Loading…

Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up

Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were mad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58
Main Authors: Aguilar Ezquerra, A, Panisello Sebastiá, J J, Mateo Agudo, J
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología
container_volume 60
creator Aguilar Ezquerra, A
Panisello Sebastiá, J J
Mateo Agudo, J
description Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years. Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling. Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785749719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785749719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFKxDAQhoMg7rr6BILk6KU1aZs09baKroUFL3svaTrRLG1Sk1TZV_CprewKA3OYbz7-GYRuKEkpofx-n3pQLqYZoSwlcxFxhpa0EiIRgvEFugxhTwgvaEUv0CLjORWClEv0U1vdT2AVYKfx6MGN4GU0X4BbZwEPMgTcgQ0mHrCxeJ6a0bsQPyAadWQ8DK6D3th3LHUEj80w9tLGWePsn3b9uEnqGp_2ggkPeI0pSQ4gPdau7913Mo1X6FzLPsD1qa_Q7uV59_SabN829dN6m4yMlwlXOstkLuZLRFuRsuLAOIgiY5XsIOukVEVLlW5Zy_KcaRAd6RgUShKZK0bzFbo7auc4nxOE2AwmKOjnxOCm0NBSsLKoSlrN6O0JndoBumb0ZpD-0Py_L_8FuFpz3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785749719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years. Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling. Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1988-8856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26318807</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling - physiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Joint - physiology ; Hip Joint - surgery ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Period ; Preoperative Period ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 SECOT. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><title>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years. Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling. Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Preoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1988-8856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMFKxDAQhoMg7rr6BILk6KU1aZs09baKroUFL3svaTrRLG1Sk1TZV_CprewKA3OYbz7-GYRuKEkpofx-n3pQLqYZoSwlcxFxhpa0EiIRgvEFugxhTwgvaEUv0CLjORWClEv0U1vdT2AVYKfx6MGN4GU0X4BbZwEPMgTcgQ0mHrCxeJ6a0bsQPyAadWQ8DK6D3th3LHUEj80w9tLGWePsn3b9uEnqGp_2ggkPeI0pSQ4gPdau7913Mo1X6FzLPsD1qa_Q7uV59_SabN829dN6m4yMlwlXOstkLuZLRFuRsuLAOIgiY5XsIOukVEVLlW5Zy_KcaRAd6RgUShKZK0bzFbo7auc4nxOE2AwmKOjnxOCm0NBSsLKoSlrN6O0JndoBumb0ZpD-0Py_L_8FuFpz3Q</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creator><creator>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creator><creator>Mateo Agudo, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</title><author>Aguilar Ezquerra, A ; Panisello Sebastiá, J J ; Mateo Agudo, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Preoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo Agudo, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguilar Ezquerra, A</au><au>Panisello Sebastiá, J J</au><au>Mateo Agudo, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>53-58</pages><eissn>1988-8856</eissn><abstract>Preoperative bone mass index has shown to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic bone remodelling in short follow-up studies. Bone density scans (DXA) were used to perform a 10-year follow-up study of 39 patients with a unilateral, uncemented hip replacement. Bone mass index measurements were made at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery. Pearson coefficient was used to quantify correlations between preoperative bone mass density (BMD) and peri-prosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at 6 months, one year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years. Pre-operative BMD was a good predictor of peri-prosthetic BMD one year after surgery in zones 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 (Pearson index from 0.61 to 0.75). Three years after surgery it has good predictive power in zones 1, 4 and 5 (0.71-0.61), although in zones 3 and 7 low correlation was observed one year after surgery (0.51 and 0.57, respectively). At the end of the follow-up low correlation was observed in the 7 Gruen zones. Sex and BMI were found to not have a statistically significant influence on peri-prosthetic bone remodelling. Although preoperative BMD seems to be an important factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling one year after hip replacement, it loses its predictive power progressively, until not being a major factor in peri-prosthetic remodelling ten years after surgery.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>26318807</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1988-8856
ispartof Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.53-58
issn 1988-8856
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785749719
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation
Bone Density
Bone Remodeling - physiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging
Hip Joint - physiology
Hip Joint - surgery
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Postoperative Period
Preoperative Period
Prospective Studies
title Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20preoperative%20bone%20mass%20density%20in%20periprosthetic%20bone%20remodeling%20after%20implantation%20of%20ABG-II%20prosthesis:%20A%2010-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20cirug%C3%ADa%20ortop%C3%A9dica%20y%20traumatolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Aguilar%20Ezquerra,%20A&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=53-58&rft.eissn=1988-8856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785749719%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-6cf22a384198b90796e56e84259ade2daac4b1cfb5b5335fe8d0d5e4ca0a3c513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785749719&rft_id=info:pmid/26318807&rfr_iscdi=true