Loading…
Performance of an active inspired hypoxic guard
Current hypoxic guards systems fail to maintain the inspired O 2 concentration (F I O 2 ) ≥ 21 % across the entire fresh gas flow (FGF) range when a second carrier gas is used (N 2 O or air). We examined the performance of the Maquet O 2 Guard ® , a smart hypoxic guard that increases O 2 delivery if...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2016-02, Vol.30 (1), p.63-68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Current hypoxic guards systems fail to maintain the inspired O
2
concentration (F
I
O
2
) ≥ 21 % across the entire fresh gas flow (FGF) range when a second carrier gas is used (N
2
O or air). We examined the performance of the Maquet O
2
Guard
®
, a smart hypoxic guard that increases O
2
delivery if an
inspired
hypoxic mixture is formed. After obtaining IRB approval and informed consent, 12 ASA I-II patients were enrolled. During anesthesia with sevoflurane in O
2
/air, the O
2
Guard
®
was tested by administering O
2
/air at the following
delivered
hypoxic guard limits [expressed as (total FGF in L min
−1
; F
D
O
2
in %)] for 4 min each: [0.3;67], [0.4;50], [0.6;34], [0.8;25], [1.0;21], [1.2;21], [1.5;21], [2;21], [3;21], and [5;21]. The following data were collected: (1) time from F
I
O
2
= 30 to 20 %; (2) time from F
I
O
2
= 20 % to O
2
Guard
®
activation; (3) time from O
2
Guard
®
activation to F
I
O
2
= 25 %; (4) FGF and F
D
O
2
used by the O
2
Guard. If SpO
2
was |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1387-1307 1573-2614 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10877-015-9684-9 |