Loading…

In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery

•Based on the CAN data, tractor states were divided in to distinct load states.•NH3 application and field cultivation had three distinct tractor states.•Planting operation was found to have two distinct tractor states.•Specific power (kWtool−1 or kWrow−1) required by field operations were determined...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers and electronics in agriculture 2016-02, Vol.121, p.290-300
Main Authors: Pitla, Santosh K., Luck, Joe D., Werner, Jared, Lin, Nannan, Shearer, Scott A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133
container_end_page 300
container_issue
container_start_page 290
container_title Computers and electronics in agriculture
container_volume 121
creator Pitla, Santosh K.
Luck, Joe D.
Werner, Jared
Lin, Nannan
Shearer, Scott A.
description •Based on the CAN data, tractor states were divided in to distinct load states.•NH3 application and field cultivation had three distinct tractor states.•Planting operation was found to have two distinct tractor states.•Specific power (kWtool−1 or kWrow−1) required by field operations were determined. The ability to define in-field tractor load states offers the potential to better specify and characterize fuel consumption rate for various field operations. For the same field operation, the tractor experiences diverse load demands and corresponding fuel use rates as it maneuvers through straight passes, turns, suspended operation for adjustments, repair and maintenance, and biomass or other material transfer operations. It is challenging to determine the actual fuel rate and load states of agricultural machinery using force prediction models, and hence, some form of in-field data acquisition capability is required. Controller Area Networks (CAN) available on the current model tractors provide engine performance data which can be used to determine tractor load states in field conditions. In this study, CAN message data containing fuel rate, engine speed and percent torque were logged from the tractor’s diagnostic port during anhydrous NH3 application, field cultivation and planting operations. Time series and frequency plots of fuel rate and percent torque were generated to evaluate tractor load states. Based on the percent torque, engine speed and rated engine power, actual load on the tractor was calculated in each tractor load state. Anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation were characterized by three distinct tractor load states (TS-I, TS-II and TS-III) corresponding to idle states, parallel and headland passes, and turns, whereas corn planting was characterized by two load states (TS-I and TS-II): idle, and a combined state with parallel, headland passes and turns. For anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation at ground speeds of 7.64kmh−1 and 8.68kmh−1, average tractor load per tool and fuel use rate per tool of the implement were found to be 7.21kWtool−1, 3.28Lh−1tool−1, and 1.31kWtool−1, 0.64Lh−1tool−1, respectively. For planting, average tractor load per row and fuel use rate per row were found to be 4.65kWrow−1 and 1.70Lh−1row−1 at a ground speed of 7.04kmh−1.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793262216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168169916000041</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793262216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jCy27saqREsjeFEPoIBLpp12IsjVIFx04lu5C_r4O77moYOPfCPYzdAy-Ag3rcF7Y7HHFXCA7LAkTBhbxgMyi1yDVwfclmI1bmoKrqmt2ktOfjX5V6xlabNveBGpf5gZpsSJRh67KmQ5elHntKWecz3MVgh6YfIjbZhB_QfoWW4umWXXlsEt393Tn7fHn-WL_l2_fXzXq1za2UVZ-j9wAL8KjqkuraIaLQAJ4q75fWelVbHMfIWmmypdOqlpZbArdUWiBIOWcPU-8xdt8Dpd4cQrLUNNhSNyQDupJCCQFqRBcTamOXUiRvjjEcMJ4McHM2ZvZmMmbOxgwIMxobY09TjMYZP4GiSTZQa8mFSLY3rgv_F_wCR9p3OQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793262216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Pitla, Santosh K. ; Luck, Joe D. ; Werner, Jared ; Lin, Nannan ; Shearer, Scott A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitla, Santosh K. ; Luck, Joe D. ; Werner, Jared ; Lin, Nannan ; Shearer, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Based on the CAN data, tractor states were divided in to distinct load states.•NH3 application and field cultivation had three distinct tractor states.•Planting operation was found to have two distinct tractor states.