Peer review: Troubled from the start

Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 2016-04, Vol.532 (7599), p.306-308
Main Author: Csiszar, Alex
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
706/648/479
706/648/479/429
706/689/236
comment
Confidentiality
Consensus
Dissent and Disputes
History, 17th Century
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humanities and Social Sciences
London
multidisciplinary
Peer Review, Research - methods
Peer Review, Research - standards
Peer Review, Research - trends
Periodicals as Topic - history
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Research Report - history
Science
Societies, Scientific - organization & administration
Societies, Scientific - standards
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/532306a