Loading…
Understanding reactions to safety incentives
Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results. Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and grou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of safety research 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763 |
container_end_page | 30 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Journal of safety research |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Haines, Victor Y Merrheim, Grégoire Roy, Mario |
description | Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results.
Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant.
Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives.
Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment.
Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17900821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022437500000517</els_id><sourcerecordid>17900821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QSguRMHRe5PJoyuR4gsKLrTrkGYyktJmapIW-u9NW3HhxtXdfOdw7kfIOcItAoq7dwBKq5pJfgVwDQAcK3lAeqjksEJay0PS-0WOyUlKswIJjtgjN5PQuJiyCY0Pn4PojM2-C2mQu0EyrcubgQ_WhezXLp2So9bMkzv7uX0yeXr8GL1U47fn19HDuLJM8Fwx5ALrmgEVnFo5BAdMNVNujWiNpcAkSqWANUxJ6awSDYfh1ICEwkgpWJ9c7nuXsftauZT1wifr5nMTXLdKGksnKIoFvPgDzrpVDGWbpqhqEMhlgfgesrFLKbpWL6NfmLjRCHorUO8E6q0dDaB3AvU2d7_PufLq2ruok_WuyGh8dDbrpvP_NHwDEmF02A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218406157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results.
Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant.
Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives.
Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment.
Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Effectiveness ; Health ; Incentives ; Safety ; safety incentives</subject><ispartof>Journal of safety research, 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Spring 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrheim, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><title>Journal of safety research</title><description>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results.
Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant.
Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives.
Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment.
Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety incentives</subject><issn>0022-4375</issn><issn>1879-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QSguRMHRe5PJoyuR4gsKLrTrkGYyktJmapIW-u9NW3HhxtXdfOdw7kfIOcItAoq7dwBKq5pJfgVwDQAcK3lAeqjksEJay0PS-0WOyUlKswIJjtgjN5PQuJiyCY0Pn4PojM2-C2mQu0EyrcubgQ_WhezXLp2So9bMkzv7uX0yeXr8GL1U47fn19HDuLJM8Fwx5ALrmgEVnFo5BAdMNVNujWiNpcAkSqWANUxJ6awSDYfh1ICEwkgpWJ9c7nuXsftauZT1wifr5nMTXLdKGksnKIoFvPgDzrpVDGWbpqhqEMhlgfgesrFLKbpWL6NfmLjRCHorUO8E6q0dDaB3AvU2d7_PufLq2ruok_WuyGh8dDbrpvP_NHwDEmF02A</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Haines, Victor Y</creator><creator>Merrheim, Grégoire</creator><creator>Roy, Mario</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</title><author>Haines, Victor Y ; Merrheim, Grégoire ; Roy, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety incentives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haines, Victor Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrheim, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haines, Victor Y</au><au>Merrheim, Grégoire</au><au>Roy, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding reactions to safety incentives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>17-30</pages><issn>0022-4375</issn><eissn>1879-1247</eissn><coden>JSFRAV</coden><abstract>Problem: Safety incentives, defined broadly as reward techniques used to improve health and safety results, do not always produce the desired results.
Method: Using structural equation modeling and cross-level analysis procedures, this study investigated the relationships between individual and group-level variables, and reactions to a safety incentive program at a production plant.
Results: The data obtained from 329 team members support most of the predicted relationships. At the individual level of analysis, locus of control influenced supervisor–subordinate relationships, which, in turn, influenced perceived organizational support and reactions to safety incentives. At the group level, the interaction between group cohesiveness, safety norms, and task interdependence had a significant effect on reactions to safety incentives.
Discussion: The findings provide some insights into the functioning of safety incentives in a team environment.
Impact on industry: These findings indicate that safety incentive programs are more likely to be effective components of health and safety strategies when they are implemented in settings with positive supervisor–subordinate relationships and within interdependent teams that share safety norms.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4375 |
ispartof | Journal of safety research, 2001-03, Vol.32 (1), p.17-30 |
issn | 0022-4375 1879-1247 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17900821 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Compensation Effectiveness Health Incentives Safety safety incentives |
title | Understanding reactions to safety incentives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A10%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20reactions%20to%20safety%20incentives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20safety%20research&rft.au=Haines,%20Victor%20Y&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=17-30&rft.issn=0022-4375&rft.eissn=1879-1247&rft.coden=JSFRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00051-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17900821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-3156144302652c790e038db5ca6fac2037178803d3877ec86d509ba070b5c7763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218406157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |