Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects

Purpose: To assess agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation and disposable Luneau SA applanation prisms in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects. Methods: In a prospective comparative study, one eye per primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patient was measur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current eye research 2016-04, Vol.41 (4), p.521-525
Main Author: Eldaly, Mohamed A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Disposable
Disposable Equipment
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
glaucoma
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Goldmann
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Male
Middle Aged
normal subjects
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543
container_end_page 525
container_issue 4
container_start_page 521
container_title Current eye research
container_volume 41
creator Eldaly, Mohamed A.
description Purpose: To assess agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation and disposable Luneau SA applanation prisms in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects. Methods: In a prospective comparative study, one eye per primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patient was measured for IOP using Goldmann and disposable Luneau SA (Tonojet) applanation tonometry prisms. Glaucoma patients found with IOP < 21 mmHg were compared to an age-matched group of normal subjects. The main outcomes measured were IOP and the difference in IOP between either prism. Bland-Altman plots were used to study the agreement between measurements. Regression analysis was applied to either group. Results: One hundred and four POAG patients (eyes) were enrolled into this study. Seventy-one of them were found with IOPs < 21 mmHg, and were compared to 71 normal subjects (eyes). The mean difference between either prism was almost similar, 2.0 ± 2.0 and 2.1 ± 1.7 mmHg in the glaucoma and normal eye groups, respectively. Bias of two SD from the mean ranged from −1.8 to 5.8 mmHg in glaucoma group and −1.2 to 5.4 mmHg with normal subjects (p 
doi_str_mv 10.3109/02713683.2015.1015144
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785741039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785741039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78BCVHL13z2TY3xY9VEBVcr4Y0SaFLmtSkVfbf27K7Hr3MwPC8M8MDwDlGc4qRuEKkwDQv6ZwgzOd4LJixPTDDLEcZIYjsg9nEZBN0BI5TWiE0DdghOCK8pExQMQOfi-BMq7yH3zamIcG7JnUhqcpZeNN1TnnVN8HDZfChtb2NcNl0CTYeLpwadGgVfBsJ6_sElTfwJcRWOfg-VCur-3QKDmrlkj3b9hPw8XC_vH3Mnl8XT7c3z5mmed5nuUaaE4MpwabgrMxFXlemJIUmRnOmTWULWxIiSpNzg6wWXAiFjKUUYcwZPQGXm71dDF-DTb1sm6StG_-3YUgSFyUvGEZUjCjfoDqGlKKtZRebVsW1xEhOauVOrZzUyq3aMXexPTFUrTV_qZ3LEbjeAI2vJws_IToje7V2IdZRed2kaf9_N34BQx-ILA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785741039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To assess agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation and disposable Luneau SA applanation prisms in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects. Methods: In a prospective comparative study, one eye per primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patient was measured for IOP using Goldmann and disposable Luneau SA (Tonojet) applanation tonometry prisms. Glaucoma patients found with IOP &lt; 21 mmHg were compared to an age-matched group of normal subjects. The main outcomes measured were IOP and the difference in IOP between either prism. Bland-Altman plots were used to study the agreement between measurements. Regression analysis was applied to either group. Results: One hundred and four POAG patients (eyes) were enrolled into this study. Seventy-one of them were found with IOPs &lt; 21 mmHg, and were compared to 71 normal subjects (eyes). The mean difference between either prism was almost similar, 2.0 ± 2.0 and 2.1 ± 1.7 mmHg in the glaucoma and normal eye groups, respectively. Bias of two SD from the mean ranged from −1.8 to 5.8 mmHg in glaucoma group and −1.2 to 5.4 mmHg with normal subjects (p &lt; 0.0001 in either group). The inaccuracy was non-systematic with glaucoma patients while was systematic with normal subjects. Conclusions: The disagreement between disposables and standard Goldmann tips followed different patterns in glaucoma patients when compared with normal subjects. The use of the Goldmann tip is advised with glaucoma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-3683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1015144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25834939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Disposable ; Disposable Equipment ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology ; Goldmann ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Middle Aged ; normal subjects ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Current eye research, 2016-04, Vol.41 (4), p.521-525</ispartof><rights>2016 Taylor &amp; Francis, LLC 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><title>Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects</title><title>Current eye research</title><addtitle>Curr Eye Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: To assess agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation and disposable Luneau SA applanation prisms in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects. Methods: In a prospective comparative study, one eye per primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patient was measured for IOP using Goldmann and disposable Luneau SA (Tonojet) applanation tonometry prisms. Glaucoma patients found with IOP &lt; 21 mmHg were compared to an age-matched group of normal subjects. The main outcomes