Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis

• Published in: European Spine Journal 2016-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1522-1532
• Main Authors: Pan, Aixing, Hai, Yong, Yang, Jincai, Zhou, Lijin, Chen, Xiaolong, Guo, Hui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Humans; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - surgery; Length of Stay; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Range of Motion, Articular; Review Article; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spinal Fusion - statistics & numerical data; Surgical Orthopedics
• ISSN: 0940-6719; 1432-0932
• DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4415-6

Purpose This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of motion-preservation procedures to prevent the adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) or adjacent segment disease (ASDis) compared with fusion in lumbar spine. Methods PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched and a meta-analysis was performed of all randomized controlled trials and well designed prospective or retrospective comparative cohort studies assessing the lumbar fusion and motion-preservation procedures. We compared the ASDeg and ASDis rate, reoperation rate, operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement of the two procedures. Results A total of 15 studies consisting of 1474 patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of ASDeg, ASDis and reoperation rate on the adjacent level were lower in motion-preservation procedures group than in the fusion group ( P  = 0.001; P  = 0.0004; P