Loading…

A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx

Post-release monitoring, including abundance estimation, is an important part of reintroductions, providing a basis for management intervention designed to achieve long-term persistence. The Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx became extinct in the wild in 1972, surviving as captive populations. Since 1982 r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oryx 2003-07, Vol.37 (3), p.286-294
Main Authors: Seddon, Philip J., Ismail, Khairy, Shobrak, Mohammed, Ostrowski, Stephane, Magin, Chris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e3557175c86f70e60cee2821e4ef7db6359e2ed082603a62f525c8bca1a3ac263
cites
container_end_page 294
container_issue 3
container_start_page 286
container_title Oryx
container_volume 37
creator Seddon, Philip J.
Ismail, Khairy
Shobrak, Mohammed
Ostrowski, Stephane
Magin, Chris
description Post-release monitoring, including abundance estimation, is an important part of reintroductions, providing a basis for management intervention designed to achieve long-term persistence. The Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx became extinct in the wild in 1972, surviving as captive populations. Since 1982 reintroductions of Arabian oryx have taken place in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Modelling of oryx population dynamics has highlighted the importance of precise estimation of population size (N). Between 1990 and 2000 three methods of estimating N have been applied in Mahazat as-Sayd protected area in Saudi Arabia: derived population estimates (DPE) based on known births and deaths, distance sampling, and mark-resighting (MR). This study assesses the feasibility and precision of these methods. Inability to assess precision, interdependence of consecutive estimates, and the assumption that all gains and losses are recorded, make DPE of limited value. At current densities, distance sampling along 455 km of driven transects yields too few detections to derive precise estimates of N. To achieve a coefficient of variation of 20% it would be necessary to drive up to c. 2,900 km of transect; this amount of survey effort could be achieved through pooling of data across repeat surveys of established transects. MR estimates, based on re-sighting of collared oryx, have the potential to yield the most precise estimates of N when the proportion of marked animals reaches 30% of the total population. The most reliable MR estimates available indicate the Mahazat as-Sayd Arabian oryx population had grown to >400 animals by 2000.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0030605303000541
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17906044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0030605303000541</cupid><sourcerecordid>17906044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e3557175c86f70e60cee2821e4ef7db6359e2ed082603a62f525c8bca1a3ac263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbhZPfREqP_E9u5xVUGpVAlVLVwtrzPZdZvEqe2glsfpk3airaAq4jTyzG_mG39DyEfOPnPGzfElY5JppiQGxlTNX5EFl1pV-Fy-Jou5XM31t-RdztfI6NqoBXlYUx_70aWQ40BjSxtI4Rc0dIzj1LkSMAu5hN4V-ER7l26qBDlsdyUMW-qGhjYhFzd4oNn1Yzdneyi72GRaIk4rkPowAC07eD4zh98wyzlEMqRCp2E711BkJtfJbYLDhdL93XvypnVdhg9P8YD8-Prl6uRbdf799OxkfV75WuhSgVTKcKP8UreGgWYeQCwFhxpa02y0VCsQ0LCl0Ew6LVolkN14x510Xmh5QI72c8cUbyf8tO1D9tB1boA4ZcvNCh2uawQPX4DXcUoD7maFEJKZms8Q30M-xZwTtHZM6GK6t5zZ-WT2n5NhT7XvQUvh7k8Dmm61kUZZfXphVz-v1KW8UFYgL580XL9JodnC303-r_IILYepsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222307414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Seddon, Philip J. ; Ismail, Khairy ; Shobrak, Mohammed ; Ostrowski, Stephane ; Magin, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Seddon, Philip J. ; Ismail, Khairy ; Shobrak, Mohammed ; Ostrowski, Stephane ; Magin, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Post-release monitoring, including abundance estimation, is an important part of reintroductions, providing a basis for management intervention designed to achieve long-term persistence. The Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx became extinct in the wild in 1972, surviving as captive populations. Since 1982 reintroductions of Arabian oryx have taken place in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Modelling of oryx population dynamics has highlighted the importance of precise estimation of population size (N). Between 1990 and 2000 three methods of estimating N have been applied in Mahazat as-Sayd protected area in Saudi Arabia: derived population estimates (DPE) based on known births and deaths, distance sampling, and mark-resighting (MR). This study assesses the feasibility and precision of these methods. Inability to assess precision, interdependence of consecutive estimates, and the assumption that all gains and losses are recorded, make DPE of limited value. At current densities, distance sampling along 455 km of driven transects yields too few detections to derive precise estimates of N. To achieve a coefficient of variation of 20% it would be necessary to drive up to c. 2,900 km of transect; this amount of survey effort could be achieved through pooling of data across repeat surveys of established transects. MR estimates, based on re-sighting of collared oryx, have the potential to yield the most precise estimates of N when the proportion of marked animals reaches 30% of the total population. The most reliable MR estimates available indicate the Mahazat as-Sayd Arabian oryx population had grown to &gt;400 animals by 2000.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-6053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3008</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0030605303000541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Births ; Estimates ; Extinction ; Oryx leucoryx ; Population</subject><ispartof>Oryx, 2003-07, Vol.37 (3), p.286-294</ispartof><rights>2003 Fauna &amp; Flora International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e3557175c86f70e60cee2821e4ef7db6359e2ed082603a62f525c8bca1a3ac263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605303000541/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72703</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seddon, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Khairy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shobrak, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrowski, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magin, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx</title><title>Oryx</title><addtitle>Oryx</addtitle><description>Post-release monitoring, including abundance estimation, is an important part of reintroductions, providing a basis for management intervention designed to achieve long-term persistence. The Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx became extinct in the wild in 1972, surviving as captive populations. Since 1982 reintroductions of Arabian oryx have taken place in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Modelling of oryx population dynamics has highlighted the importance of precise estimation of population size (N). Between 1990 and 2000 three methods of estimating N have been applied in Mahazat as-Sayd protected area in Saudi Arabia: derived population estimates (DPE) based on known births and deaths, distance sampling, and mark-resighting (MR). This study assesses the feasibility and precision of these methods. Inability to assess precision, interdependence of consecutive estimates, and the assumption that all gains and losses are recorded, make DPE of limited value. At current densities, distance sampling along 455 km of driven transects yields too few detections to derive precise estimates of N. To achieve a coefficient of variation of 20% it would be necessary to drive up to c. 2,900 km of transect; this amount of survey effort could be achieved through pooling of data across repeat surveys of established transects. MR estimates, based on re-sighting of collared oryx, have the potential to yield the most precise estimates of N when the proportion of marked animals reaches 30% of the total population. The most reliable MR estimates available indicate the Mahazat as-Sayd Arabian oryx population had grown to &gt;400 animals by 2000.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Oryx leucoryx</subject><subject>Population</subject><issn>0030-6053</issn><issn>1365-3008</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbhZPfREqP_E9u5xVUGpVAlVLVwtrzPZdZvEqe2glsfpk3airaAq4jTyzG_mG39DyEfOPnPGzfElY5JppiQGxlTNX5EFl1pV-Fy-Jou5XM31t-RdztfI6NqoBXlYUx_70aWQ40BjSxtI4Rc0dIzj1LkSMAu5hN4V-ER7l26qBDlsdyUMW-qGhjYhFzd4oNn1Yzdneyi72GRaIk4rkPowAC07eD4zh98wyzlEMqRCp2E711BkJtfJbYLDhdL93XvypnVdhg9P8YD8-Prl6uRbdf799OxkfV75WuhSgVTKcKP8UreGgWYeQCwFhxpa02y0VCsQ0LCl0Ew6LVolkN14x510Xmh5QI72c8cUbyf8tO1D9tB1boA4ZcvNCh2uawQPX4DXcUoD7maFEJKZms8Q30M-xZwTtHZM6GK6t5zZ-WT2n5NhT7XvQUvh7k8Dmm61kUZZfXphVz-v1KW8UFYgL580XL9JodnC303-r_IILYepsA</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Seddon, Philip J.</creator><creator>Ismail, Khairy</creator><creator>Shobrak, Mohammed</creator><creator>Ostrowski, Stephane</creator><creator>Magin, Chris</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx</title><author>Seddon, Philip J. ; Ismail, Khairy ; Shobrak, Mohammed ; Ostrowski, Stephane ; Magin, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e3557175c86f70e60cee2821e4ef7db6359e2ed082603a62f525c8bca1a3ac263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Oryx leucoryx</topic><topic>Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seddon, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Khairy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shobrak, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrowski, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magin, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oryx</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seddon, Philip J.</au><au>Ismail, Khairy</au><au>Shobrak, Mohammed</au><au>Ostrowski, Stephane</au><au>Magin, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx</atitle><jtitle>Oryx</jtitle><addtitle>Oryx</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>286-294</pages><issn>0030-6053</issn><eissn>1365-3008</eissn><abstract>Post-release monitoring, including abundance estimation, is an important part of reintroductions, providing a basis for management intervention designed to achieve long-term persistence. The Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx became extinct in the wild in 1972, surviving as captive populations. Since 1982 reintroductions of Arabian oryx have taken place in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Modelling of oryx population dynamics has highlighted the importance of precise estimation of population size (N). Between 1990 and 2000 three methods of estimating N have been applied in Mahazat as-Sayd protected area in Saudi Arabia: derived population estimates (DPE) based on known births and deaths, distance sampling, and mark-resighting (MR). This study assesses the feasibility and precision of these methods. Inability to assess precision, interdependence of consecutive estimates, and the assumption that all gains and losses are recorded, make DPE of limited value. At current densities, distance sampling along 455 km of driven transects yields too few detections to derive precise estimates of N. To achieve a coefficient of variation of 20% it would be necessary to drive up to c. 2,900 km of transect; this amount of survey effort could be achieved through pooling of data across repeat surveys of established transects. MR estimates, based on re-sighting of collared oryx, have the potential to yield the most precise estimates of N when the proportion of marked animals reaches 30% of the total population. The most reliable MR estimates available indicate the Mahazat as-Sayd Arabian oryx population had grown to &gt;400 animals by 2000.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0030605303000541</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-6053
ispartof Oryx, 2003-07, Vol.37 (3), p.286-294
issn 0030-6053
1365-3008
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17906044
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Births
Estimates
Extinction
Oryx leucoryx
Population
title A comparison of derived population estimate, mark-resighting and distance sampling methods to determine the population size of a desert ungulate, the Arabian oryx
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20derived%20population%20estimate,%20mark-resighting%20and%20distance%20sampling%20methods%20to%20determine%20the%20population%20size%20of%20a%20desert%20ungulate,%20the%20Arabian%20oryx&rft.jtitle=Oryx&rft.au=Seddon,%20Philip%20J.&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=286-294&rft.issn=0030-6053&rft.eissn=1365-3008&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0030605303000541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17906044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e3557175c86f70e60cee2821e4ef7db6359e2ed082603a62f525c8bca1a3ac263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222307414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0030605303000541&rfr_iscdi=true