Loading…

Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata

Although the concept that some plants benefit from being eaten is counterintuitive, there is now considerable evidence demonstrating enhanced fitness following herbivory. It has been assumed that plants growing in high resource conditions are the ones best able to compensate for herbivory. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia 2016-02, Vol.180 (2), p.463-474
Main Authors: Allsup, Cassandra M., Paige, Ken N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653
container_end_page 474
container_issue 2
container_start_page 463
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 180
creator Allsup, Cassandra M.
Paige, Ken N.
description Although the concept that some plants benefit from being eaten is counterintuitive, there is now considerable evidence demonstrating enhanced fitness following herbivory. It has been assumed that plants growing in high resource conditions are the ones best able to compensate for herbivory. However, just the opposite has been found for dicotyledonous plants exhibiting patterns of overcompensation, with most occurring in resource-poor conditions. Long-term studies of the monocarpic biennial, scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata growing in resource-poor conditions have shown that ungulate herbivory by mule deer and elk can result in a threefold increase in plant fitness over uneaten controls. These observations led us to hypothesize that fungal associations would facilitate the compensatory response most commonly observed in this Arizona population of scarlet gilia; perhaps mutualistic associations with fungi, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, would explain the phenomenon of overcompensation altogether. Fungal removal experiments, using Captan®, a commercially available fungicide, showed that a reduction in fungal abundance altered the compensatory response following ungulate herbivory, particularly in years in which water was limited, increasing fitness compensation from equal compensation to overcompensation. A multifactorial experiment revealed that the interactive effects of water and fungicide maximized fruit production following herbivory. Our results are counter to the “modification of tolerance hypothesis” in which plants associating with mycorrhizal fungi will have higher tolerance to herbivory. It is likely that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes compete with plants for photosynthates following herbivory, thereby limiting the magnitude of compensation. Thus, fungi appear to be parasitic on scarlet gilia following ungulate herbivory.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-015-3470-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790458681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A442890294</galeid><jstor_id>48718057</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A442890294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1TAQhoMo7nH1B3ihFLzRi65JmjTJ5e7ix4EFwY_rkKbT2kPb1CRl3X_vHM66ekRECm0yfd4XZuYl5CmjZ4xS9TpRKgQvKZNlJRQt9T2yYaLiJTOVuU82lHJTainMCXmU0o5SJpiUD8kJr4VRjIsNWS5gDNd9DOvcFt06924sXErBDy4PYU6Fw_q1yxCLYca387nIAc_duMLsochfofBhWmBOLod4U0RICwqhCF2xXcIUljSgTd9H6F12j8mDzo0Jntx-T8mXt28-X74vrz68216eX5VeGp1LbzqqneRMcGgapmquoW2dlC2wTrRNpanUjZPUNKBcrVujua-ZENJrvMvqlLw8-C4xfFshZTsNycM4uhnCmixThgqpa83-A62lUdrUCtEXf6C7sMYZG0FKGqp1LapfFE4TLM4qZBzc3tSe48K0wb0IpM7-QuHTwjT4MEM3YP1I8OpIgEyG77l3a0p2--njMcsOrI8hpQidXeIwuXhjGbX78NhDeCyGx-7DYzVqnt82tzYTtHeKn2lBgB-AhL_mHuJv3f_D9dlBtEuYjztToRXDHarqB4-S1zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1759088643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Allsup, Cassandra M. ; Paige, Ken N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allsup, Cassandra M. ; Paige, Ken N.</creatorcontrib><description>Although the concept that some plants benefit from being eaten is counterintuitive, there is now considerable evidence demonstrating enhanced fitness following herbivory. It has been assumed that plants growing in high resource conditions are the ones best able to compensate for herbivory. However, just the opposite has been found for dicotyledonous plants exhibiting patterns of overcompensation, with most occurring in resource-poor conditions. Long-term studies of the monocarpic biennial, scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata growing in resource-poor conditions have shown that ungulate herbivory by mule deer and elk can result in a threefold increase in plant fitness over uneaten controls. These observations led us to hypothesize that fungal associations would facilitate the compensatory response most commonly observed in this Arizona population of scarlet gilia; perhaps mutualistic associations with fungi, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, would explain the phenomenon of overcompensation altogether. Fungal removal experiments, using Captan®, a commercially available fungicide, showed that a reduction in fungal