Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts

Highlights • We used Fixsen and colleagues' (2005) three levels of implementation to assess North Carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies. • Nearly half (48%) of counties in North Carolina were implementing an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. • All counties that were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexual & reproductive healthcare 2016-06, Vol.8, p.102-104
Main Authors: Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES, Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Community Health Services
Female
Health Plan Implementation - methods
Humans
Internal Medicine
North Carolina
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy in Adolescence - prevention & control
Pregnancy Rate
Program Evaluation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153
container_end_page 104
container_issue
container_start_page 102
container_title Sexual & reproductive healthcare
container_volume 8
creator Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES
Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES
description Highlights • We used Fixsen and colleagues' (2005) three levels of implementation to assess North Carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies. • Nearly half (48%) of counties in North Carolina were implementing an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. • All counties that were implementing adolescent pregnancy prevention programs were receiving funding. • These counties were also more likely to implement core and organizational strategies, in comparison to external strategies. • The counties implementing external strategies (i.e., adolescent friendly clinics/services) significantly reduced their adolescent pregnancy rates (β = -0.412, p = .003).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.02.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789497367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1877575616000215</els_id><sourcerecordid>1789497367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1O3DAUhS3UikHAC7BA3rWbCf6J7WRTaYRoi4TEgrK2HOcGMpOxg28GNG9fRwPjja-sc458v0PIFWcFZ1zfrAtMr74QeS6YKBiTJ-SMV8YsldHlt-Os9IJcIq5ZPpKXla5PyUIYbmpZ6TMCq3Ec9n14oS7QPkyQ3iFMfQy0S24LHzFt6BSpQwREGmKaXql3KQ59cD-QujYOgD5b6JjgJbjg9_P0FQJdly14Qb53bkC4_LzPyfPvu3-3f5cPj3_ub1cPS18yMS1bp0rfCtFpUUol69aJUjEQ-b0WXdeUXislna6l80I2Rqi2ERqkaTRUwJU8Jz8PuWOKbzvAyW77_LthcAHiDi03VV3WRmqTpeIg9SkiJujsmPqtS3vLmZ0J27WdCduZsGXCZnzZdP2Zv2u20B4tXzyz4NdBAHnL9x6S9ZlU792wgT3gOu5SyAAst5gT7dNc0twR17kekTf4D_cxjwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789497367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES ; Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</creator><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES ; Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We used Fixsen and colleagues' (2005) three levels of implementation to assess North Carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies. • Nearly half (48%) of counties in North Carolina were implementing an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. • All counties that were implementing adolescent pregnancy prevention programs were receiving funding. • These counties were also more likely to implement core and organizational strategies, in comparison to external strategies. • The counties implementing external strategies (i.e., adolescent friendly clinics/services) significantly reduced their adolescent pregnancy rates (β = -0.412, p = .003).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-5756</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-5764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.02.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27179386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Community Health Services ; Female ; Health Plan Implementation - methods ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; North Carolina ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy in Adolescence - prevention &amp; control ; Pregnancy Rate ; Program Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare, 2016-06, Vol.8, p.102-104</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7558-9580</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27179386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</creatorcontrib><title>Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts</title><title>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</title><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><description>Highlights • We used Fixsen and colleagues' (2005) three levels of implementation to assess North Carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies. • Nearly half (48%) of counties in North Carolina were implementing an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. • All counties that were implementing adolescent pregnancy prevention programs were receiving funding. • These counties were also more likely to implement core and organizational strategies, in comparison to external strategies. • The counties implementing external strategies (i.e., adolescent friendly clinics/services) significantly reduced their adolescent pregnancy rates (β = -0.412, p = .003).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Community Health Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy in Adolescence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><issn>1877-5756</issn><issn>1877-5764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kc1O3DAUhS3UikHAC7BA3rWbCf6J7WRTaYRoi4TEgrK2HOcGMpOxg28GNG9fRwPjja-sc458v0PIFWcFZ1zfrAtMr74QeS6YKBiTJ-SMV8YsldHlt-Os9IJcIq5ZPpKXla5PyUIYbmpZ6TMCq3Ec9n14oS7QPkyQ3iFMfQy0S24LHzFt6BSpQwREGmKaXql3KQ59cD-QujYOgD5b6JjgJbjg9_P0FQJdly14Qb53bkC4_LzPyfPvu3-3f5cPj3_ub1cPS18yMS1bp0rfCtFpUUol69aJUjEQ-b0WXdeUXislna6l80I2Rqi2ERqkaTRUwJU8Jz8PuWOKbzvAyW77_LthcAHiDi03VV3WRmqTpeIg9SkiJujsmPqtS3vLmZ0J27WdCduZsGXCZnzZdP2Zv2u20B4tXzyz4NdBAHnL9x6S9ZlU792wgT3gOu5SyAAst5gT7dNc0twR17kekTf4D_cxjwg</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES</creator><creator>Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-9580</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts</title><author>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES ; Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Community Health Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy in Adolescence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chambers, Brittany D., MPH, CHES</au><au>Ma, Alice, MPH, CHES</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts</atitle><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>102</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>102-104</pages><issn>1877-5756</issn><eissn>1877-5764</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We used Fixsen and colleagues' (2005) three levels of implementation to assess North Carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention strategies. • Nearly half (48%) of counties in North Carolina were implementing an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. • All counties that were implementing adolescent pregnancy prevention programs were receiving funding. • These counties were also more likely to implement core and organizational strategies, in comparison to external strategies. • The counties implementing external strategies (i.e., adolescent friendly clinics/services) significantly reduced their adolescent pregnancy rates (β = -0.412, p = .003).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>27179386</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.srhc.2016.02.003</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-9580</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-5756
ispartof Sexual & reproductive healthcare, 2016-06, Vol.8, p.102-104
issn 1877-5756
1877-5764
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789497367
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Community Health Services
Female
Health Plan Implementation - methods
Humans
Internal Medicine
North Carolina
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy in Adolescence - prevention & control
Pregnancy Rate
Program Evaluation
title Applying an intervention framework to assess north carolina's adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applying%20an%20intervention%20framework%20to%20assess%20north%20carolina's%20adolescent%20pregnancy%20prevention%20efforts&rft.jtitle=Sexual%20&%20reproductive%20healthcare&rft.au=Chambers,%20Brittany%20D.,%20MPH,%20CHES&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=102-104&rft.issn=1877-5756&rft.eissn=1877-5764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789497367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da54cd22f6243539da2450e2da592ffb4c6553a693ac23b725db26e37b6e8e153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789497367&rft_id=info:pmid/27179386&rfr_iscdi=true