Loading…
SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION
Despite the potential for rapid evolution, stasis is commonly observed over geological timescales—the so-called "paradox of stasis." This paradox would be resolved if stabilizing selection were common, but stabilizing selection is infrequently detected in natural populations. We hypothesiz...
Saved in:
Published in: | Evolution 2014-02, Vol.68 (2), p.483-500 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 500 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Evolution |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Haller, Benjamin C. Hendry, Andrew P. |
description | Despite the potential for rapid evolution, stasis is commonly observed over geological timescales—the so-called "paradox of stasis." This paradox would be resolved if stabilizing selection were common, but stabilizing selection is infrequently detected in natural populations. We hypothesize a simple solution to this apparent disconnect: stabilizing selection is hard to detect empirically once populations have adapted to a fitness peak. To test this hypothesis, we developed an individual-based model of a population evolving under an invariant stabilizing fitness function. Stabilizing selection on the population was infrequently detected in an "empirical" sampling protocol, because (1) trait variation was low relative to the fitness peak breadth; (2) nonselective deaths masked selection; (3) populations wandered around the fitness peak; and (4) sample sizes were typically too small. Moreover, the addition of negative frequency-dependent selection further hindered detection by flattening or even dimpling the fitness peak, a phenomenon we term "squashed stabilizing selection." Our model demonstrates that stabilizing selection provides a plausible resolution to the paradox of stasis despite its infrequent detection in nature. The key reason is that selection "erases its traces": once populations have adapted to a fitness peak, they are no longer expected to exhibit detectable stabilizing selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/evo.12275 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785233289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24032770</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24032770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j4005-ae08edd60d379143993e7ae4f806dd4a37d4d5db3dd78e21ceded67114aef84d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9PwkAQxTdGI4ge_ACaJl68FGb_dbveKi3QpFK1haiXprhLAgGKLWj49raAxnjRucxk5vdeMnkInWNo4rJa-j1rYkIEP0B1zLltcotZh6gOgJlJbQI1dFIUUwCQHMtjVCMMA8GC1NFzFAZDv9814p5n3DuPjhs-GWHHiGIn8qMbI3oYOFHPc6vFrR_4LxUbeYHXjv2wbzh9d6sM_Ds_jiqh68W72yk6GqezQp_tewMNOl7c7plB2PXbTmBOGQA3Uw22VsoCRYXEjEpJtUg1G9tgKcVSKhRTXI2oUsLWBL9qpZUlMGapHttM0Qa63vku8-xtrYtVMp8Ur3o2Sxc6WxcJFjYnlBJb_o1y4JRa7D8ok0QQykrrBrr6hU6zdb4of64oJiUwaZXU5Z5aj-ZaJct8Mk_zTfIVRQm0dsDHZKY333cMSZVxUmacbDNOvGG4HUrFxU4xLVZZ_sMRKBEC6CfP-5gt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1494990496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Haller, Benjamin C. ; Hendry, Andrew P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haller, Benjamin C. ; Hendry, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the potential for rapid evolution, stasis is commonly observed over geological timescales—the so-called "paradox of stasis." This paradox would be resolved if stabilizing selection were common, but stabilizing selection is infrequently detected in natural populations. We hypothesize a simple solution to this apparent disconnect: stabilizing selection is hard to detect empirically once populations have adapted to a fitness peak. To test this hypothesis, we developed an individual-based model of a population evolving under an invariant stabilizing fitness function. Stabilizing selection on the population was infrequently detected in an "empirical" sampling protocol, because (1) trait variation was low relative to the fitness peak breadth; (2) nonselective deaths masked selection; (3) populations wandered around the fitness peak; and (4) sample sizes were typically too small. Moreover, the addition of negative frequency-dependent selection further hindered detection by flattening or even dimpling the fitness peak, a phenomenon we term "squashed stabilizing selection." Our model demonstrates that stabilizing selection provides a plausible resolution to the paradox of stasis despite its infrequent detection in nature. The key reason is that selection "erases its traces": once populations have adapted to a fitness peak, they are no longer expected to exhibit detectable stabilizing selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/evo.12275</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24102172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Biodiversity ; Biological variation ; Competition ; directional selection ; Disruptive selection ; Ecological competition ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary biology ; Evolutionary genetics ; fitness landscape ; frequency‐dependent selection ; Genetic Fitness ; Genetic Variation ; Models, Genetic ; Morphology ; Mortality ; Phenotypic traits ; Sample size ; selection gradient ; Selection, Genetic ; Stabilizing selection ; Statistical variance</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2014-02, Vol.68 (2), p.483-500</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>2013 The Author(s). © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24032770$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24032770$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haller, Benjamin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendry, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><title>SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Despite the potential for rapid evolution, stasis is commonly observed over geological timescales—the so-called "paradox of stasis." This paradox would be resolved if stabilizing selection were common, but stabilizing selection is infrequently detected in natural populations. We hypothesize a simple solution to this apparent disconnect: stabilizing selection is hard to detect empirically once populations have adapted to a fitness peak. To test this