•Specific power (kWtool−1 or kWrow−1) required by field operations were determined. The ability to define in-field tractor load states offers the potential to better specify and characterize fuel consumption rate for various field operations. For the same field operation, the tractor experiences diverse load demands and corresponding fuel use rates as it maneuvers through straight passes, turns, suspended operation for adjustments, repair and maintenance, and biomass or other material transfer operations. It is challenging to determine the actual fuel rate and load states of agricultural machinery using force prediction models, and hence, some form of in-field data acquisition capability is required. Controller Area Networks (CAN) available on the current model tractors provide engine performance data which can be used to determine tractor load states in field conditions. In this study, CAN message data containing fuel rate, engine speed and percent torque were logged from the tractor’s diagnostic port during anhydrous NH3 application, field cultivation and planting operations. Time series and frequency plots of fuel rate and percent torque were generated to evaluate tractor load states. Based on the percent torque, engine speed and rated engine power, actual load on the tractor was calculated in each tractor load state. Anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation were characterized by three distinct tractor load states (TS-I, TS-II and TS-III) corresponding to idle states, parallel and headland passes, and turns, whereas corn planting was characterized by two load states (TS-I and TS-II): idle, and a combined state with parallel, headland passes and turns. For anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation at ground speeds of 7.64kmh−1 and 8.68kmh−1, average tractor load per tool and fuel use rate per tool of the implement were found to be 7.21kWtool−1, 3.28Lh−1tool−1, and 1.31kWtool−1, 0.64Lh−1tool−1, respectively. For planting, average tractor load per row and fuel use rate per row were found to be 4.65kWrow−1 and 1.70Lh−1row−1 at a ground speed of 7.04kmh−1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>CAN ; Controller ; Controller area network ; Cultivation ; Engines ; Fuels ; Load ; Machinery ; Mathematical models ; Planting ; Torque ; Tractor ; Tractors</subject><ispartof>Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2016-02, Vol.121, p.290-300</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3713-4569</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitla, Santosh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Joe D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><title>In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery</title><title>Computers and electronics in agriculture</title><description>•Based on the CAN data, tractor states were divided in to distinct load states.•NH3 application and field cultivation had three distinct tractor states.•Planting operation was found to have two distinct tractor states.•Specific power (kWtool−1 or kWrow−1) required by field operations were determined. The ability to define in-field tractor load states offers the potential to better specify and characterize fuel consumption rate for various field operations. For the same field operation, the tractor experiences diverse load demands and corresponding fuel use rates as it maneuvers through straight passes, turns, suspended operation for adjustments, repair and maintenance, and biomass or other material transfer operations. It is challenging to determine the actual fuel rate and load states of agricultural machinery using force prediction models, and hence, some form of in-field data acquisition capability is required. Controller Area Networks (CAN) available on the current model tractors provide engine performance data which can be used to determine tractor load states in field conditions. In this study, CAN message data containing fuel rate, engine speed and percent torque were logged from the tractor’s diagnostic port during anhydrous NH3 application, field cultivation and planting operations. Time series and frequency plots of fuel rate and percent torque were generated to evaluate tractor load states. Based on the percent torque, engine speed and rated engine power, actual load on the tractor was calculated in each tractor load state. Anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation were characterized by three distinct tractor load states (TS-I, TS-II and TS-III) corresponding to idle states, parallel and headland passes, and turns, whereas corn planting was characterized by two load states (TS-I and TS-II): idle, and a combined state with parallel, headland passes and turns. For anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation at ground speeds of 7.64kmh−1 and 8.68kmh−1, average tractor load per tool and fuel use rate per tool of the implement were found to be 7.21kWtool−1, 3.28Lh−1tool−1, and 1.31kWtool−1, 0.64Lh−1tool−1, respectively. For planting, average tractor load per row and fuel use rate per row were found to be 4.65kWrow−1 and 1.70Lh−1row−1 at a ground speed of 7.04kmh−1.</description><subject>CAN</subject><subject>Controller</subject><subject>Controller area network</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Tractor</subject><subject>Tractors</subject><issn>0168-1699</issn><issn>1872-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jCy27saqREsjeFEPoIBLpp12IsjVIFx04lu5C_r4O77moYOPfCPYzdAy-Ag3rcF7Y7HHFXCA7LAkTBhbxgMyi1yDVwfclmI1bmoKrqmt2ktOfjX5V6xlabNveBGpf5gZpsSJRh67KmQ5elHntKWecz3MVgh6YfIjbZhB_QfoWW4umWXXlsEt393Tn7fHn-WL_l2_fXzXq1za2UVZ-j9wAL8KjqkuraIaLQAJ4q75fWelVbHMfIWmmypdOqlpZbArdUWiBIOWcPU-8xdt8Dpd4cQrLUNNhSNyQDupJCCQFqRBcTamOXUiRvjjEcMJ4McHM2ZvZmMmbOxgwIMxobY09TjMYZP4GiSTZQa8mFSLY3rgv_F_wCR9p3OQ</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Pitla, Santosh K.