Selection never dominates drift (nor vice versa)

The probability that the fitter of two alleles will increase in frequency in a population goes up as the product of N (the effective population size) and s (the selection coefficient) increases. Discovering the distribution of values for this product across different alleles in different populations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology & philosophy 2013-07, Vol.28 (4), p.577-592
Main Authors: Clatterbuck, Hayley, Sober, Elliott, Lewontin, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Education
Evolutionary Biology
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The probability that the fitter of two alleles will increase in frequency in a population goes up as the product of N (the effective population size) and s (the selection coefficient) increases. Discovering the distribution of values for this product across different alleles in different populations is a very important biological task. However, biologists often use the product Ns to define a different concept; they say that drift “dominates” selection or that drift is “stronger than” selection when Ns is much smaller than some threshold quantity (e.g., ½) and that the reverse is true when Ns is much larger than that threshold. We argue that the question of whether drift dominates selection for a single allele in a single population makes no sense. Selection and drift are causes of evolution, but there is no fact of the matter as to which cause is stronger in the evolution of any given allele.
ISSN:0169-3867
1572-8404
DOI:10.1007/s10539-013-9374-2