Loading…

Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries

Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients sus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thrombosis research 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7
Main Authors: Kristoffersen, Ann Helen, Ajzner, Eva, Rogic, Dunja, Sozmen, Eser Y, Carraro, Paolo, Faria, Ana Paula, Watine, Joseph, Meijer, Piet, Sandberg, Sverre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393
container_end_page 7
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Thrombosis research
container_volume 142
creator Kristoffersen, Ann Helen
Ajzner, Eva
Rogic, Dunja
Sozmen, Eser Y
Carraro, Paolo
Faria, Ana Paula
Watine, Joseph
Meijer, Piet
Sandberg, Sverre
description Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1792772578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0049384816302894</els_id><sourcerecordid>1792772578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhFSov2STYjhMnG6AqBSpVYgGsrcS-mfE0sYOv0zKvw5PiMB0WbFhYluXv_p1zs-yC0YJRVr_ZF3EX_BQAC57eBRUFpexJtmGNbHMuJH-abSgVbV42ojnLXiDuEyBZWz3PzrikTcXKepP9ukHyITd2gkAWBEM6rX0w1m1J9ESP1lndjaQbtz7YuJuQWEfiDoix3dZ5jFaTBx_u8mUmfiBzFy24iOQhwQQXnK223q1f9-D8guRP272HdEaL0ztySTAu5rDmRfuTXC_Bz9A5ov3iYrCAL7NnQzcivHq8z7PvH6-_XX3Ob798urm6vM21qFjMm76u6TqXaKpKmKGXutRSGE4bzWpodSs4001bCVmWfZlIOdSDkVxAx6uyLc-z18e8c_A_FsCoJosaxrFzkDpXTLZcSl7JJqH1EdXBIwYY1Bzs1IWDYlSt_qi9OvmjVn8UFSrJnwIvHmss_QTmb9jJkAS8PwKQJr23EBTqpKgGYwPoqIy3_6_x9p8UJxvv4AC490twSUfFFHJF1dd1S9YlYXVJedOK8jciT7yE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792772578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre</creator><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre ; On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) ; joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-3848</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27085136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Clinical algorithms ; Clinical decision rules ; D-dimer ; Decision Support Techniques ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Europe ; Female ; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physicians ; Pre-test probability ; Probability ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Venous thromboembolism ; Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Thrombosis research, 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4899-3294 ; 0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27085136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajzner, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogic, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozmen, Eser Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carraro, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Sverre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><title>Thrombosis research</title><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Clinical algorithms</subject><subject>Clinical decision rules</subject><subject>D-dimer</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pre-test probability</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Venous thromboembolism</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</subject><issn>0049-3848</issn><issn>1879-2472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhFSov2STYjhMnG6AqBSpVYgGsrcS-mfE0sYOv0zKvw5PiMB0WbFhYluXv_p1zs-yC0YJRVr_ZF3EX_BQAC57eBRUFpexJtmGNbHMuJH-abSgVbV42ojnLXiDuEyBZWz3PzrikTcXKepP9ukHyITd2gkAWBEM6rX0w1m1J9ESP1lndjaQbtz7YuJuQWEfiDoix3dZ5jFaTBx_u8mUmfiBzFy24iOQhwQQXnK223q1f9-D8guRP272HdEaL0ztySTAu5rDmRfuTXC_Bz9A5ov3iYrCAL7NnQzcivHq8z7PvH6-_XX3Ob798urm6vM21qFjMm76u6TqXaKpKmKGXutRSGE4bzWpodSs4001bCVmWfZlIOdSDkVxAx6uyLc-z18e8c_A_FsCoJosaxrFzkDpXTLZcSl7JJqH1EdXBIwYY1Bzs1IWDYlSt_qi9OvmjVn8UFSrJnwIvHmss_QTmb9jJkAS8PwKQJr23EBTqpKgGYwPoqIy3_6_x9p8UJxvv4AC490twSUfFFHJF1dd1S9YlYXVJedOK8jciT7yE</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creator><creator>Ajzner, Eva</creator><creator>Rogic, Dunja</creator><creator>Sozmen, Eser Y</creator><creator>Carraro, Paolo</creator><creator>Faria, Ana Paula</creator><creator>Watine, Joseph</creator><creator>Meijer, Piet</creator><creator>Sandberg, Sverre</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-3294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</title><author>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen ; Ajzner, Eva ; Rogic, Dunja ; Sozmen, Eser Y ; Carraro, Paolo ; Faria, Ana Paula ; Watine, Joseph ; Meijer, Piet ; Sandberg, Sverre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Clinical