Loading…

Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt

Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of concentrating solar power plants assist in identifying an effective and viable configuration. In this paper, a 4E (energy-exergy-environmental-economic) comparative study of 8 different configurations of parabolic trough solar thermal power plant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy (Oxford) 2015-08, Vol.88, p.292-303
Main Authors: Boukelia, T.E., Mecibah, M.S., Kumar, B.N., Reddy, K.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3
container_end_page 303
container_issue
container_start_page 292
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 88
creator Boukelia, T.E.
Mecibah, M.S.
Kumar, B.N.
Reddy, K.S.
description Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of concentrating solar power plants assist in identifying an effective and viable configuration. In this paper, a 4E (energy-exergy-environmental-economic) comparative study of 8 different configurations of parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with two different working fluids (Therminol VP-1 -oil and molten solar salt), with and without integrated thermal energy storage or/and backup fuel system is presented. The results of the comparative study indicate relevant differences among the 8 configurations. The molten solar salt configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system exhibits the highest overall energy efficiency (18.48%) compared to other configurations. Whereas, the highest overall exergy efficiency (21.77%), capacity factor (38.20%) and annual energy generation (114 GWh) are found for the oil based configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system. The results indicate that the configurations based on molten salt are better in terms of environmental and economical parameters. The configurations with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system are found to be techno-economical, but on the other hand are less environment friendly. A detailed comparison of these plants after optimization must be performed before drawing a final conclusion about the best configuration to be adopted in parabolic trough solar thermal power plant. •4E comparative study of 8 configurations of PTSTPP with two different fluids.•Comparison of the configurations with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system).•The overall energy efficiency of the salt plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The overall exergy efficiency of the oil plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The salt plants are the best configurations in terms of environ–eco parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.038
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793247889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544215006192</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793247889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFu2zAM1WED1qX9gx10bA_JZMuO5UuBLWi7AAV6aHYWaJlylCqWJ8kp8k39ySrxzkUJAhSE90i-R0J-ZGyRsWz5c7fAHn13XOQsKxcsJRdfyAXjSzYviyL_Rr6HsGOMlaKuL8jbuj9giKaDaFxPnabBWfB0AA-Ns0bR6N3YbengXjF9W-hjoK8mbin07fnhxkhNH7HzELGlm7tneh236Pdg6bQLDdF56PDmzLn_nQB6REsbUC_jQMMxRNzf0DGYvqNnaprrjD3Dp30C2HhJvmqwAa_-1xn5e3-3Wf2ZPz49rFe_Hucq6YtzoesWl0oLAMGXhVKNTsFa4BnqQmvQFXLeqoYXGbJaVQ0XVd1WyZJSNJXmM3I99R28-zcmd-TeBIU2aUc3BplVNc-LSoj6E9CKC57n5QlaTFDlXQgetRy82YM_yozJ0-nkTk52ydPpJEuZuDNyO9EwKT4Y9DIog73C1nhUUbbOfNzgHYxkqqc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773832259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Boukelia, T.E. ; Mecibah, M.S. ; Kumar, B.N. ; Reddy, K.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boukelia, T.E. ; Mecibah, M.S. ; Kumar, B.N. ; Reddy, K.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of concentrating solar power plants assist in identifying an effective and viable configuration. In this paper, a 4E (energy-exergy-environmental-economic) comparative study of 8 different configurations of parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with two different working fluids (Therminol VP-1 -oil and molten solar salt), with and without integrated thermal energy storage or/and backup fuel system is presented. The results of the comparative study indicate relevant differences among the 8 configurations. The molten solar salt configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system exhibits the highest overall energy efficiency (18.48%) compared to other configurations. Whereas, the highest overall exergy efficiency (21.77%), capacity factor (38.20%) and annual energy generation (114 GWh) are found for the oil based configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system. The results indicate that the configurations based on molten salt are better in terms of environmental and economical parameters. The configurations with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system are found to be techno-economical, but on the other hand are less environment friendly. A detailed comparison of these plants after optimization must be performed before drawing a final conclusion about the best configuration to be adopted in parabolic trough solar thermal power plant. •4E comparative study of 8 configurations of PTSTPP with two different fluids.•Comparison of the configurations with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system).•The overall energy efficiency of the salt plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The overall exergy efficiency of the oil plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The salt plants are the best configurations in terms of environ–eco parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Backups ; Electric power generation ; Electric power plants ; Energy management ; Energy-exergy-environmental-economic analyses ; Fossil fuels ; Fuel backup system ; Parabolic trough power plant ; Power plants ; Solar energy ; Solar heating ; Thermal energy ; Thermal energy storage</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2015-08, Vol.88, p.292-303</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boukelia, T.