Loading…

Twelve-month discontinuation of etonogestrel implant in an outpatient pediatric setting

The etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant is the most effective reversible contraceptive method. Uptake remains limited in adolescents, a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to determine the 12-month discontinuation rate of the ENG implant among ado...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2016-07, Vol.94 (1), p.81-86
Main Authors: Berlan, Elise, Mizraji, Kelly, Bonny, Andrea E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant is the most effective reversible contraceptive method. Uptake remains limited in adolescents, a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to determine the 12-month discontinuation rate of the ENG implant among adolescents in an outpatient setting and to characterize risk factors for discontinuation. A retrospective chart review identified adolescent females aged 12 to 22years who received the ENG implant in one pediatric institution between January 1, 2011, and April 15, 2014. Patients were categorized into ENG discontinuers (removed prior to 12months) and ENG continuers (continued for ≥12months). Associations between demographic, clinical and postplacement characteristics with ENG discontinuation category were assessed with t tests, χ2/Fisher's Exact Tests and backwards stepwise logistic regression. Of the 750 patients who had an ENG implant inserted, 77 (10.3%) had the device removed prior to 12months of use. The mean length of implant use for those who discontinued was 7.5months. Problematic bleeding was the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation. Older age at time of insertion, history of pregnancy and ≥1 medical visit for implant concerns (not including removal) were independently predictive (p
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.030