HOME RANGE AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS OF COLUMBIAN SHARP-TAILED GROUSE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM AND MINE RECLAMATION

• Published in: Western North American naturalist 2005-01, Vol.65 (1), p.36-44
• Main Authors: Boisvert, Jennifer H., Hoffman, Richard W., Reese, Kerry P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breeding; Breeding seasons; Breeding sites; Female animals; Grouse; Habitat conservation; Male animals; Nesting sites; Seasons; Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus; Wildlife habitats
• ISSN: 1527-0904; 1944-8341

During 1999 and 2000 we trapped and radio-marked 156 Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus) on leks in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP, n = 73) and mine reclamation (MR, n = 83) lands in northwestern Colorado. Median spring-fall home range sizes using the 95% fixed kernal and minimum convex polygon estimators for 54 grouse were 86 ha and 61 ha, respectively. Median fixed kernal home range size did not differ between males (79 ha) and females (87 ha). Home ranges of grouse associated with CRP (112 ha) were larger than those of grouse in MR (75 ha). Directional orientation of movements from leks of capture to wintering areas was nonrandom, and there was a positive elevation gain (median = 102 m) associated with these movements. Movements did not differ between grouse captured in CRP and MR for any season but did differ between genders for the spring-fall period. Males exhibited stronger fidelity and less variation in their movements than females; 96% of males compared with only 77% of females remained within 2.0 km of their lek of capture from spring through fall. Ninety percent of females nested within 2.5 km of their lek of capture. During winter all grouse were found farther (median = 21.5 km) from lek sites than in any other season. Males remained on the breeding range longer in the fall and returned earlier in the spring than females even though they wintered similar distances away (median males = 21.5 km, median females = 21.4 km). Our findings support the 2.0-km radius used in the Habitat Suitability Index model for Columbian Sharptailed Grouse to assess nest and brood-rearing cover around leks, but not the 6.5-km radius used to evaluate winter cover.