Loading…

General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications

Models of functional ecospace diversification within life-habit frameworks (functional-trait spaces) are increasingly used across community ecology, functional ecology, and paleoecology. In general, these models can be represented by four basic processes, three that have driven causes and one that o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleobiology 2016-05, Vol.42 (2), p.209-239
Main Author: Novack-Gottshall, Philip M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33
container_end_page 239
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 42
creator Novack-Gottshall, Philip M
description Models of functional ecospace diversification within life-habit frameworks (functional-trait spaces) are increasingly used across community ecology, functional ecology, and paleoecology. In general, these models can be represented by four basic processes, three that have driven causes and one that occurs through a passive process. The driven models include redundancy (caused by forms of functional canalization), partitioning (specialization), and expansion (divergent novelty), but they also share important dynamical similarities with the passive neutral model. In this second of two companion articles, Monte Carlo simulations of these models are used to illustrate their basic statistical dynamics across a range of data structures and implementations. Ecospace frameworks with greater numbers of characters (functional traits) and ordered (multistate) character types provide more distinct dynamics and greater ability to distinguish the models, but the general dynamics tend to be congruent across all implementations. Classification-tree methods are proposed as a powerful means to select among multiple candidate models when using multivariate data sets. Well-preserved Late Ordovician (type Cincinnatian) samples from the Kope and Waynesville formations are used to illustrate how these models can be inferred in empirical applications. Initial simulations overestimate the ecological disparity of actual assemblages, confirming that actual life habits are highly constrained. Modifications incorporating more realistic assumptions (such as weighting potential life habits according to actual frequencies and adding a parameter controlling the strength of each model’s rules) provide better correspondence to actual assemblages. Samples from both formations are best fit by partitioning (and to lesser extent redundancy) models, consistent with a role for local processes. When aggregated as an entire formation, the Kope Formation pool remains best fit by the partitioning model, whereas the entire Waynesville pool is better fit by the redundancy model, implying greater beta diversity within this unit. The ‘ecospace’ package is provided to implement the simulations and to calculate their dynamics using the R statistical language.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/pab.2016.4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785248571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_pab_2016_4</cupid><jstor_id>48573893</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48573893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFr2zAUxkVpYWnay-4Dwy6lqz3JkmXpWEKbBQo9bIPejCQ_BwXZcqVko__95CRspYyeHt_Tj_d9-hD6SHBBMKm_jkoXJSa8YCdoRiQVeUUpOUUzjCXLBa3pB3Qe4wYnXfF6hp6WMEBQLut9Cy5mvsvAeOfX1qRla39BiLZLYmv9UGSrVZF9t_3O7XXM1NBm0I827HE1ju6Ixgt01ikX4fI45-jn_d2Pxbf84XG5Wtw-5Ioxus2BEik0EUpIyXRFGW8FK1WpeScAFG21URU1nDDNpeBtRUopNTUMKyU5UDpHV4e7Y_DPO4jbprfRgHNqAL-LDalFVTJR1SShn9-gG78LQ0o3UZjxGlc8UdcHygQfY4CuGYPtVXhpCG6mkptUcjOV3LAEfzrAm7j14S85-VEhp3RfDu9r8NFYGAz89sG1_5z3h3DNayYTfXO0Vr0Otl3Dq4T_Mz9-XVvvB3gv5x9xSKMi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780467056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</creator><creatorcontrib>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</creatorcontrib><description>Models of functional ecospace diversification within life-habit frameworks (functional-trait spaces) are increasingly used across community ecology, functional ecology, and paleoecology. In general, these models can be represented by four basic processes, three that have driven causes and one that occurs through a passive process. The driven models include redundancy (caused by forms of functional canalization), partitioning (specialization), and expansion (divergent novelty), but they also share important dynamical similarities with the passive neutral model. In this second of two companion articles, Monte Carlo simulations of these models are used to illustrate their basic statistical dynamics across a range of data structures and implementations. Ecospace frameworks with greater numbers of characters (functional traits) and ordered (multistate) character types provide more distinct dynamics and greater ability to distinguish the models, but the general dynamics tend to be congruent across all implementations. Classification-tree methods are proposed as a powerful means to select among multiple candidate models when using multivariate data sets. Well-preserved Late Ordovician (type Cincinnatian) samples from the Kope and Waynesville formations are used to illustrate how these models can be inferred in empirical applications. Initial simulations overestimate the ecological disparity of actual assemblages, confirming that actual life habits are highly constrained. Modifications incorporating more realistic assumptions (such as