algorithms</topic><topic>Clinical decision rules</topic><topic>D-dimer</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pre-test probability</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Venous thromboembolism</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajzner, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogic, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozmen, Eser Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carraro, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watine, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Sverre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kristoffersen, Ann Helen</au><au>Ajzner, Eva</au><au>Rogic, Dunja</au><au>Sozmen, Eser Y</au><au>Carraro, Paolo</au><au>Faria, Ana Paula</au><au>Watine, Joseph</au><au>Meijer, Piet</au><au>Sandberg, Sverre</au><aucorp>On behalf of the joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</aucorp><aucorp>joint Working Group on Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries</atitle><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0049-3848</issn><eissn>1879-2472</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Clinical algorithms consisting of pre-test probability estimation and D-dimer testing are recommended in diagnostic work-up for suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to explore how physicians working in emergency departments investigated patients suspected to have VTE. Materials and methods A questionnaire with two case histories related to the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) (Case A) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (Case B) were sent to physicians in six European countries. The physicians were asked to estimate pre-test probability of VTE, and indicate their clinical actions. Results In total, 487 physicians were included. Sixty percent assessed pre-test probability of PE to be high in Case A, but 7% would still request only D-dimer and 11% would exclude PE if D-dimer was negative, which could be hazardous. Besides imaging, a D-dimer test was requested by 41%, which is a “waste of resources” (extra costs and efforts, no clinical benefit). For Case B, 92% assessed pre-test probability of DVT to be low. Correctly, only D-dimer was requested by 66% of the physicians, while 26% requested imaging, alone or in addition to D-dimer, which is a “waste of resources”. Conclusions These results should encourage scientific societies to improve the dissemination and knowledge of the current recommendations for the diagnosis of VTE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27085136</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-3294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-0856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-3848
ispartof Thrombosis research, 2016-06, Vol.142, p.1-7
issn 0049-3848
1879-2472
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1792772578
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Algorithms
Clinical algorithms
Clinical decision rules
D-dimer
Decision Support Techniques
Emergency Service, Hospital
Europe
Female
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians
Pre-test probability
Probability
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Venous thromboembolism
Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis
title Is D-dimer used according to clinical algorithms in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspicion of venous thromboembolism? A study in six European countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20D-dimer%20used%20according%20to%20clinical%20algorithms%20in%20the%20diagnostic%20work-up%20of%20patients%20with%20suspicion%20of%20venous%20thromboembolism?%20A%20study%20in%20six%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Thrombosis%20research&rft.au=Kristoffersen,%20Ann%20Helen&rft.aucorp=On%20behalf%20of%20the%20joint%20Working%20Group%20on%20Postanalytical%20Phase%20(WG-POST)%20of%20the%20European%20Federation%20of%20Clinical%20Chemistry%20and%20Laboratory%20Medicine%20(EFLM)%20and%20European%20Organisation%20for%20External%20Quality%20Assurance%20Providers%20in%20Laboratory%20Medicine%20(EQALM)&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0049-3848&rft.eissn=1879-2472&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1792772578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8b660708548554dfb7c3c74d208c16e9c9421c8954733b37087f6fd724ea25393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792772578&rft_id=info:pmid/27085136&rfr_iscdi=true