abundance altered the compensatory response following ungulate herbivory, particularly in years in which water was limited, increasing fitness compensation from equal compensation to overcompensation. A multifactorial experiment revealed that the interactive effects of water and fungicide maximized fruit production following herbivory. Our results are counter to the “modification of tolerance hypothesis” in which plants associating with mycorrhizal fungi will have higher tolerance to herbivory. It is likely that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes compete with plants for photosynthates following herbivory, thereby limiting the magnitude of compensation. Thus, fungi appear to be parasitic on scarlet gilia following ungulate herbivory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3470-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26497124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arizona ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Captan ; Compensation ; Crop production ; Ecology ; Elk ; Endophytes ; Fruit - growth &amp; development ; Fungi ; Fungi - growth &amp; development ; Fungi - physiology ; Fungicides ; Gilia ; Herbivory ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Ipomopsis aggregata ; Life Sciences ; Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; Mammals ; Mycorrhizae - physiology ; Photosynthesis ; Plant Sciences ; PLANT-MICROBE-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS - ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Stress, Physiological ; Symbiosis ; Water</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2016-02, Vol.180 (2), p.463-474</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48718057$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48718057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26497124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allsup, Cassandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paige, Ken N.</creatorcontrib><title>Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Although the concept that some plants benefit from being eaten is counterintuitive, there is now considerable evidence demonstrating enhanced fitness following herbivory. It has been assumed that plants growing in high resource conditions are the ones best able to compensate for herbivory. However, just the opposite has been found for dicotyledonous plants exhibiting patterns of overcompensation, with most occurring in resource-poor conditions. Long-term studies of the monocarpic biennial, scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata growing in resource-poor conditions have shown that ungulate herbivory by mule deer and elk can result in a threefold increase in plant fitness over uneaten controls. These observations led us to hypothesize that fungal associations would facilitate the compensatory response most commonly observed in this Arizona population of scarlet gilia; perhaps mutualistic associations with fungi, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, would explain the phenomenon of overcompensation altogether. Fungal removal experiments, using Captan®, a commercially available fungicide, showed that a reduction in fungal abundance altered the compensatory response following ungulate herbivory, particularly in years in which water was limited, increasing fitness compensation from equal compensation to overcompensation. A multifactorial experiment revealed that the interactive effects of water and fungicide maximized fruit production following herbivory. Our results are counter to the “modification of tolerance hypothesis” in which plants associating with mycorrhizal fungi will have higher tolerance to herbivory. It is likely that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes compete with plants for photosynthates following herbivory, thereby limiting the magnitude of compensation. Thus, fungi appear to be parasitic on scarlet gilia following ungulate herbivory.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Captan</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Elk</subject><subject>Endophytes</subject><subject>Fruit - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Fungi - physiology</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Gilia</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Ipomopsis aggregata</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mycorrhizae - physiology</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>PLANT-MICROBE-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl2L1TAQhoMo7nH1B3ihFLzRi65JmjTJ5e7ix4EFwY_rkKbT2kPb1CRl3X_vHM66ekRECm0yfd4XZuYl5CmjZ4xS9TpRKgQvKZNlJRQt9T2yYaLiJTOVuU82lHJTainMCXmU0o5SJpiUD8kJr4VRjIsNWS5gDNd9DOvcFt06924sXErBDy4PYU6Fw_q1yxCLYca387nIAc_duMLsochfofBhWmBOLod4U0RICwqhCF2xXcIUljSgTd9H6F12j8mDzo0Jntx-T8mXt28-X74vrz68216eX5VeGp1LbzqqneRMcGgapmquoW2dlC2wTrRNpanUjZPUNKBcrVujua-ZENJrvMvqlLw8-C4xfFshZTsNycM4uhnCmixThgqpa83-A62lUdrUCtEXf6C7sMYZG0FKGqp1LapfFE4TLM4qZBzc3tSe48K0wb0IpM7-QuHTwjT4MEM3YP1I8OpIgEyG77l3a0p2--njMcsOrI8hpQidXeIwuXhjGbX78NhDeCyGx-7DYzVqnt82tzYTtHeKn2lBgB-AhL_mHuJv3f_D9dlBtEuYjztToRXDHarqB4-S1zw</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Allsup, Cassandra M.