weighting potential life habits according to actual frequencies and adding a parameter controlling the strength of each model’s rules) provide better correspondence to actual assemblages. Samples from both formations are best fit by partitioning (and to lesser extent redundancy) models, consistent with a role for local processes. When aggregated as an entire formation, the Kope Formation pool remains best fit by the partitioning model, whereas the entire Waynesville pool is better fit by the redundancy model, implying greater beta diversity within this unit. The ‘ecospace’ package is provided to implement the simulations and to calculate their dynamics using the R statistical language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/pab.2016.4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PALBBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Paleontological Society</publisher><subject>adaptation ; algorithms ; Biodiversity ; biologic evolution ; Cincinnatian ; Community ecology ; Ecology ; functional morphology ; Indiana ; Kentucky ; Kope Formation ; Monte Carlo analysis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; morphology ; northern Kentucky ; Ohio ; Ordovician ; Paleobiology ; Paleoecology ; Paleontology ; Paleozoic ; sensitivity analysis ; southeastern Indiana ; southwestern Ohio ; statistical analysis ; theoretical models ; United States ; Upper Ordovician ; Waynesville Formation</subject><ispartof>Paleobiology, 2016-05, Vol.42 (2), p.209-239</ispartof><rights>2016 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved</rights><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Abstract, Copyright, The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>2016 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48573893$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S009483731600004X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</creatorcontrib><title>General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications</title><title>Paleobiology</title><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><description>Models of functional ecospace diversification within life-habit frameworks (functional-trait spaces) are increasingly used across community ecology, functional ecology, and paleoecology. In general, these models can be represented by four basic processes, three that have driven causes and one that occurs through a passive process. The driven models include redundancy (caused by forms of functional canalization), partitioning (specialization), and expansion (divergent novelty), but they also share important dynamical similarities with the passive neutral model. In this second of two companion articles, Monte Carlo simulations of these models are used to illustrate their basic statistical dynamics across a range of data structures and implementations. Ecospace frameworks with greater numbers of characters (functional traits) and ordered (multistate) character types provide more distinct dynamics and greater ability to distinguish the models, but the general dynamics tend to be congruent across all implementations. Classification-tree methods are proposed as a powerful means to select among multiple candidate models when using multivariate data sets. Well-preserved Late Ordovician (type Cincinnatian) samples from the Kope and Waynesville formations are used to illustrate how these models can be inferred in empirical applications. Initial simulations overestimate the ecological disparity of actual assemblages, confirming that actual life habits are highly constrained. Modifications incorporating more realistic assumptions (such as weighting potential life habits according to actual frequencies and adding a parameter controlling the strength of each model’s rules) provide better correspondence to actual assemblages. Samples from both formations are best fit by partitioning (and to lesser extent redundancy) models, consistent with a role for local processes. When aggregated as an entire formation, the Kope Formation pool remains best fit by the partitioning model, whereas the entire Waynesville pool is better fit by the redundancy model, implying greater beta diversity within this unit. The ‘ecospace’ package is provided to implement the simulations and to calculate their dynamics using the R statistical language.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biologic evolution</subject><subject>Cincinnatian</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>functional morphology</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Kentucky</subject><subject>Kope Formation</subject><subject>Monte Carlo analysis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>northern Kentucky</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Ordovician</subject><subject>Paleobiology</subject><subject>Paleoecology</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Paleozoic</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>southeastern Indiana</subject><subject>southwestern Ohio</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>theoretical models</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Upper Ordovician</subject><subject>Waynesville