Loading…

Adults with a history of illicit amphetamine use exhibit abnormal substantia nigra morphology and parkinsonism

Abstract Introduction The sonographic appearance of the substantia nigra is abnormally bright and enlarged (hyperechogenic) in young adults with a history of illicit stimulant use. The abnormality is a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease. The aim of the current study was to identify the type of illi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parkinsonism & related disorders 2016-04, Vol.25, p.27-32
Main Authors: Todd, Gabrielle, Pearson-Dennett, Verity, Wilcox, Robert A, Chau, Minh T, Thoirs, Kerry, Thewlis, Dominic, Vogel, Adam P, White, Jason M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction The sonographic appearance of the substantia nigra is abnormally bright and enlarged (hyperechogenic) in young adults with a history of illicit stimulant use. The abnormality is a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease. The aim of the current study was to identify the type of illicit stimulant drug associated with substantia nigra hyperechogenicity and to determine if individuals with a history of illicit stimulant use exhibit clinical signs of parkinsonism. We hypothesised that use of amphetamines (primarily methamphetamine) is associated with substantia nigra hyperechogenicity and clinical signs of parkinsonism. Methods: The area of echogenic signal in the substantia nigra was measured in abstinent human amphetamine users (n=27; 33±8 yrs) and in three control groups comprising a) ‘ecstasy’ users (n=19; 23±3 years), b) cannabis users (n=30; 26±8 years), and c) non-drug users (n=37; 25±7 years). A subset of subjects (n=55) also underwent a neurological examination comprising the third and fifth part of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Results: Area of substantia nigra echogenicity was significantly larger in the amphetamine group (0.276±0.080 cm2 ) than in the control groups (0.200±0.075, 0.190±0.049, 0.191±0.055 cm2 , respectively; P
ISSN:1353-8020
1873-5126
DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.02.019