Loading…

Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits

The neophobia threshold hypothesis (NTH) suggests that the acquisition and maintenance of a high behavioral and ecological flexibility in the evolutionary and adaptive history of a species is the consequence of lower levels of neophobia towards new micro‐habitats and of dietary wariness of novel foo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of avian biology 2016-03, Vol.47 (2), p.245-251
Main Authors: Camín, Sergio R., Martín-Albarracín, Valeria, Jefferies, Milagros, Marone, Luis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903
container_end_page 251
container_issue 2
container_start_page 245
container_title Journal of avian biology
container_volume 47
creator Camín, Sergio R.
Martín-Albarracín, Valeria
Jefferies, Milagros
Marone, Luis
description The neophobia threshold hypothesis (NTH) suggests that the acquisition and maintenance of a high behavioral and ecological flexibility in the evolutionary and adaptive history of a species is the consequence of lower levels of neophobia towards new micro‐habitats and of dietary wariness of novel foods. To test this idea we assessed the degree of neophobia and dietary wariness in two seed‐eating bird species with contrasting degrees of ecological flexibility that inhabit the central Monte desert (Argentina): a grass‐seed specialist, the many‐colored chaco‐finch, and a generalist feeder, the rufous‐collared sparrow. We expected that both species would exhibit neophobia and wariness when faced with new foraging opportunities but that the rufous‐collared sparrow would be less neophobic and less wary than the specialized many‐colored chaco‐finch. Experimental indicators of neophobia and dietary wariness included willingness to eat near novel objects and willingness to eat novel seeds, respectively. Both species showed similar levels of reluctance to novelty, although the sparrow could be slightly more reluctant than the finch. Contrary to our predictions, the sparrow was neither less hesitant nor faster or greedier than the finch. This experimental evidence does not support a negative relationship between neophobia/wariness and ecological flexibility in these two seed‐eating birds and it coincides with the growing evidence that challenges the NTH. Some of our results provide support for the dangerous niche hypothesis, especially as the rufous‐collared sparrow, that feeds on more diverse and potentially dangerous food, showed higher levels of neophobia in some cases. Although the idea of neophobia and wariness being plausible causes of ecological specialization sounds attractive, the current situation calls for further research so that the causes of ecological flexibility in granivorous birds can be better understood.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jav.00697
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785231300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>javianbiology.47.2.245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>javianbiology.47.2.245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10tFuFCEUBuCJ0cS1euETSOKNxkwFhhmYK7OpWjUbTVOrvSNnGNhlpcMKrLtz10fwGX0S2Y6piYnckMDHSc75KYrHBB-TvF6u4ccxxk3L7xQz0mBcYiYu7xYz3GJRClHz-8WDGNcY44q29ay4fu3RoP1m5TsLCIYe9VYnCCPaQbCDjhHp_caBHZBW3vmlVeCQcXpvO-tsGl-h-ZDfgRujjWhn0wqlnUdR6_7X9U8NyQ5L1NnQR-QNUn5IAeLN4Qo6m-LD4p4BF_WjP_tRcfH2zeeTd-Xi0-n7k_miVKxteElMD4TVWkEPQtMekx46xk2rDFPAmlao2nS4Mqw1tWYtqWi-bLASRlDa4uqoeDbV3QT_fatjklc2Ku0c5Pa3URIualqRCh_o03_o2m9DbvGgOGsEFphm9XxSKvgYgzZyE-xVnpwkWB6ykDkLeZNFtuVkd9bp8f9Qfph_mfyLya9j8uHWZ2dh6Owhh1EyLqmkrP5b3cak97cawjfZ8IrX8uvHU3lZLeozes7lWfZPJm_AS1gGG-XFOcWH70Ia0eQx_Ab-ELWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774680802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><creator>Camín, Sergio R. ; Martín-Albarracín, Valeria ; Jefferies, Milagros ; Marone, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Camín, Sergio R. ; Martín-Albarracín, Valeria ; Jefferies, Milagros ; Marone, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>The neophobia threshold hypothesis (NTH) suggests that the acquisition and maintenance of a high behavioral and ecological flexibility in the evolutionary and adaptive history of a species is the consequence of lower levels of neophobia towards new micro‐habitats and of dietary wariness of novel foods. To test this idea we assessed the degree of neophobia and dietary wariness in two seed‐eating bird species with contrasting degrees of ecological flexibility that inhabit the central Monte desert (Argentina): a grass‐seed specialist, the many‐colored chaco‐finch, and a generalist feeder, the rufous‐collared