Loading…
Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography
Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alon...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3 |
container_end_page | 687 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 683 |
container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Xiao, W.-L Zhang, D.-Z Chen, X.-J Yuan, C Xue, L.-F |
description | Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1788225531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0901502716000527</els_id><sourcerecordid>1788225531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzU3qKSLI4AsGZqGuQyq56UlZlbRJaqS3_nJT9OjChXAhF-75DuQcQp4D2wOD9tW0d1NY9rzsewZlxAOyAzEMFWOcPSQ7NjCoGsa7C_IkpYkxNoi-e0wueNt3LdT1jvy6SRnDAT0mlyhaizrTYOlhdQYNHYNHGnG7R5Vd8FSHZXS-nH66fEvVfIdhVpHqGW2mh6hsdv7wmqqUMKUFfabjqUDFZkS1bPhxzQXPYQlFfrw9PSWPrJoTPrt_L8m3D--_Xn2qrm8-fr56d13pGiBXukUztMxasPXY1aZmveg01-3Y1CN21gyiFr3WRpWV1bYV_aDHDgBaoUBZcUlenn2PMfxYMWW5uKRxnpXHsCYJXd9z3jQCipSfpTqGlCJaeYxuUfEkgckteznJLXu5ZS8ZlBEFenHvv44Lmr_In7CL4M1ZgOWXdw6jTNqh12hcLLFLE9z__d_-g-vZeafV_B1PmKawRl_ykyATl0x-2drfyoe2FN_wTvwG_uatXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788225531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26876144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar Bone Grafting ; Alveolar Process - abnormalities ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Regeneration ; bone resorption rate ; CBCT ; Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; guided bone regeneration ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods ; Humans ; Osteogenesis ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.-Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, X.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</description><subject>Alveolar Bone Grafting</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - abnormalities</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>bone resorption rate</subject><subject>CBCT</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>guided bone regeneration</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIlm6qzU3qKSLI4AsGZqGuQyq56UlZlbRJaqS3_nJT9OjChXAhF-75DuQcQp4D2wOD9tW0d1NY9rzsewZlxAOyAzEMFWOcPSQ7NjCoGsa7C_IkpYkxNoi-e0wueNt3LdT1jvy6SRnDAT0mlyhaizrTYOlhdQYNHYNHGnG7R5Vd8FSHZXS-nH66fEvVfIdhVpHqGW2mh6hsdv7wmqqUMKUFfabjqUDFZkS1bPhxzQXPYQlFfrw9PSWPrJoTPrt_L8m3D--_Xn2qrm8-fr56d13pGiBXukUztMxasPXY1aZmveg01-3Y1CN21gyiFr3WRpWV1bYV_aDHDgBaoUBZcUlenn2PMfxYMWW5uKRxnpXHsCYJXd9z3jQCipSfpTqGlCJaeYxuUfEkgckteznJLXu5ZS8ZlBEFenHvv44Lmr_In7CL4M1ZgOWXdw6jTNqh12hcLLFLE9z__d_-g-vZeafV_B1PmKawRl_ykyATl0x-2drfyoe2FN_wTvwG_uatXw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Xiao, W.-L</creator><creator>Zhang, D.-Z</creator><creator>Chen, X.-J</creator><creator>Yuan, C</creator><creator>Xue, L.-F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</title><author>Xiao, W.-L ; Zhang, D.-Z ; Chen, X.-J ; Yuan, C ; Xue, L.-F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Bone Grafting</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - abnormalities</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>bone resorption rate</topic><topic>CBCT</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>guided bone regeneration</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, W.-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D.-Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, X.-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, L.-F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, W.-L</au><au>Zhang, D.-Z</au><au>Chen, X.-J</au><au>Yuan, C</au><au>Xue, L.-F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>687</epage><pages>683-687</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Abstract Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows for a significantly lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography (CT) scans and provides accurate images of the alveolar cleft area. The osteogenic effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) vs. conventional alveolar bone grafting alone for alveolar cleft defects was evaluated in this study. Sixty alveolar cleft patients were divided randomly into two groups. One group underwent GBR using acellular dermal matrix film combined with alveolar bone grafting using iliac crest bone grafts (GBR group), while the other group underwent alveolar bone grafting only (non-GBR group). CBCT images were obtained at 1 week and at 3 months following the procedure. Using Simplant 11.04 software, the bone resorption rate was calculated and compared between the two groups. The bone resorption rate from 1 week to 3 months following bone grafting without the GBR technique was 36.50 ± 5.04%, whereas the bone resorption rate using the GBR technique was 31.69 ± 5.50% ( P = 0.017). The application of autogenous iliac bone combined with the GBR technique for alveolar bone grafting of alveolar cleft patients can reduce bone resorption and result in better osteogenesis.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26876144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2016-06, Vol.45 (6), p.683-687 |
issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1788225531 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Alveolar Bone Grafting Alveolar Process - abnormalities Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging Bone Regeneration bone resorption rate CBCT Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging Cleft Palate - surgery Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dentistry guided bone regeneration Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods Humans Osteogenesis Prospective Studies Surgery |
title | Osteogenesis effect of guided bone regeneration combined with alveolar cleft grafting: assessment by cone beam computed tomography |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A46%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteogenesis%20effect%20of%20guided%20bone%20regeneration%20combined%20with%20alveolar%20cleft%20grafting:%20assessment%20by%20cone%20beam%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Xiao,%20W.-L&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=687&rft.pages=683-687&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1788225531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c6ed960ff1f4b74d40837c2c6b54be7fd93438ccdafd904f6389cb711163a1af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788225531&rft_id=info:pmid/26876144&rfr_iscdi=true |