Loading…

Understanding reactions to safety incentives

Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and grou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of safety research 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30
Main Authors: Haines, Victor Y, Merrheim, Grégoire, Roy, Mario
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Journal of safety research
container_volume 32
creator Haines, Victor Y
Merrheim, Grégoire
Roy, Mario
description Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant. Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives. Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment. Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17900821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022437500000517</els_id><sourcerecordid>17900821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QSguRMHRe5PJoyuR4gsKLrTrkGYyktJmapIW-u9NW3HhxtXdfOdw7kfIOcItAoq7dwBKq5pJfgVwDQAcK3lAeqjksEJay0PS-0WOyUlKswIJjtgjN5PQuJiyCY0Pn4PojM2-C2mQu0EyrcubgQ_WhezXLp2So9bMkzv7uX0yeXr8GL1U47fn19HDuLJM8Fwx5ALrmgEVnFo5BAdMNVNujWiNpcAkSqWANUxJ6awSDYfh1ICEwkgpWJ9c7nuXsftauZT1wifr5nMTXLdKGksnKIoFvPgDzrpVDGWbpqhqEMhlgfgesrFLKbpWL6NfmLjRCHorUO8E6q0dDaB3AvU2d7_PufLq2ruok_WuyGh8dDbrpvP_NHwDEmF02A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218406157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant. Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives. Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment. Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Effectiveness ; Health ; Incentives ; Safety ; safety incentives</subject><ispartof>Journal of safety research, 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Spring 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrheim, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><title>Journal of safety research</title><description>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant. Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives. Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment. Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety incentives</subject><issn>0022-4375</issn><issn>1879-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QSguRMHRe5PJoyuR4gsKLrTrkGYyktJmapIW-u9NW3HhxtXdfOdw7kfIOcItAoq7dwBKq5pJfgVwDQAcK3lAeqjksEJay0PS-0WOyUlKswIJjtgjN5PQuJiyCY0Pn4PojM2-C2mQu0EyrcubgQ_WhezXLp2So9bMkzv7uX0yeXr8GL1U47fn19HDuLJM8Fwx5ALrmgEVnFo5BAdMNVNujWiNpcAkSqWANUxJ6awSDYfh1ICEwkgpWJ9c7nuXsftauZT1wifr5nMTXLdKGksnKIoFvPgDzrpVDGWbpqhqEMhlgfgesrFLKbpWL6NfmLjRCHorUO8E6q0dDaB3AvU2d7_PufLq2ruok_WuyGh8dDbrpvP_NHwDEmF02A</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Haines, Victor Y</creator><creator>Merrheim, Grégoire</creator><creator>Roy, Mario</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><author>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety incentives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrheim, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haines, Victor Y</au><au>Merrheim, Grégoire</au><au>Roy, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>17-30</pages><issn>0022-4375</issn><eissn>1879-1247</eissn><coden>JSFRAV</coden><abstract>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant. Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives. Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment. Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4375
ispartof Journal of safety research, 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30
issn 0022-4375
1879-1247
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17900821
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Compensation
Effectiveness
Health
Incentives
Safety
safety incentives
title Understanding reactions to safety incentives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A10%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20reactions%20to%20safety%20incentives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20safety%20research&rft.au=Haines,%20Victor%20Y&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=17-30&rft.issn=0022-4375&rft.eissn=1879-1247&rft.coden=JSFRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17900821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218406157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true