sparrow. We expected that both species would exhibit neophobia and wariness when faced with new foraging opportunities but that the rufous‐collared sparrow would be less neophobic and less wary than the specialized many‐colored chaco‐finch. Experimental indicators of neophobia and dietary wariness included willingness to eat near novel objects and willingness to eat novel seeds, respectively. Both species showed similar levels of reluctance to novelty, although the sparrow could be slightly more reluctant than the finch. Contrary to our predictions, the sparrow was neither less hesitant nor faster or greedier than the finch. This experimental evidence does not support a negative relationship between neophobia/wariness and ecological flexibility in these two seed‐eating birds and it coincides with the growing evidence that challenges the NTH. Some of our results provide support for the dangerous niche hypothesis, especially as the rufous‐collared sparrow, that feeds on more diverse and potentially dangerous food, showed higher levels of neophobia in some cases. Although the idea of neophobia and wariness being plausible causes of ecological specialization sounds attractive, the current situation calls for further research so that the causes of ecological flexibility in granivorous birds can be better understood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0908-8857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-048X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jav.00697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aves</subject><ispartof>Journal of avian biology, 2016-03, Vol.47 (2), p.245-251</ispartof><rights>2015 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Journal of Avian Biology © 2016 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/javianbiology.47.2.245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/javianbiology.47.2.245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11560,27922,27923,46050,46474,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjav.00697$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camín, Sergio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Albarracín, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferies, Milagros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marone, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits</title><title>Journal of avian biology</title><addtitle>J Avian Biol</addtitle><description>The neophobia threshold hypothesis (NTH) suggests that the acquisition and maintenance of a high behavioral and ecological flexibility in the evolutionary and adaptive history of a species is the consequence of lower levels of neophobia towards new micro‐habitats and of dietary wariness of novel foods. To test this idea we assessed the degree of neophobia and dietary wariness in two seed‐eating bird species with contrasting degrees of ecological flexibility that inhabit the central Monte desert (Argentina): a grass‐seed specialist, the many‐colored chaco‐finch, and a generalist feeder, the rufous‐collared sparrow. We expected that both species would exhibit neophobia and wariness when faced with new foraging opportunities but that the rufous‐collared sparrow would be less neophobic and less wary than the specialized many‐colored chaco‐finch. Experimental indicators of neophobia and dietary wariness included willingness to eat near novel objects and willingness to eat novel seeds, respectively. Both species showed similar levels of reluctance to novelty, although the sparrow could be slightly more reluctant than the finch. Contrary to our predictions, the sparrow was neither less hesitant nor faster or greedier than the finch. This experimental evidence does not support a negative relationship between neophobia/wariness and ecological flexibility in these two seed‐eating birds and it coincides with the growing evidence that challenges the NTH. Some of our results provide support for the dangerous niche hypothesis, especially as the rufous‐collared sparrow, that feeds on more diverse and potentially dangerous food, showed higher levels of neophobia in some cases. Although the idea of neophobia and wariness being plausible causes of ecological specialization sounds attractive, the current situation calls for further research so that the causes of ecological flexibility in granivorous birds can be better understood.