Loading…

A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China

A typical loess–paleosol sequence at Chaoyang in China, deposited continuously since 423ka BP, was examined to quantitatively reconstruct a loess–paleosol sequence. First, particle size distribution was evaluated based on clay-free fractions (where the sum of sand+silt=100%) and fine-earth fractions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoderma 2016-03, Vol.266, p.25-39
Main Authors: Sun, Zhong-Xiu, Owens, Phillip R., Han, Chun-Lan, Chen, Hui, Wang, Xiao-Lei, Wang, Qiu-Bing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3
container_end_page 39
container_issue
container_start_page 25
container_title Geoderma
container_volume 266
creator Sun, Zhong-Xiu
Owens, Phillip R.
Han, Chun-Lan
Chen, Hui
Wang, Xiao-Lei
Wang, Qiu-Bing
description A typical loess–paleosol sequence at Chaoyang in China, deposited continuously since 423ka BP, was examined to quantitatively reconstruct a loess–paleosol sequence. First, particle size distribution was evaluated based on clay-free fractions (where the sum of sand+silt=100%) and fine-earth fractions and used to characterize the parent material uniformity as well as field morphology, geochemical features, and micro-morphology characteristics. Second, mass balance (MB) and soil reconstruction (SR) approaches were employed to examine the linkage between pedogenesis and loess deposition. The results indicated a uniform loess deposit below 228cm depth, and the presence of four reddish stratigraphic layers interbedded with four yellowish stratigraphic layers, all derived mostly from silt eolian deposits. The main soil pedogenic processes following silt deposition were clay eluviation–illuviation, silification, and ferrallitization. The strongest pedogenesis occurred for the S3 deposit layer during 225–243ka BP and was associated with the greatest mass loss of non-clay (7.6%), Na2O (42%), CaO (21%), MgO (28%), SiO2 (10%), and at the same time with the greatest gains in clay (42%), Fe2O3 (8%), and Al2O3 (4%) together with mass loss changes (MC) of 620g/100cm2. The greatest mass gain changes (234g/100cm2) occurred in the L4 deposit layer during 243–311ka BP and were associated with gains in Na2O (18%) and P2O5 (4.5%) indicating the fastest deposition rate. During the long period of sedimentation (423ka BP) loess deposition was predominant during dry-cold periods, whereas paleosol formation from pedogenic processes was predominant during wet-warm periods. Thus, the formation of paleosols and loess deposition were dependent on the relative rate of pedogenesis and deposition as controlled by climate change. Under an East Asian summer monsoon (EAS) paleosol formation dominated, whereas loess deposition dominated under an East Asian winter monsoon (EAW). Quantification of the degree of loess development (paleosols) or loess deposits aids reconstructing soil genesis and understanding the loess–paleosol formation sequence and its linkage to climate change. •Two quantitative reconstruction models were used to examine paleosol formation.•Silt weathering and translocation were quantified as the main soil-forming process.•The deposition of loess was synchronized with pedogenic processes.•The formation of paleosol or loess depends on the relative rate of deposition and pedogen
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793240351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016706115301622</els_id><sourcerecordid>1768580604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EEtvCKyAfOZDUzh876amrVYFKlbjA2Zo6k8WrxN56nIreeuoL8IY8CV4t7bWcPNZ885NmPsY-SFFKIdXZrtxiGDDOUFZCtqWsSiGrV2wlO10Vqmr712wlMllooeRbdkK0y18tKrFij2t-u4BPLkFyd8gj2uApxcUmFzwPIwc-BST68_B7DxMGChMnvF3QW-RjsAvhwDP53NyiR3J0ztee4y-Y91PmYphzEOExFRLf_IRwD377KVfOwzv2ZoSJ8P2_95T9-Hz5ffO1uP725Wqzvi6gETIVtca66WsA3dUWWzEoZaEbxWj1gFZKpdqmaW8G3Y94I7BWVqrB6l7bDrTqoT5lH4-5-xjyDpTM7MjiNIHHsJCRuq-rRtSt_A9UdW0nlGgyqo6ojYEo4mj20c0Q740U5uDI7MyTI3NwZGRlsqM8eHEcxLzzncNoyLrDZQeXRSQzBPdSxF9kdaD1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768580604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sun, Zhong-Xiu ; Owens, Phillip R. ; Han, Chun-Lan ; Chen, Hui ; Wang, Xiao-Lei ; Wang, Qiu-Bing</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhong-Xiu ; Owens, Phillip R. ; Han, Chun-Lan ; Chen, Hui ; Wang, Xiao-Lei ; Wang, Qiu-Bing</creatorcontrib><description>A typical loess–paleosol sequence at Chaoyang in China, deposited continuously since 423ka BP, was examined to quantitatively reconstruct a loess–paleosol sequence. First, particle size distribution was evaluated based on clay-free fractions (where the sum of sand+silt=100%) and fine-earth fractions and used to characterize the parent material uniformity as well as field morphology, geochemical features, and micro-morphology characteristics. Second, mass balance (MB) and soil reconstruction (SR) approaches were employed to examine the linkage between pedogenesis and loess deposition. The results indicated a uniform loess deposit below 228cm depth, and the presence of four reddish stratigraphic layers interbedded with four yellowish stratigraphic layers, all derived mostly from silt eolian deposits. The main soil pedogenic processes following silt deposition were clay eluviation–illuviation, silification, and ferrallitization. The strongest pedogenesis occurred for the S3 deposit layer during 225–243ka BP and was associated with the greatest mass loss of non-clay (7.6%), Na2O (42%), CaO (21%), MgO (28%), SiO2 (10%), and at the same time with the greatest gains in clay (42%), Fe2O3 (8%), and Al2O3 (4%) together with mass loss changes (MC) of 620g/100cm2. The greatest mass gain changes (234g/100cm2) occurred in the L4 deposit layer during 243–311ka BP and were associated with gains in Na2O (18%) and P2O5 (4.5%) indicating the fastest deposition rate. During the long period of sedimentation (423ka BP) loess deposition was predominant during dry-cold periods, whereas paleosol formation from pedogenic processes was predominant during wet-warm periods. Thus, the formation of paleosols and loess deposition were dependent on the relative rate of pedogenesis and deposition as controlled by climate change. Under an East Asian summer monsoon (EAS) paleosol formation dominated, whereas loess deposition dominated under an East Asian winter monsoon (EAW). Quantification of the degree of loess development (paleosols) or loess deposits aids reconstructing soil genesis and understanding the loess–paleosol formation sequence and its linkage to climate change. •Two quantitative reconstruction models were used to examine paleosol formation.•Silt weathering and translocation were quantified as the main soil-forming process.•The deposition of loess was synchronized with pedogenic processes.•The formation of paleosol or loess depends on the relative rate of deposition and pedogenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Deposition ; Depositon ; Deposits ; Formations ; Gain ; Loess ; Loess–paleosol ; Paleoclimate ; Pedogenesis ; Reconstruction analysis ; Sand ; Silts ; Soil (material)</subject><ispartof>Geoderma, 2016-03, Vol.266, p.25-39</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhong-Xiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Phillip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Chun-Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiu-Bing</creatorcontrib><title>A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China</title><title>Geoderma</title><description>A typical loess–paleosol sequence at Chaoyang in China, deposited continuously since 423ka BP, was examined to quantitatively reconstruct a loess–paleosol sequence. First, particle size distribution was evaluated based on clay-free fractions (where the sum of sand+silt=100%) and fine-earth fractions and used to characterize the parent material uniformity as well as field morphology, geochemical features, and micro-morphology characteristics. Second, mass balance (MB) and soil reconstruction (SR) approaches were employed to examine the linkage between pedogenesis and loess deposition. The results indicated a uniform loess deposit below 228cm depth, and the presence of four reddish stratigraphic layers interbedded with four yellowish stratigraphic layers, all derived mostly from silt eolian deposits. The main soil pedogenic processes following silt deposition were clay eluviation–illuviation, silification, and ferrallitization. The strongest pedogenesis occurred for the S3 deposit layer during 225–243ka BP and was associated with the greatest mass loss of non-clay (7.6%), Na2O (42%), CaO (21%), MgO (28%), SiO2 (10%), and at the same time with the greatest gains in clay (42%), Fe2O3 (8%), and Al2O3 (4%) together with mass loss changes (MC) of 620g/100cm2. The greatest mass gain changes (234g/100cm2) occurred in the L4 deposit layer during 243–311ka BP and were associated with gains in Na2O (18%) and P2O5 (4.5%) indicating the fastest deposition rate. During the long period of sedimentation (423ka BP) loess deposition was predominant during dry-cold periods, whereas paleosol formation from pedogenic processes was predominant during wet-warm periods. Thus, the formation of paleosols and loess deposition were dependent on the relative rate of pedogenesis and deposition as controlled by climate change. Under an East Asian summer monsoon (EAS) paleosol formation dominated, whereas loess deposition dominated under an East Asian winter monsoon (EAW). Quantification of the degree of loess development (paleosols) or loess deposits aids reconstructing soil genesis and understanding the loess–paleosol formation sequence and its linkage to climate change. •Two quantitative reconstruction models were used to examine paleosol formation.•Silt weathering and translocation were quantified as the main soil-forming process.•The deposition of loess was synchronized with pedogenic processes.•The formation of paleosol or loess depends on the relative rate of deposition and pedogenesis.</description><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Depositon</subject><subject>Deposits</subject><subject>Formations</subject><subject>Gain</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Loess–paleosol</subject><subject>Paleoclimate</subject><subject>Pedogenesis</subject><subject>Reconstruction analysis</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Silts</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><issn>0016-7061</issn><issn>1872-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EEtvCKyAfOZDUzh876amrVYFKlbjA2Zo6k8WrxN56nIreeuoL8IY8CV4t7bWcPNZ885NmPsY-SFFKIdXZrtxiGDDOUFZCtqWsSiGrV2wlO10Vqmr712wlMllooeRbdkK0y18tKrFij2t-u4BPLkFyd8gj2uApxcUmFzwPIwc-BST68_B7DxMGChMnvF3QW-RjsAvhwDP53NyiR3J0ztee4y-Y91PmYphzEOExFRLf_IRwD377KVfOwzv2ZoSJ8P2_95T9-Hz5ffO1uP725Wqzvi6gETIVtca66WsA3dUWWzEoZaEbxWj1gFZKpdqmaW8G3Y94I7BWVqrB6l7bDrTqoT5lH4-5-xjyDpTM7MjiNIHHsJCRuq-rRtSt_A9UdW0nlGgyqo6ojYEo4mj20c0Q740U5uDI7MyTI3NwZGRlsqM8eHEcxLzzncNoyLrDZQeXRSQzBPdSxF9kdaD1</recordid><startdate>20160315</startdate><enddate>20160315</enddate><creator>Sun, Zhong-Xiu</creator><creator>Owens, Phillip R.