Tracking mated pairs in a long-distance migratory songbird: migration schedules are not synchronized within pairs

• Published in: Animal behaviour 2016-04, Vol.114, p.63-68
• Main Authors: Stutchbury, Bridget J.M., Fraser, Kevin C., Silverio, Cassandra, Kramer, Patrick, Aeppli, Bob, Mickle, Nanette, Pearman, Myrna, Savage, Anne, Mejeur, James
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal communication; Behavioral biology; Bird migration; divorce; geolocator; Habitats; migration; pair migration; Progne subis subis; purple martin; Seasons; wintering grounds
• ISSN: 0003-3472; 1095-8282
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.016

In long-distance migrants, it has been hypothesized that re-pairing in spring is facilitated if, on the wintering grounds, formerly mated individuals maintain close proximity or occupy ecologically similar habitat, which then results in more synchronized spring migration schedules. For songbirds, pair members have long been thought to migrate independently, but only recently has it been possible to directly track start-to-finish migration to test this prediction. We used light-sensor geolocators to track paired versus nonpaired purple martins, Progne subis subis, that breed in North America and winter in South America. In 6 of 12 pairs, pair members departed on autumn migration within 4 days of each other, but pairs rarely occupied nearby stopover sites in Central America and were separated by an average of 560km upon arrival in Brazil. Formerly paired birds were not significantly more similar in autumn or spring migration timing, or winter roost location, compared with nonpaired birds tracked from the same colonies and years. Formerly mated pairs who were closer together in Brazil, or who occupied regions with similar amounts of forest cover, did not have more synchronized spring migration schedules. Only 1 of 12 pairs that were tracked remated after migration. Intense competition for nesting cavities combined with disparate spring migration schedules of former pairs probably contributes to the high divorce rate. •We examined whether purple martins synchronize spring migration to facilitate re-pairing.•We tracked formerly paired vs nonpaired purple martins during migration (North America–Brazil).•Mated pairs did not subsequently have similar migration timing or destination.•Formerly mated pairs were separated by an average of 560km upon arrival in Brazil.•Neither proximity nor habitat similarity affected spring synchronization of formerly mated pairs.