnJJ6ufETlZCoNWqtItKkWg5W479Ag7euNjOSr3zwXG0bQ8cOPkdZkae3xTFG6AVUF6fjdU4qFgxCrwCqChtnxXHwBtWMsaa5_mmoi0ZB3FUnMQ4UsrYquMviyMmOqDAuuPizzaSm7lPyqlAPns7JbJRIVmnfiD5hhF1sn4i16gxRhXuyeADubW99dnitXJaTagcWYf0M3iD0Uayt4pspxTUDs3s3OK6VtZ9JGvyZXbJapwSBnK-V25WS_yr4sWgXMTXD-9p8f3T-e3msrz6erHdrK9K3QCkcqhhpaFHRMX5MGgUvWDQm5qLmivDNe0aU7d81XPVgqm1MKiEGdp-ED1vm_q0eHfIvQv-94wxyZ2NGvMXJ_RzlNB2TduIuu2ylB2kOvgYAw7yLthdriKByoW-HOVCXy70JYDM9LPp7UP-3OfuT5ZH3Fnw_iDA3HJvMcioLU4ajQ2ZtDTe_j__wz927exk8wq_8B7j6OcwZX4SZGSSyptl_2V-4JRyWNH6L_HQrfI</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS</creator><creator>Protzman, Nicole M., MS</creator><creator>Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS</creator><creator>Martin, Scott M., DPM</creator><creator>Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS</creator><creator>Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS</creator><creator>Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation</title><author>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS ; Protzman, Nicole M., MS ; Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS ; Martin, Scott M., DPM ; Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS ; Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS ; Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - surgery</topic><topic>arthrodesis</topic><topic>Arthrodesis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthrodesis - methods</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>end-stage osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intramedullary nail</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>pantalar</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>subtalar joint</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzman, Nicole M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Scott M., DPM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulhern, Jennifer L., DPM, AACFAS</au><au>Protzman, Nicole M., MS</au><au>Levene, Maxwell J., DPM, AACFAS</au><au>Martin, Scott M., DPM</au><au>Fleming, Justin J., DPM, FACFAS</au><au>Clements, J. Randolph, DPM, FACFAS</au><au>Brigido, Stephen A., DPM, FACFAS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>572-577</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Abstract Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing is traditionally performed with formal preparation of both the subtalar and ankle joints. However, we believe that subtalar joint preparation is not necessary to achieve satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail. The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail without formal subtalar joint cartilage resection. A multicenter medical record review was performed to identify consecutive patients. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and osseous union at the tibiotalar joint was defined as bony trabeculation across the arthrodesis site on all 3 radiographic views. Progression of joint deterioration was evaluated across time at the subtalar joint, using a modified grading system developed by Takakura et al. Forty consecutive patients (aged 61.9 ± 12.9 years; 17 men) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the pain reported preoperatively (6.4 ± 2.7), a statistically significant decline was seen in the pain experienced after surgery (1.2 ± 1.8; p < .001). The mean time to consolidated arthrodesis at the ankle joint was 3.8 ± 1.5 months. A statistically significant increase in deterioration at the subtalar joint was observed across time [t(36) = –6.200, p < .001]. Compared with previously published data of subtalar joint cartilage resection, the present study has demonstrated a similar decline in pain, with a high rate of union, and also a decrease in operative time when preparation of the subtalar joint was not performed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26810128</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1067-2516 |
| ispartof | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2016-05, Vol.55 (3), p.572-577 |
| issn | 1067-2516 1542-2224 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784746378 |
| source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
| subjects | Aged Ankle Joint - physiopathology Ankle Joint - surgery arthrodesis Arthrodesis - instrumentation Arthrodesis - methods Cartilage, Articular - surgery Cohort Studies end-stage osteoarthritis Female Follow-Up Studies Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods Humans intramedullary nail Male Middle Aged Orthopedics Pain Measurement pantalar Radiography - methods Recovery of Function Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment subtalar joint Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging Subtalar Joint - surgery Treatment Outcome |
| title | Is Subtalar Joint Cartilage Resection Necessary for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis via Intramedullary Nail? A Multicenter Evaluation |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A09%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Subtalar%20Joint%20Cartilage%20Resection%20Necessary%20for%20Tibiotalocalcaneal%20Arthrodesis%20via%20Intramedullary%20Nail?%20A%20Multicenter%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Mulhern,%20Jennifer%20L.,%20DPM,%20AACFAS&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=572-577&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784746378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-f319c1beeea55ffce6b621bd35635ad5c084d3759b5a71d3c6dea6df7bf6b5743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784746378&rft_id=info:pmid/26810128&rfr_iscdi=true |