Loading…
Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study
•A critical evaluation of an on-farm, auto-thermal gasification unit is proposed.•The low ash melting behaviour of the feedstock demanded low temperature operation.•The cold gas efficiency was low (0.26) compared to wood fed gasification.•The tar/water emulsion had a pH of 9.6 and nitrogen content o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2016-04, Vol.50, p.324-333 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003 |
container_end_page | 333 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 324 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Taupe, N.C. Lynch, D. Wnetrzak, R. Kwapinska, M. Kwapinski, W. Leahy, J.J. |
description | •A critical evaluation of an on-farm, auto-thermal gasification unit is proposed.•The low ash melting behaviour of the feedstock demanded low temperature operation.•The cold gas efficiency was low (0.26) compared to wood fed gasification.•The tar/water emulsion had a pH of 9.6 and nitrogen content of 9.2wt.%db.•Zn and Cu exceeded the concentration limits for biochar certification.
Farm and animal wastes are increasingly being investigated for thermochemical conversion, such as gasification, due to the urgent necessity of finding new waste treatment options. We report on an investigation of the use of a farm-scale, auto-thermal gasification system for the production of a heating gas using poultry litter (PL) as a feedstock. The gasification process was robust and reliable. The PL’s ash melting temperature was 639°C, therefore the reactor temperature was kept around this value. As a result of the low reactor temperature the process performance parameters were low, with a cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 0.26 and a carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 0.44. The calorific value of the clean product gas was 3.39MJm−3N (LHV). The tar was collected as an emulsion containing 87wt.% water and the extracted organic compounds were identified. The residual char exceeds thresholds for Zn and Cu to obtain European biochar certification; however, has potential to be classified as a pyrogenic carbonaceous material (PCM), which resembles a high nutrient biochar. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.036 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785240028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X16300836</els_id><sourcerecordid>1785240028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtqFEEUQAtRzCT6ByK1dNPtrWd3b4QQogYCbgy4K-5U35IauqfHqmpldvkH_9AvscJEl7q6D859cBh7JaAVIOzbXfsD84z7VtaqBdmCsk_YRvTd0Eht7FO2gcHYBoz6csbOc94BCN0LeM7OpB1q1sGGXd8dxoSh8K-YY4geS1z2fAn8sKxTSUc-xVIocSw8YJqb7HEi_uv-J7_kHjPxXNbx-II9CzhlevkYL9jd--vPVx-b208fbq4ubxtvwJYGTTBKD7SFoDRJNYIVurZ6r0xnZa_QD2YIKkDnu_rhdouKUEhPqI0AUBfszWnvIS3fVsrFzTF7mibc07JmJ7reSA1QV_0f7axVoLWtqD6hPi05JwrukOKM6egEuAfXbudOrt2DawfSVdd17PXjhXU70_h36I_cCrw7AVSVfI-UXPaR9p7GmMgXNy7x3xd-A1swkRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776630446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Taupe, N.C. ; Lynch, D. ; Wnetrzak, R. ; Kwapinska, M. ; Kwapinski, W. ; Leahy, J.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taupe, N.C. ; Lynch, D. ; Wnetrzak, R. ; Kwapinska, M. ; Kwapinski, W. ; Leahy, J.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•A critical evaluation of an on-farm, auto-thermal gasification unit is proposed.•The low ash melting behaviour of the feedstock demanded low temperature operation.•The cold gas efficiency was low (0.26) compared to wood fed gasification.•The tar/water emulsion had a pH of 9.6 and nitrogen content of 9.2wt.%db.•Zn and Cu exceeded the concentration limits for biochar certification.
Farm and animal wastes are increasingly being investigated for thermochemical conversion, such as gasification, due to the urgent necessity of finding new waste treatment options. We report on an investigation of the use of a farm-scale, auto-thermal gasification system for the production of a heating gas using poultry litter (PL) as a feedstock. The gasification process was robust and reliable. The PL’s ash melting temperature was 639°C, therefore the reactor temperature was kept around this value. As a result of the low reactor temperature the process performance parameters were low, with a cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 0.26 and a carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 0.44. The calorific value of the clean product gas was 3.39MJm−3N (LHV). The tar was collected as an emulsion containing 87wt.% water and the extracted organic compounds were identified. The residual char exceeds thresholds for Zn and Cu to obtain European biochar certification; however, has potential to be classified as a pyrogenic carbonaceous material (PCM), which resembles a high nutrient biochar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26948170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animal waste ; Animals ; Auto-thermal gasification ; Carbon ; Chickens ; Cold gas ; Combustion ; Conversion ; Energy recovery ; Farms ; Floors and Floorcoverings ; Gases - analysis ; Gasification ; Hot Temperature ; Litter ; Poultry ; Poultry litter char ; Reactors ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; Thermal treatment</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-04, Vol.50, p.324-333</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26948170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taupe, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wnetrzak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapinska, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapinski, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leahy, J.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•A critical evaluation of an on-farm, auto-thermal gasification unit is proposed.•The low ash melting behaviour of the feedstock demanded low temperature operation.•The cold gas efficiency was low (0.26) compared to wood fed gasification.•The tar/water emulsion had a pH of 9.6 and nitrogen content of 9.2wt.%db.•Zn and Cu exceeded the concentration limits for biochar certification.