</creator><creator>Han, Chun-Lan</creator><creator>Chen, Hui</creator><creator>Wang, Xiao-Lei</creator><creator>Wang, Qiu-Bing</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160315</creationdate><title>A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China</title><author>Sun, Zhong-Xiu ; Owens, Phillip R. ; Han, Chun-Lan ; Chen, Hui ; Wang, Xiao-Lei ; Wang, Qiu-Bing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Depositon</topic><topic>Deposits</topic><topic>Formations</topic><topic>Gain</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Loess–paleosol</topic><topic>Paleoclimate</topic><topic>Pedogenesis</topic><topic>Reconstruction analysis</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Silts</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhong-Xiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Phillip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Chun-Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiu-Bing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Zhong-Xiu</au><au>Owens, Phillip R.</au><au>Han, Chun-Lan</au><au>Chen, Hui</au><au>Wang, Xiao-Lei</au><au>Wang, Qiu-Bing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China</atitle><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle><date>2016-03-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>266</volume><spage>25</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>25-39</pages><issn>0016-7061</issn><eissn>1872-6259</eissn><abstract>A typical loess–paleosol sequence at Chaoyang in China, deposited continuously since 423ka BP, was examined to quantitatively reconstruct a loess–paleosol sequence. First, particle size distribution was evaluated based on clay-free fractions (where the sum of sand+silt=100%) and fine-earth fractions and used to characterize the parent material uniformity as well as field morphology, geochemical features, and micro-morphology characteristics. Second, mass balance (MB) and soil reconstruction (SR) approaches were employed to examine the linkage between pedogenesis and loess deposition. The results indicated a uniform loess deposit below 228cm depth, and the presence of four reddish stratigraphic layers interbedded with four yellowish stratigraphic layers, all derived mostly from silt eolian deposits. The main soil pedogenic processes following silt deposition were clay eluviation–illuviation, silification, and ferrallitization. The strongest pedogenesis occurred for the S3 deposit layer during 225–243ka BP and was associated with the greatest mass loss of non-clay (7.6%), Na2O (42%), CaO (21%), MgO (28%), SiO2 (10%), and at the same time with the greatest gains in clay (42%), Fe2O3 (8%), and Al2O3 (4%) together with mass loss changes (MC) of 620g/100cm2. The greatest mass gain changes (234g/100cm2) occurred in the L4 deposit layer during 243–311ka BP and were associated with gains in Na2O (18%) and P2O5 (4.5%) indicating the fastest deposition rate. During the long period of sedimentation (423ka BP) loess deposition was predominant during dry-cold periods, whereas paleosol formation from pedogenic processes was predominant during wet-warm periods. Thus, the formation of paleosols and loess deposition were dependent on the relative rate of pedogenesis and deposition as controlled by climate change. Under an East Asian summer monsoon (EAS) paleosol formation dominated, whereas loess deposition dominated under an East Asian winter monsoon (EAW). Quantification of the degree of loess development (paleosols) or loess deposits aids reconstructing soil genesis and understanding the loess–paleosol formation sequence and its linkage to climate change. •Two quantitative reconstruction models were used to examine paleosol formation.•Silt weathering and translocation were quantified as the main soil-forming process.•The deposition of loess was synchronized with pedogenic processes.•The formation of paleosol or loess depends on the relative rate of deposition and pedogenesis.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.012</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7061
ispartof Geoderma, 2016-03, Vol.266, p.25-39
issn 0016-7061
1872-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793240351
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Deposition
Depositon
Deposits
Formations
Gain
Loess
Loess–paleosol
Paleoclimate
Pedogenesis
Reconstruction analysis
Sand
Silts
Soil (material)
title A quantitative reconstruction of a loess–paleosol sequence focused on paleosol genesis: An example from a section at Chaoyang, China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A54%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20quantitative%20reconstruction%20of%20a%20loess%E2%80%93paleosol%20sequence%20focused%20on%20paleosol%20genesis:%20An%20example%20from%20a%20section%20at%20Chaoyang,%20China&rft.jtitle=Geoderma&rft.au=Sun,%20Zhong-Xiu&rft.date=2016-03-15&rft.volume=266&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=25-39&rft.issn=0016-7061&rft.eissn=1872-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768580604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-37e3493aa783ce50d66ca8f0fc7dec11665445bd79feb0e36c16dc797c8a769a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768580604&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true