</description><subject>Aves</subject><issn>0908-8857</issn><issn>1600-048X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10tFuFCEUBuCJ0cS1euETSOKNxkwFhhmYK7OpWjUbTVOrvSNnGNhlpcMKrLtz10fwGX0S2Y6piYnckMDHSc75KYrHBB-TvF6u4ccxxk3L7xQz0mBcYiYu7xYz3GJRClHz-8WDGNcY44q29ay4fu3RoP1m5TsLCIYe9VYnCCPaQbCDjhHp_caBHZBW3vmlVeCQcXpvO-tsGl-h-ZDfgRujjWhn0wqlnUdR6_7X9U8NyQ5L1NnQR-QNUn5IAeLN4Qo6m-LD4p4BF_WjP_tRcfH2zeeTd-Xi0-n7k_miVKxteElMD4TVWkEPQtMekx46xk2rDFPAmlao2nS4Mqw1tWYtqWi-bLASRlDa4uqoeDbV3QT_fatjklc2Ku0c5Pa3URIualqRCh_o03_o2m9DbvGgOGsEFphm9XxSKvgYgzZyE-xVnpwkWB6ykDkLeZNFtuVkd9bp8f9Qfph_mfyLya9j8uHWZ2dh6Owhh1EyLqmkrP5b3cak97cawjfZ8IrX8uvHU3lZLeozes7lWfZPJm_AS1gGG-XFOcWH70Ia0eQx_Ab-ELWo</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Camín, Sergio R.</creator><creator>Martín-Albarracín, Valeria</creator><creator>Jefferies, Milagros</creator><creator>Marone, Luis</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Nordic Society Oikos</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits</title><author>Camín, Sergio R. ; Martín-Albarracín, Valeria ; Jefferies, Milagros ; Marone, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camín, Sergio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Albarracín, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferies, Milagros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marone, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camín, Sergio R.</au><au>Martín-Albarracín, Valeria</au><au>Jefferies, Milagros</au><au>Marone, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Avian Biol</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>245-251</pages><issn>0908-8857</issn><eissn>1600-048X</eissn><abstract>The neophobia threshold hypothesis (NTH) suggests that the acquisition and maintenance of a high behavioral and ecological flexibility in the evolutionary and adaptive history of a species is the consequence of lower levels of neophobia towards new micro‐habitats and of dietary wariness of novel foods. To test this idea we assessed the degree of neophobia and dietary wariness in two seed‐eating bird species with contrasting degrees of ecological flexibility that inhabit the central Monte desert (Argentina): a grass‐seed specialist, the many‐colored chaco‐finch, and a generalist feeder, the rufous‐collared sparrow. We expected that both species would exhibit neophobia and wariness when faced with new foraging opportunities but that the rufous‐collared sparrow would be less neophobic and less wary than the specialized many‐colored chaco‐finch. Experimental indicators of neophobia and dietary wariness included willingness to eat near novel objects and willingness to eat novel seeds, respectively. Both species showed similar levels of reluctance to novelty, although the sparrow could be slightly more reluctant than the finch. Contrary to our predictions, the sparrow was neither less hesitant nor faster or greedier than the finch. This experimental evidence does not support a negative relationship between neophobia/wariness and ecological flexibility in these two seed‐eating birds and it coincides with the growing evidence that challenges the NTH. Some of our results provide support for the dangerous niche hypothesis, especially as the rufous‐collared sparrow, that feeds on more diverse and potentially dangerous food, showed higher levels of neophobia in some cases. Although the idea of neophobia and wariness being plausible causes of ecological specialization sounds attractive, the current situation calls for further research so that the causes of ecological flexibility in granivorous birds can be better understood.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jav.00697</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0908-8857
ispartof Journal of avian biology, 2016-03, Vol.47 (2), p.245-251
issn 0908-8857
1600-048X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785231300
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection
subjects Aves
title Do neophobia and dietary wariness explain ecological flexibility? An analysis with two seed‐eating birds of contrasting habits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20neophobia%20and%20dietary%20wariness%20explain%20ecological%20flexibility?%20An%20analysis%20with%20two%20seed%E2%80%90eating%20birds%20of%20contrasting%20habits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20avian%20biology&rft.au=Cam%C3%ADn,%20Sergio%20R.&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=245-251&rft.issn=0908-8857&rft.eissn=1600-048X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jav.00697&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3Ejavianbiology.47.2.245%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-1fda145ecada8e2d01dab47f9cf4ca4698c5fb03f49f5e491327f960c8f822903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774680802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=javianbiology.47.2.245&rfr_iscdi=true