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mecibah, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of concentrating solar power plants assist in identifying an effective and viable configuration. In this paper, a 4E (energy-exergy-environmental-economic) comparative study of 8 different configurations of parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with two different working fluids (Therminol VP-1 -oil and molten solar salt), with and without integrated thermal energy storage or/and backup fuel system is presented. The results of the comparative study indicate relevant differences among the 8 configurations. The molten solar salt configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system exhibits the highest overall energy efficiency (18.48%) compared to other configurations. Whereas, the highest overall exergy efficiency (21.77%), capacity factor (38.20%) and annual energy generation (114 GWh) are found for the oil based configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system. The results indicate that the configurations based on molten salt are better in terms of environmental and economical parameters. The configurations with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system are found to be techno-economical, but on the other hand are less environment friendly. A detailed comparison of these plants after optimization must be performed before drawing a final conclusion about the best configuration to be adopted in parabolic trough solar thermal power plant. •4E comparative study of 8 configurations of PTSTPP with two different fluids.•Comparison of the configurations with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system).•The overall energy efficiency of the salt plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The overall exergy efficiency of the oil plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The salt plants are the best configurations in terms of environ–eco parameters.</description><subject>Backups</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Energy-exergy-environmental-economic analyses</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Fuel backup system</subject><subject>Parabolic trough power plant</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar heating</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><subject>Thermal energy storage</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUcFu2zAM1WED1qX9gx10bA_JZMuO5UuBLWi7AAV6aHYWaJlylCqWJ8kp8k39ySrxzkUJAhSE90i-R0J-ZGyRsWz5c7fAHn13XOQsKxcsJRdfyAXjSzYviyL_Rr6HsGOMlaKuL8jbuj9giKaDaFxPnabBWfB0AA-Ns0bR6N3YbengXjF9W-hjoK8mbin07fnhxkhNH7HzELGlm7tneh236Pdg6bQLDdF56PDmzLn_nQB6REsbUC_jQMMxRNzf0DGYvqNnaprrjD3Dp30C2HhJvmqwAa_-1xn5e3-3Wf2ZPz49rFe_Hucq6YtzoesWl0oLAMGXhVKNTsFa4BnqQmvQFXLeqoYXGbJaVQ0XVd1WyZJSNJXmM3I99R28-zcmd-TeBIU2aUc3BplVNc-LSoj6E9CKC57n5QlaTFDlXQgetRy82YM_yozJ0-nkTk52ydPpJEuZuDNyO9EwKT4Y9DIog73C1nhUUbbOfNzgHYxkqqc</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Boukelia, T.E.</creator><creator>Mecibah, M.S.</creator><creator>Kumar, B.N.</creator><creator>Reddy, K.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt</title><author>Boukelia, T.E. ; Mecibah, M.S. ; Kumar, B.N. ; Reddy, K.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Backups</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Energy-exergy-environmental-economic analyses</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Fuel backup system</topic><topic>Parabolic trough power plant</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar heating</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><topic>Thermal energy storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boukelia, T.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mecibah, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, K.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boukelia, T.E.</au><au>Mecibah, M.S.</au><au>Kumar, B.N.</au><au>Reddy, K.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>88</volume><spage>292</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>292-303</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><abstract>Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of concentrating solar power plants assist in identifying an effective and viable configuration. In this paper, a 4E (energy-exergy-environmental-economic) comparative study of 8 different configurations of parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with two different working fluids (Therminol VP-1 -oil and molten solar salt), with and without integrated thermal energy storage or/and backup fuel system is presented. The results of the comparative study indicate relevant differences among the 8 configurations. The molten solar salt configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system exhibits the highest overall energy efficiency (18.48%) compared to other configurations. Whereas, the highest overall exergy efficiency (21.77%), capacity factor (38.20%) and annual energy generation (114 GWh) are found for the oil based configuration with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system. The results indicate that the configurations based on molten salt are better in terms of environmental and economical parameters. The configurations with integrated thermal energy storage and fossil fuel backup system are found to be techno-economical, but on the other hand are less environment friendly. A detailed comparison of these plants after optimization must be performed before drawing a final conclusion about the best configuration to be adopted in parabolic trough solar thermal power plant. •4E comparative study of 8 configurations of PTSTPP with two different fluids.•Comparison of the configurations with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system).•The overall energy efficiency of the salt plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The overall exergy efficiency of the oil plant with TES and FBS is the highest.•The salt plants are the best configurations in terms of environ–eco parameters.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.038</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2015-08, Vol.88, p.292-303
issn 0360-5442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793247889
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Backups
Electric power generation
Electric power plants
Energy management
Energy-exergy-environmental-economic analyses
Fossil fuels
Fuel backup system
Parabolic trough power plant
Power plants
Solar energy
Solar heating
Thermal energy
Thermal energy storage
title Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A38%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20solar%20parabolic%20trough%20power%20plants%20with%20and%20without%20integrated%20TES%20(thermal%20energy%20storage)%20and%20FBS%20(fuel%20backup%20system)%20using%20thermic%20oil%20and%20solar%20salt&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Boukelia,%20T.E.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=88&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=292-303&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793247889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-8f9de6cf8aa8364ccbffff0da31ef4ffaf7e33dcb341e09c7b3879d700558b7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773832259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true