Assessment of radioactive wastes from a DCLL fusion reactor: Disposal in El Cabril facility

•Radwastes from a DCLL reactor have been assessed following IAEA classification.•Disposal in El Cabril facility has been studied.•9% of the total volume considered can be disposed in El Cabril.•Concrete-made biological shield can be managed through clearance.•Comparison with French regulation shows...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fusion engineering and design 2014-10, Vol.89 (9-10), p.2038-2042
Main Authors: García, Raquel, Catalán, Juan Pablo, Sanz, Javier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Blanketing
Channels
Clearance
Clearances
Cryostats
DCLL blanket
El Cabril
Fusion reactor
Mathematical analysis
Radioactive waste
Structural steels
Waste disposal
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Radwastes from a DCLL reactor have been assessed following IAEA classification.•Disposal in El Cabril facility has been studied.•9% of the total volume considered can be disposed in El Cabril.•Concrete-made biological shield can be managed through clearance.•Comparison with French regulation shows similar conclusions. Under the Spanish Breeding Blanket Technology Programme TECNO_FUS a conceptual design of a DCLL (Dual-Coolant Lithium–Lead) blanket-based reactor is being revised. The dually cooled breeding zone is composed of He/LiPb and SiC as material of the liquid metal flow channel inserts. Structural materials are ferritic-martensitic steel (Eurofer) for the blanket and austenitic steel (SS316LN) for the vacuum vessel (VV) and the cryostat. In this work, radioactive wastes are assessed in order to determine if they can be disposed as low and intermediate level radioactive waste (LILW) in the Spanish near surface disposal facility of El Cabril. Also, unconditional clearance and recycling waste management options are studied. The neutron transport calculations have been performed with MCNPX code, while the ACAB code is used for calculations of the inventory of activation products and for activation analysis, in terms of waste management ratings for the options considered. Results show that the total amount of the cryostat can be disposed in El Cabril joined to the outer layer of both VV and channel inserts, whereas only concrete-made biological shield can be managed through clearance and none of the steels can be recycled. Those results are compared with those corresponding to French regulation, showing similar conclusions.
ISSN:0920-3796
1873-7196
DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.04.024