Loading…
Peer review: Troubled from the start
Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature (London) 2016-04, Vol.532 (7599), p.306-308 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13 |
| container_end_page | 308 |
| container_issue | 7599 |
| container_start_page | 306 |
| container_title | Nature (London) |
| container_volume | 532 |
| creator | Csiszar, Alex |
| description | Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/532306a |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784749877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1784749877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUg_gHKgARL4Bw7_mBDFV9SJRjKbNnOGVolTbETEP-eoBYYmG64p3e6R8gxhQsKTF2WrGAg7A4ZUy5FzoWSu2QMUKgcFBMjcpDSEgBKKvk-GRWSUiqoGJPTJ8SYRXxf4MdVNo9t72qsshDbJuteMUudjd0h2Qu2Tni0nRPyfHszn97ns8e7h-n1LPeFKGzuVUDLKx8EauUc40KWlXWUC6-d07oUwMFWnOlAAVFLXYYAA6SFdNJTNiHnG-86tm89ps40i-Sxru0K2z4ZKhWXXCspB_Rsg_rYphQxmHVcNDZ-GgrmO4nZJhnIk620dw1Wv9xPg7-raVitXjCaZdvH1fDoP9cX9bBmGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784749877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer review: Troubled from the start</title><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Csiszar, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Csiszar, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/532306a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27111616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>706/648/479 ; 706/648/479/429 ; 706/689/236 ; comment ; Confidentiality ; Consensus ; Dissent and Disputes ; History, 17th Century ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; London ; multidisciplinary ; Peer Review, Research - methods ; Peer Review, Research - standards ; Peer Review, Research - trends ; Periodicals as Topic - history ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Research Report - history ; Science ; Societies, Scientific - organization & administration ; Societies, Scientific - standards</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2016-04, Vol.532 (7599), p.306-308</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27111616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Csiszar, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Peer review: Troubled from the start</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.</description><subject>706/648/479</subject><subject>706/648/479/429</subject><subject>706/689/236</subject><subject>comment</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Dissent and Disputes</subject><subject>History, 17th Century</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - methods</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - standards</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - trends</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - history</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Research Report - history</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Societies, Scientific - organization & administration</subject><subject>Societies, Scientific - standards</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUg_gHKgARL4Bw7_mBDFV9SJRjKbNnOGVolTbETEP-eoBYYmG64p3e6R8gxhQsKTF2WrGAg7A4ZUy5FzoWSu2QMUKgcFBMjcpDSEgBKKvk-GRWSUiqoGJPTJ8SYRXxf4MdVNo9t72qsshDbJuteMUudjd0h2Qu2Tni0nRPyfHszn97ns8e7h-n1LPeFKGzuVUDLKx8EauUc40KWlXWUC6-d07oUwMFWnOlAAVFLXYYAA6SFdNJTNiHnG-86tm89ps40i-Sxru0K2z4ZKhWXXCspB_Rsg_rYphQxmHVcNDZ-GgrmO4nZJhnIk620dw1Wv9xPg7-raVitXjCaZdvH1fDoP9cX9bBmGg</recordid><startdate>20160421</startdate><enddate>20160421</enddate><creator>Csiszar, Alex</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160421</creationdate><title>Peer review: Troubled from the start</title><author>Csiszar, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>706/648/479</topic><topic>706/648/479/429</topic><topic>706/689/236</topic><topic>comment</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Dissent and Disputes</topic><topic>History, 17th Century</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - methods</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - standards</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - trends</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - history</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Research Report - history</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Societies, Scientific - organization & administration</topic><topic>Societies, Scientific - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Csiszar, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Csiszar, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer review: Troubled from the start</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2016-04-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>532</volume><issue>7599</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>306-308</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>Pivotal moments in the history of academic refereeing have occurred at times when the public status of science was being renegotiated, explains Alex Csiszar.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27111616</pmid><doi>10.1038/532306a</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
| ispartof | Nature (London), 2016-04, Vol.532 (7599), p.306-308 |
| issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784749877 |
| source | Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
| subjects | 706/648/479 706/648/479/429 706/689/236 comment Confidentiality Consensus Dissent and Disputes History, 17th Century History, 19th Century History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Humanities and Social Sciences London multidisciplinary Peer Review, Research - methods Peer Review, Research - standards Peer Review, Research - trends Periodicals as Topic - history Periodicals as Topic - standards Research Report - history Science Societies, Scientific - organization & administration Societies, Scientific - standards |
| title | Peer review: Troubled from the start |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20review:%20Troubled%20from%20the%20start&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Csiszar,%20Alex&rft.date=2016-04-21&rft.volume=532&rft.issue=7599&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=306-308&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/532306a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784749877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262a-c8fea4dcf6e98bb34675dab146c9bb9956040ad439f10ee9795ff0675967b7c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784749877&rft_id=info:pmid/27111616&rfr_iscdi=true |