hypothesis, we developed an individual-based model of a population evolving under an invariant stabilizing fitness function. Stabilizing selection on the population was infrequently detected in an "empirical" sampling protocol, because (1) trait variation was low relative to the fitness peak breadth; (2) nonselective deaths masked selection; (3) populations wandered around the fitness peak; and (4) sample sizes were typically too small. Moreover, the addition of negative frequency-dependent selection further hindered detection by flattening or even dimpling the fitness peak, a phenomenon we term "squashed stabilizing selection." Our model demonstrates that stabilizing selection provides a plausible resolution to the paradox of stasis despite its infrequent detection in nature. The key reason is that selection "erases its traces": once populations have adapted to a fitness peak, they are no longer expected to exhibit detectable stabilizing selection.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological variation</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>directional selection</subject><subject>Disruptive selection</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>fitness landscape</subject><subject>frequency‐dependent selection</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Phenotypic traits</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>selection gradient</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Stabilizing selection</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9PwkAQxTdGI4ge_ACaJl68FGb_dbveKi3QpFK1haiXprhLAgGKLWj49raAxnjRucxk5vdeMnkInWNo4rJa-j1rYkIEP0B1zLltcotZh6gOgJlJbQI1dFIUUwCQHMtjVCMMA8GC1NFzFAZDv9814p5n3DuPjhs-GWHHiGIn8qMbI3oYOFHPc6vFrR_4LxUbeYHXjv2wbzh9d6sM_Ds_jiqh68W72yk6GqezQp_tewMNOl7c7plB2PXbTmBOGQA3Uw22VsoCRYXEjEpJtUg1G9tgKcVSKhRTXI2oUsLWBL9qpZUlMGapHttM0Qa63vku8-xtrYtVMp8Ur3o2Sxc6WxcJFjYnlBJb_o1y4JRa7D8ok0QQykrrBrr6hU6zdb4of64oJiUwaZXU5Z5aj-ZaJct8Mk_zTfIVRQm0dsDHZKY333cMSZVxUmacbDNOvGG4HUrFxU4xLVZZ_sMRKBEC6CfP-5gt</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Haller, Benjamin C.</creator><creator>Hendry, Andrew P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION</title><author>Haller, Benjamin C. ; Hendry, Andrew P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j4005-ae08edd60d379143993e7ae4f806dd4a37d4d5db3dd78e21ceded67114aef84d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological variation</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>directional selection</topic><topic>Disruptive selection</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>fitness landscape</topic><topic>frequency‐dependent selection</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Phenotypic traits</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>selection gradient</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Stabilizing selection</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haller, Benjamin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendry, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haller, Benjamin C.</au><au>Hendry, Andrew P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>483-500</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Despite the potential for rapid evolution, stasis is commonly observed over geological timescales—the so-called "paradox of stasis." This paradox would be resolved if stabilizing selection were common, but stabilizing selection is infrequently detected in natural populations. We hypothesize a simple solution to this apparent disconnect: stabilizing selection is hard to detect empirically once populations have adapted to a fitness peak. To test this hypothesis, we developed an individual-based model of a population evolving under an invariant stabilizing fitness function. Stabilizing selection on the population was infrequently detected in an "empirical" sampling protocol, because (1) trait variation was low relative to the fitness peak breadth; (2) nonselective deaths masked selection; (3) populations wandered around the fitness peak; and (4) sample sizes were typically too small. Moreover, the addition of negative frequency-dependent selection further hindered detection by flattening or even dimpling the fitness peak, a phenomenon we term "squashed stabilizing selection." Our model demonstrates that stabilizing selection provides a plausible resolution to the paradox of stasis despite its infrequent detection in nature. The key reason is that selection "erases its traces": once populations have adapted to a fitness peak, they are no longer expected to exhibit detectable stabilizing selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24102172</pmid><doi>10.1111/evo.12275</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-3820 |
ispartof | Evolution, 2014-02, Vol.68 (2), p.483-500 |
issn | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785233289 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Architecture Biodiversity Biological variation Competition directional selection Disruptive selection Ecological competition Evolution Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary biology Evolutionary genetics fitness landscape frequency‐dependent selection Genetic Fitness Genetic Variation Models, Genetic Morphology Mortality Phenotypic traits Sample size selection gradient Selection, Genetic Stabilizing selection Statistical variance |
title | SOLVING THE PARADOX OF STASIS: SQUASHED STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE LIMITS OF DETECTION |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A12%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SOLVING%20THE%20PARADOX%20OF%20STASIS:%20SQUASHED%20STABILIZING%20SELECTION%20AND%20THE%20LIMITS%20OF%20DETECTION&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Haller,%20Benjamin%20C.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=483-500&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/evo.12275&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24032770%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j4005-ae08edd60d379143993e7ae4f806dd4a37d4d5db3dd78e21ceded67114aef84d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1494990496&rft_id=info:pmid/24102172&rft_jstor_id=24032770&rfr_iscdi=true |