</creator><creator>Paige, Ken N.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata</title><author>Allsup, Cassandra M. ; Paige, Ken N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Captan</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Elk</topic><topic>Endophytes</topic><topic>Fruit - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Fungi - physiology</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Gilia</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Ipomopsis aggregata</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mycorrhizae - physiology</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>PLANT-MICROBE-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allsup, Cassandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paige, Ken N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allsup, Cassandra M.</au><au>Paige, Ken N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>180</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>463-474</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Although the concept that some plants benefit from being eaten is counterintuitive, there is now considerable evidence demonstrating enhanced fitness following herbivory. It has been assumed that plants growing in high resource conditions are the ones best able to compensate for herbivory. However, just the opposite has been found for dicotyledonous plants exhibiting patterns of overcompensation, with most occurring in resource-poor conditions. Long-term studies of the monocarpic biennial, scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata growing in resource-poor conditions have shown that ungulate herbivory by mule deer and elk can result in a threefold increase in plant fitness over uneaten controls. These observations led us to hypothesize that fungal associations would facilitate the compensatory response most commonly observed in this Arizona population of scarlet gilia; perhaps mutualistic associations with fungi, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, would explain the phenomenon of overcompensation altogether. Fungal removal experiments, using Captan®, a commercially available fungicide, showed that a reduction in fungal abundance altered the compensatory response following ungulate herbivory, particularly in years in which water was limited, increasing fitness compensation from equal compensation to overcompensation. A multifactorial experiment revealed that the interactive effects of water and fungicide maximized fruit production following herbivory. Our results are counter to the “modification of tolerance hypothesis” in which plants associating with mycorrhizal fungi will have higher tolerance to herbivory. It is likely that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes compete with plants for photosynthates following herbivory, thereby limiting the magnitude of compensation. Thus, fungi appear to be parasitic on scarlet gilia following ungulate herbivory.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>26497124</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-015-3470-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2016-02, Vol.180 (2), p.463-474
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790458681
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Animals
Arizona
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Captan
Compensation
Crop production
Ecology
Elk
Endophytes
Fruit - growth & development
Fungi
Fungi - growth & development
Fungi - physiology
Fungicides
Gilia
Herbivory
Hydrology/Water Resources
Ipomopsis aggregata
Life Sciences
Magnoliopsida - growth & development
Magnoliopsida - physiology
Mammals
Mycorrhizae - physiology
Photosynthesis
Plant Sciences
PLANT-MICROBE-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS - ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Stress, Physiological
Symbiosis
Water
title Belowground fungal associations and water interact to influence the compensatory response of Ipomopsis aggregata
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Belowground%20fungal%20associations%20and%20water%20interact%20to%20influence%20the%20compensatory%20response%20of%20Ipomopsis%20aggregata&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Allsup,%20Cassandra%20M.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=180&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=463-474&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-015-3470-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA442890294%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-c9f08a52142ebb17628edda55de1f4db38058ba509be7a68d982c61445c87a653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1759088643&rft_id=info:pmid/26497124&rft_galeid=A442890294&rft_jstor_id=48718057&rfr_iscdi=true