measured were IOP and the difference in IOP between either prism. Bland-Altman plots were used to study the agreement between measurements. Regression analysis was applied to either group. Results: One hundred and four POAG patients (eyes) were enrolled into this study. Seventy-one of them were found with IOPs &lt; 21 mmHg, and were compared to 71 normal subjects (eyes). The mean difference between either prism was almost similar, 2.0 ± 2.0 and 2.1 ± 1.7 mmHg in the glaucoma and normal eye groups, respectively. Bias of two SD from the mean ranged from −1.8 to 5.8 mmHg in glaucoma group and −1.2 to 5.4 mmHg with normal subjects (p &lt; 0.0001 in either group). The inaccuracy was non-systematic with glaucoma patients while was systematic with normal subjects. Conclusions: The disagreement between disposables and standard Goldmann tips followed different patterns in glaucoma patients when compared with normal subjects. The use of the Goldmann tip is advised with glaucoma patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Disposable</subject><subject>Disposable Equipment</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Goldmann</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>normal subjects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><issn>0271-3683</issn><issn>1460-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78BCVHL13z2TY3xY9VEBVcr4Y0SaFLmtSkVfbf27K7Hr3MwPC8M8MDwDlGc4qRuEKkwDQv6ZwgzOd4LJixPTDDLEcZIYjsg9nEZBN0BI5TWiE0DdghOCK8pExQMQOfi-BMq7yH3zamIcG7JnUhqcpZeNN1TnnVN8HDZfChtb2NcNl0CTYeLpwadGgVfBsJ6_sElTfwJcRWOfg-VCur-3QKDmrlkj3b9hPw8XC_vH3Mnl8XT7c3z5mmed5nuUaaE4MpwabgrMxFXlemJIUmRnOmTWULWxIiSpNzg6wWXAiFjKUUYcwZPQGXm71dDF-DTb1sm6StG_-3YUgSFyUvGEZUjCjfoDqGlKKtZRebVsW1xEhOauVOrZzUyq3aMXexPTFUrTV_qZ3LEbjeAI2vJws_IToje7V2IdZRed2kaf9_N34BQx-ILA</recordid><startdate>20160402</startdate><enddate>20160402</enddate><creator>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160402</creationdate><title>Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects</title><author>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Disposable</topic><topic>Disposable Equipment</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Goldmann</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>normal subjects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current eye research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eldaly, Mohamed A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects</atitle><jtitle>Current eye research</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Eye Res</addtitle><date>2016-04-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>521-525</pages><issn>0271-3683</issn><eissn>1460-2202</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To assess agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation and disposable Luneau SA applanation prisms in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects. Methods: In a prospective comparative study, one eye per primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patient was measured for IOP using Goldmann and disposable Luneau SA (Tonojet) applanation tonometry prisms. Glaucoma patients found with IOP &lt; 21 mmHg were compared to an age-matched group of normal subjects. The main outcomes measured were IOP and the difference in IOP between either prism. Bland-Altman plots were used to study the agreement between measurements. Regression analysis was applied to either group. Results: One hundred and four POAG patients (eyes) were enrolled into this study. Seventy-one of them were found with IOPs &lt; 21 mmHg, and were compared to 71 normal subjects (eyes). The mean difference between either prism was almost similar, 2.0 ± 2.0 and 2.1 ± 1.7 mmHg in the glaucoma and normal eye groups, respectively. Bias of two SD from the mean ranged from −1.8 to 5.8 mmHg in glaucoma group and −1.2 to 5.4 mmHg with normal subjects (p &lt; 0.0001 in either group). The inaccuracy was non-systematic with glaucoma patients while was systematic with normal subjects. Conclusions: The disagreement between disposables and standard Goldmann tips followed different patterns in glaucoma patients when compared with normal subjects. The use of the Goldmann tip is advised with glaucoma patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>25834939</pmid><doi>10.3109/02713683.2015.1015144</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-3683
ispartof Current eye research, 2016-04, Vol.41 (4), p.521-525
issn 0271-3683
1460-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785741039
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Aged
Disposable
Disposable Equipment
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
glaucoma
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Goldmann
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Male
Middle Aged
normal subjects
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation
title Goldmann versus Disposable Applanation Tonometer Tips in Glaucoma Patients and Normal Subjects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A41%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goldmann%20versus%20Disposable%20Applanation%20Tonometer%20Tips%20in%20Glaucoma%20Patients%20and%20Normal%20Subjects&rft.jtitle=Current%20eye%20research&rft.au=Eldaly,%20Mohamed%20A.&rft.date=2016-04-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=521-525&rft.issn=0271-3683&rft.eissn=1460-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/02713683.2015.1015144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1785741039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-6c0c52d1321d7548696fbd827c2dc54cdbe7e82298d65d0ec9599a0de33011543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785741039&rft_id=info:pmid/25834939&rfr_iscdi=true