Loading…
Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up
Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were mad...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 58 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Aguilar Ezquerra, A Panisello Sebastiá, J J Mateo Agudo, J |
description | Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies.
Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years.
Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling.
Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785749719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785749719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFKxDAQhoMg7rr6BILk6KU1aZs09baKroUFL3svaTrRLG1Sk1TZV_CprewKA3OYbz7-GYRuKEkpofx-n3pQLqYZoSwlcxFxhpa0EiIRgvEFugxhTwgvaEUv0CLjORWClEv0U1vdT2AVYKfx6MGN4GU0X4BbZwEPMgTcgQ0mHrCxeJ6a0bsQPyAadWQ8DK6D3th3LHUEj80w9tLGWePsn3b9uEnqGp_2ggkPeI0pSQ4gPdau7913Mo1X6FzLPsD1qa_Q7uV59_SabN829dN6m4yMlwlXOstkLuZLRFuRsuLAOIgiY5XsIOukVEVLlW5Zy_KcaRAd6RgUShKZK0bzFbo7auc4nxOE2AwmKOjnxOCm0NBSsLKoSlrN6O0JndoBumb0ZpD-0Py_L_8FuFpz3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785749719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies.
Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years.
Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling.
Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1988-8856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26318807</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling - physiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Joint - physiology ; Hip Joint - surgery ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Period ; Preoperative Period ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 SECOT. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><title>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies.
Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years.
Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling.
Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Preoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1988-8856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMFKxDAQhoMg7rr6BILk6KU1aZs09baKroUFL3svaTrRLG1Sk1TZV_CprewKA3OYbz7-GYRuKEkpofx-n3pQLqYZoSwlcxFxhpa0EiIRgvEFugxhTwgvaEUv0CLjORWClEv0U1vdT2AVYKfx6MGN4GU0X4BbZwEPMgTcgQ0mHrCxeJ6a0bsQPyAadWQ8DK6D3th3LHUEj80w9tLGWePsn3b9uEnqGp_2ggkPeI0pSQ4gPdau7913Mo1X6FzLPsD1qa_Q7uV59_SabN829dN6m4yMlwlXOstkLuZLRFuRsuLAOIgiY5XsIOukVEVLlW5Zy_KcaRAd6RgUShKZK0bzFbo7auc4nxOE2AwmKOjnxOCm0NBSsLKoSlrN6O0JndoBumb0ZpD-0Py_L_8FuFpz3Q</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creator><creator>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creator><creator>Mateo Agudo, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><author>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Preoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</au><au>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</au><au>Mateo Agudo, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>53-58</pages><eissn>1988-8856</eissn><abstract>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies.
Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years.
Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling.
Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>26318807</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1988-8856 |
ispartof | Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58 |
issn | 1988-8856 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785749719 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation Bone Density Bone Remodeling - physiology Female Follow-Up Studies Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging Hip Joint - physiology Hip Joint - surgery Hip Prosthesis Humans Male Middle Aged Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Postoperative Period Preoperative Period Prospective Studies |
title | Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20preoperative%20bone%20mass%20density%20in%20periprosthetic%20bone%20remodeling%20after%20implantation%20of%20ABG-II%20prosthesis:%20A%2010-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20cirug%C3%ADa%20ortop%C3%A9dica%20y%20traumatolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Aguilar%20Ezquerra,%20A&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=53-58&rft.eissn=1988-8856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785749719%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785749719&rft_id=info:pmid/26318807&rfr_iscdi=true |