Farm and animal wastes are increasingly being investigated for thermochemical conversion, such as gasification, due to the urgent necessity of finding new waste treatment options. We report on an investigation of the use of a farm-scale, auto-thermal gasification system for the production of a heating gas using poultry litter (PL) as a feedstock. The gasification process was robust and reliable. The PL’s ash melting temperature was 639°C, therefore the reactor temperature was kept around this value. As a result of the low reactor temperature the process performance parameters were low, with a cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 0.26 and a carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 0.44. The calorific value of the clean product gas was 3.39MJm−3N (LHV). The tar was collected as an emulsion containing 87wt.% water and the extracted organic compounds were identified. The residual char exceeds thresholds for Zn and Cu to obtain European biochar certification; however, has potential to be classified as a pyrogenic carbonaceous material (PCM), which resembles a high nutrient biochar.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal waste</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auto-thermal gasification</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Cold gas</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Floors and Floorcoverings</subject><subject>Gases - analysis</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry litter char</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>Thermal treatment</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtqFEEUQAtRzCT6ByK1dNPtrWd3b4QQogYCbgy4K-5U35IauqfHqmpldvkH_9AvscJEl7q6D859cBh7JaAVIOzbXfsD84z7VtaqBdmCsk_YRvTd0Eht7FO2gcHYBoz6csbOc94BCN0LeM7OpB1q1sGGXd8dxoSh8K-YY4geS1z2fAn8sKxTSUc-xVIocSw8YJqb7HEi_uv-J7_kHjPxXNbx-II9CzhlevkYL9jd--vPVx-b208fbq4ubxtvwJYGTTBKD7SFoDRJNYIVurZ6r0xnZa_QD2YIKkDnu_rhdouKUEhPqI0AUBfszWnvIS3fVsrFzTF7mibc07JmJ7reSA1QV_0f7axVoLWtqD6hPi05JwrukOKM6egEuAfXbudOrt2DawfSVdd17PXjhXU70_h36I_cCrw7AVSVfI-UXPaR9p7GmMgXNy7x3xd-A1swkRE</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Taupe, N.C.</creator><creator>Lynch, D.</creator><creator>Wnetrzak, R.</creator><creator>Kwapinska, M.</creator><creator>Kwapinski, W.</creator><creator>Leahy, J.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study</title><author>Taupe, N.C. ; Lynch, D. ; Wnetrzak, R. ; Kwapinska, M. ; Kwapinski, W. ; Leahy, J.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal waste</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auto-thermal gasification</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Cold gas</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Floors and Floorcoverings</topic><topic>Gases - analysis</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry litter char</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>Thermal treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taupe, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wnetrzak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapinska, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwapinski, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leahy, J.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taupe, N.C.</au><au>Lynch, D.</au><au>Wnetrzak, R.</au><au>Kwapinska, M.</au><au>Kwapinski, W.</au><au>Leahy, J.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><spage>324</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>324-333</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•A critical evaluation of an on-farm, auto-thermal gasification unit is proposed.•The low ash melting behaviour of the feedstock demanded low temperature operation.•The cold gas efficiency was low (0.26) compared to wood fed gasification.•The tar/water emulsion had a pH of 9.6 and nitrogen content of 9.2wt.%db.•Zn and Cu exceeded the concentration limits for biochar certification.
Farm and animal wastes are increasingly being investigated for thermochemical conversion, such as gasification, due to the urgent necessity of finding new waste treatment options. We report on an investigation of the use of a farm-scale, auto-thermal gasification system for the production of a heating gas using poultry litter (PL) as a feedstock. The gasification process was robust and reliable. The PL’s ash melting temperature was 639°C, therefore the reactor temperature was kept around this value. As a result of the low reactor temperature the process performance parameters were low, with a cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 0.26 and a carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 0.44. The calorific value of the clean product gas was 3.39MJm−3N (LHV). The tar was collected as an emulsion containing 87wt.% water and the extracted organic compounds were identified. The residual char exceeds thresholds for Zn and Cu to obtain European biochar certification; however, has potential to be classified as a pyrogenic carbonaceous material (PCM), which resembles a high nutrient biochar.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26948170</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.036</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-04, Vol.50, p.324-333 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785240028 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Animal Husbandry Animal waste Animals Auto-thermal gasification Carbon Chickens Cold gas Combustion Conversion Energy recovery Farms Floors and Floorcoverings Gases - analysis Gasification Hot Temperature Litter Poultry Poultry litter char Reactors Refuse Disposal - methods Thermal treatment |
title | Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A59%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Updraft%20gasification%20of%20poultry%20litter%20at%20farm-scale%20%E2%80%93%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Taupe,%20N.C.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=324-333&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1785240028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-a5f5349eb0f34e23d0614f538c3576283ac959f3f07c7948bba3ea12cea451003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776630446&rft_id=info:pmid/26948170&rfr_iscdi=true |