Loading…

Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography

Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687
Main Authors: Xiao, W.-L, Zhang, D.-Z, Chen, X.-J, Yuan, C, Xue, L.-F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3
container_end_page 687
container_issue 6
container_start_page 683
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 45
creator Xiao, W.-L
Zhang, D.-Z
Chen, X.-J
Yuan, C
Xue, L.-F
description Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1788225531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0901502716000527</els_id><sourcerecordid>1788225531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzU3qKSLI4AsGZqGuQyq56UlZlbRJaqS3_nJT9OjChXAhF-75DuQcQp4D2wOD9tW0d1NY9rzsewZlxAOyAzEMFWOcPSQ7NjCoGsa7C_IkpYkxNoi-e0wueNt3LdT1jvy6SRnDAT0mlyhaizrTYOlhdQYNHYNHGnG7R5Vd8FSHZXS-nH66fEvVfIdhVpHqGW2mh6hsdv7wmqqUMKUFfabjqUDFZkS1bPhxzQXPYQlFfrw9PSWPrJoTPrt_L8m3D--_Xn2qrm8-fr56d13pGiBXukUztMxasPXY1aZmveg01-3Y1CN21gyiFr3WRpWV1bYV_aDHDgBaoUBZcUlenn2PMfxYMWW5uKRxnpXHsCYJXd9z3jQCipSfpTqGlCJaeYxuUfEkgckteznJLXu5ZS8ZlBEFenHvv44Lmr_In7CL4M1ZgOWXdw6jTNqh12hcLLFLE9z__d_-g-vZeafV_B1PmKawRl_ykyATl0x-2drfyoe2FN_wTvwG_uatXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788225531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26876144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar Bone Grafting ; Alveolar Process - abnormalities ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Regeneration ; bone resorption rate ; CBCT ; Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; guided bone regeneration ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods ; Humans ; Osteogenesis ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.-Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, X.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</description><subject>Alveolar Bone Grafting</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - abnormalities</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>bone resorption rate</subject><subject>CBCT</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>guided bone regeneration</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzU3qKSLI4AsGZqGuQyq56UlZlbRJaqS3_nJT9OjChXAhF-75DuQcQp4D2wOD9tW0d1NY9rzsewZlxAOyAzEMFWOcPSQ7NjCoGsa7C_IkpYkxNoi-e0wueNt3LdT1jvy6SRnDAT0mlyhaizrTYOlhdQYNHYNHGnG7R5Vd8FSHZXS-nH66fEvVfIdhVpHqGW2mh6hsdv7wmqqUMKUFfabjqUDFZkS1bPhxzQXPYQlFfrw9PSWPrJoTPrt_L8m3D--_Xn2qrm8-fr56d13pGiBXukUztMxasPXY1aZmveg01-3Y1CN21gyiFr3WRpWV1bYV_aDHDgBaoUBZcUlenn2PMfxYMWW5uKRxnpXHsCYJXd9z3jQCipSfpTqGlCJaeYxuUfEkgckteznJLXu5ZS8ZlBEFenHvv44Lmr_In7CL4M1ZgOWXdw6jTNqh12hcLLFLE9z__d_-g-vZeafV_B1PmKawRl_ykyATl0x-2drfyoe2FN_wTvwG_uatXw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Xiao, W.-L</creator><creator>Zhang, D.-Z</creator><creator>Chen, X.-J</creator><creator>Yuan, C</creator><creator>Xue, L.-F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><author>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Bone Grafting</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - abnormalities</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>bone resorption rate</topic><topic>CBCT</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>guided bone regeneration</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.-Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, X.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, W.-L</au><au>Zhang, D.-Z</au><au>Chen, X.-J</au><au>Yuan, C</au><au>Xue, L.-F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>687</epage><pages>683-687</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26876144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1788225531
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Alveolar Bone Grafting
Alveolar Process - abnormalities
Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging
Bone Regeneration
bone resorption rate
CBCT
Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging
Cleft Palate - surgery
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
guided bone regeneration
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods
Humans
Osteogenesis
Prospective Studies
Surgery
title Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A46%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteogenesis%20effect%20of%20guided%20bone%20regeneration%20combined%20with%20alveolar%20cleft%20grafting:%20assessment%20by%20cone%20beam%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Xiao,%20W.-L&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=687&rft.pages=683-687&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1788225531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788225531&rft_id=info:pmid/26876144&rfr_iscdi=true