Formation</subject><issn>0094-8373</issn><issn>1938-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFr2zAUxkVpYWnay-4Dwy6lqz3JkmXpWEKbBQo9bIPejCQ_BwXZcqVko__95CRspYyeHt_Tj_d9-hD6SHBBMKm_jkoXJSa8YCdoRiQVeUUpOUUzjCXLBa3pB3Qe4wYnXfF6hp6WMEBQLut9Cy5mvsvAeOfX1qRla39BiLZLYmv9UGSrVZF9t_3O7XXM1NBm0I827HE1ju6Ixgt01ikX4fI45-jn_d2Pxbf84XG5Wtw-5Ioxus2BEik0EUpIyXRFGW8FK1WpeScAFG21URU1nDDNpeBtRUopNTUMKyU5UDpHV4e7Y_DPO4jbprfRgHNqAL-LDalFVTJR1SShn9-gG78LQ0o3UZjxGlc8UdcHygQfY4CuGYPtVXhpCG6mkptUcjOV3LAEfzrAm7j14S85-VEhp3RfDu9r8NFYGAz89sG1_5z3h3DNayYTfXO0Vr0Otl3Dq4T_Mz9-XVvvB3gv5x9xSKMi</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</creator><general>The Paleontological Society</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications</title><author>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biologic evolution</topic><topic>Cincinnatian</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>functional morphology</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Kentucky</topic><topic>Kope Formation</topic><topic>Monte Carlo analysis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>northern Kentucky</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Ordovician</topic><topic>Paleobiology</topic><topic>Paleoecology</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Paleozoic</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>southeastern Indiana</topic><topic>southwestern Ohio</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>theoretical models</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Upper Ordovician</topic><topic>Waynesville Formation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novack-Gottshall, Philip M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications</atitle><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>209-239</pages><issn>0094-8373</issn><eissn>1938-5331</eissn><coden>PALBBM</coden><abstract>Models of functional ecospace diversification within life-habit frameworks (functional-trait spaces) are increasingly used across community ecology, functional ecology, and paleoecology. In general, these models can be represented by four basic processes, three that have driven causes and one that occurs through a passive process. The driven models include redundancy (caused by forms of functional canalization), partitioning (specialization), and expansion (divergent novelty), but they also share important dynamical similarities with the passive neutral model. In this second of two companion articles, Monte Carlo simulations of these models are used to illustrate their basic statistical dynamics across a range of data structures and implementations. Ecospace frameworks with greater numbers of characters (functional traits) and ordered (multistate) character types provide more distinct dynamics and greater ability to distinguish the models, but the general dynamics tend to be congruent across all implementations. Classification-tree methods are proposed as a powerful means to select among multiple candidate models when using multivariate data sets. Well-preserved Late Ordovician (type Cincinnatian) samples from the Kope and Waynesville formations are used to illustrate how these models can be inferred in empirical applications. Initial simulations overestimate the ecological disparity of actual assemblages, confirming that actual life habits are highly constrained. Modifications incorporating more realistic assumptions (such as weighting potential life habits according to actual frequencies and adding a parameter controlling the strength of each model’s rules) provide better correspondence to actual assemblages. Samples from both formations are best fit by partitioning (and to lesser extent redundancy) models, consistent with a role for local processes. When aggregated as an entire formation, the Kope Formation pool remains best fit by the partitioning model, whereas the entire Waynesville pool is better fit by the redundancy model, implying greater beta diversity within this unit. The ‘ecospace’ package is provided to implement the simulations and to calculate their dynamics using the R statistical language.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Paleontological Society</pub><doi>10.1017/pab.2016.4</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8373
ispartof Paleobiology, 2016-05, Vol.42 (2), p.209-239
issn 0094-8373
1938-5331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785248571
source Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects adaptation
algorithms
Biodiversity
biologic evolution
Cincinnatian
Community ecology
Ecology
functional morphology
Indiana
Kentucky
Kope Formation
Monte Carlo analysis
Monte Carlo simulation
morphology
northern Kentucky
Ohio
Ordovician
Paleobiology
Paleoecology
Paleontology
Paleozoic
sensitivity analysis
southeastern Indiana
southwestern Ohio
statistical analysis
theoretical models
United States
Upper Ordovician
Waynesville Formation
title General models of ecological diversification. II. Simulations and empirical applications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A29%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=General%20models%20of%20ecological%20diversification.%20II.%20Simulations%20and%20empirical%20applications&rft.jtitle=Paleobiology&rft.au=Novack-Gottshall,%20Philip%20M&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=209-239&rft.issn=0094-8373&rft.eissn=1938-5331&rft.coden=PALBBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/pab.2016.4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48573893%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-e3198b18a8994b5346d842a2b6f8eea3dbca53c614b6986d51299b3c40aa96e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780467056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_pab_2016_4&rft_jstor_id=48573893&rfr_iscdi=true