Loading…
Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries
Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients sus...
Saved in:
Published in: | Thrombosis research 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393 |
container_end_page | 7 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Thrombosis research |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Kristoffersen, Ann Helen Ajzner, Eva Rogic, Dunja Sozmen, Eser Y Carraro, Paolo Faria, Ana Paula Watine, Joseph Meijer, Piet Sandberg, Sverre |
description | Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1792772578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0049384816302894</els_id><sourcerecordid>1792772578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhFSov2STYjhMnG6AqBSpVYgGsrcS-mfE0sYOv0zKvw5PiMB0WbFhYluXv_p1zs-yC0YJRVr_ZF3EX_BQAC57eBRUFpexJtmGNbHMuJH-abSgVbV42ojnLXiDuEyBZWz3PzrikTcXKepP9ukHyITd2gkAWBEM6rX0w1m1J9ESP1lndjaQbtz7YuJuQWEfiDoix3dZ5jFaTBx_u8mUmfiBzFy24iOQhwQQXnK223q1f9-D8guRP272HdEaL0ztySTAu5rDmRfuTXC_Bz9A5ov3iYrCAL7NnQzcivHq8z7PvH6-_XX3Ob798urm6vM21qFjMm76u6TqXaKpKmKGXutRSGE4bzWpodSs4001bCVmWfZlIOdSDkVxAx6uyLc-z18e8c_A_FsCoJosaxrFzkDpXTLZcSl7JJqH1EdXBIwYY1Bzs1IWDYlSt_qi9OvmjVn8UFSrJnwIvHmss_QTmb9jJkAS8PwKQJr23EBTqpKgGYwPoqIy3_6_x9p8UJxvv4AC490twSUfFFHJF1dd1S9YlYXVJedOK8jciT7yE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792772578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre</creator><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre ; On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) ; joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-3848</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27085136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Clinical algorithms ; Clinical decision rules ; D-dimer ; Decision Support Techniques ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Europe ; Female ; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physicians ; Pre-test probability ; Probability ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Venous thromboembolism ; Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Thrombosis research, 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4899-3294 ; 0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27085136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajzner, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogic, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozmen, Eser Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carraro, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Sverre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><title>Thrombosis research</title><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Clinical algorithms</subject><subject>Clinical decision rules</subject><subject>D-dimer</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pre-test probability</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Venous thromboembolism</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</subject><issn>0049-3848</issn><issn>1879-2472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhFSov2STYjhMnG6AqBSpVYgGsrcS-mfE0sYOv0zKvw5PiMB0WbFhYluXv_p1zs-yC0YJRVr_ZF3EX_BQAC57eBRUFpexJtmGNbHMuJH-abSgVbV42ojnLXiDuEyBZWz3PzrikTcXKepP9ukHyITd2gkAWBEM6rX0w1m1J9ESP1lndjaQbtz7YuJuQWEfiDoix3dZ5jFaTBx_u8mUmfiBzFy24iOQhwQQXnK223q1f9-D8guRP272HdEaL0ztySTAu5rDmRfuTXC_Bz9A5ov3iYrCAL7NnQzcivHq8z7PvH6-_XX3Ob798urm6vM21qFjMm76u6TqXaKpKmKGXutRSGE4bzWpodSs4001bCVmWfZlIOdSDkVxAx6uyLc-z18e8c_A_FsCoJosaxrFzkDpXTLZcSl7JJqH1EdXBIwYY1Bzs1IWDYlSt_qi9OvmjVn8UFSrJnwIvHmss_QTmb9jJkAS8PwKQJr23EBTqpKgGYwPoqIy3_6_x9p8UJxvv4AC490twSUfFFHJF1dd1S9YlYXVJedOK8jciT7yE</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creator><creator>Ajzner, Eva</creator><creator>Rogic, Dunja</creator><creator>Sozmen, Eser Y</creator><creator>Carraro, Paolo</creator><creator>Faria, Ana Paula</creator><creator>Watine, Joseph</creator><creator>Meijer, Piet</creator><creator>Sandberg, Sverre</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-3294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><author>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Clinical algorithms</topic><topic>Clinical decision rules</topic><topic>D-dimer</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pre-test probability</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Venous thromboembolism</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajzner, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogic, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozmen, Eser Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carraro, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Sverre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</au><au>Ajzner, Eva</au><au>Rogic, Dunja</au><au>Sozmen, Eser Y</au><au>Carraro, Paolo</au><au>Faria, Ana Paula</au><au>Watine, Joseph</au><au>Meijer, Piet</au><au>Sandberg, Sverre</au><aucorp>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</aucorp><aucorp>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</atitle><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0049-3848</issn><eissn>1879-2472</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27085136</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-3294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-3848 |
ispartof | Thrombosis research, 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7 |
issn | 0049-3848 1879-2472 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1792772578 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Algorithms Clinical algorithms Clinical decision rules D-dimer Decision Support Techniques Emergency Service, Hospital Europe Female Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Male Middle Aged Physicians Pre-test probability Probability Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis Surveys and Questionnaires Venous thromboembolism Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis |
title | Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20D-dimer%20used%20according%20to%20clinical%20algorithms%20in%20the%20diagnostic%20work-up%20of%20patients%20with%20suspicion%20of%20venous%20thromboembolism?%20A%20study%20in%20six%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Thrombosis%20research&rft.au=Kristoffersen,%20Ann%20Helen&rft.aucorp=On%20behalf%20of%20the%20joint%20Working%20Group%20on%20Postanalytical%20Phase%20(WG-POST)%20of%20the%20European%20Federation%20of%20Clinical%20Chemistry%20and%20Laboratory%20Medicine%20(EFLM)%20and%20European%20Organisation%20for%20External%20Quality%20Assurance%20Providers%20in%20Laboratory%20Medicine%20(EQALM)&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0049-3848&rft.eissn=1879-2472&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1792772578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792772578&rft_id=info:pmid/27085136&rfr_iscdi=true |