</creator><creator>Luck, Joe D.</creator><creator>Werner, Jared</creator><creator>Lin, Nannan</creator><creator>Shearer, Scott A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-4569</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery</title><author>Pitla, Santosh K. ; Luck, Joe D. ; Werner, Jared ; Lin, Nannan ; Shearer, Scott A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>CAN</topic><topic>Controller</topic><topic>Controller area network</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Tractor</topic><topic>Tractors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitla, Santosh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Joe D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitla, Santosh K.</au><au>Luck, Joe D.</au><au>Werner, Jared</au><au>Lin, Nannan</au><au>Shearer, Scott A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery</atitle><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>290</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>290-300</pages><issn>0168-1699</issn><eissn>1872-7107</eissn><abstract>•Based on the CAN data, tractor states were divided in to distinct load states.•NH3 application and field cultivation had three distinct tractor states.•Planting operation was found to have two distinct tractor states.•Specific power (kWtool−1 or kWrow−1) required by field operations were determined. The ability to define in-field tractor load states offers the potential to better specify and characterize fuel consumption rate for various field operations. For the same field operation, the tractor experiences diverse load demands and corresponding fuel use rates as it maneuvers through straight passes, turns, suspended operation for adjustments, repair and maintenance, and biomass or other material transfer operations. It is challenging to determine the actual fuel rate and load states of agricultural machinery using force prediction models, and hence, some form of in-field data acquisition capability is required. Controller Area Networks (CAN) available on the current model tractors provide engine performance data which can be used to determine tractor load states in field conditions. In this study, CAN message data containing fuel rate, engine speed and percent torque were logged from the tractor’s diagnostic port during anhydrous NH3 application, field cultivation and planting operations. Time series and frequency plots of fuel rate and percent torque were generated to evaluate tractor load states. Based on the percent torque, engine speed and rated engine power, actual load on the tractor was calculated in each tractor load state. Anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation were characterized by three distinct tractor load states (TS-I, TS-II and TS-III) corresponding to idle states, parallel and headland passes, and turns, whereas corn planting was characterized by two load states (TS-I and TS-II): idle, and a combined state with parallel, headland passes and turns. For anhydrous NH3 application and field cultivation at ground speeds of 7.64kmh−1 and 8.68kmh−1, average tractor load per tool and fuel use rate per tool of the implement were found to be 7.21kWtool−1, 3.28Lh−1tool−1, and 1.31kWtool−1, 0.64Lh−1tool−1, respectively. For planting, average tractor load per row and fuel use rate per row were found to be 4.65kWrow−1 and 1.70Lh−1row−1 at a ground speed of 7.04kmh−1.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.023</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-4569</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1699
ispartof Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2016-02, Vol.121, p.290-300
issn 0168-1699
1872-7107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793262216
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects CAN
Controller
Controller area network
Cultivation
Engines
Fuels
Load
Machinery
Mathematical models
Planting
Torque
Tractor
Tractors
title In-field fuel use and load states of agricultural field machinery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A11%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In-field%20fuel%20use%20and%20load%20states%20of%20agricultural%20field%20machinery&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20electronics%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Pitla,%20Santosh%20K.&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=290-300&rft.issn=0168-1699&rft.eissn=1872-7107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compag.2015.12.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793262216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-aff1141fa6b8ebbdaaa2711fe9ff5ccf6bca1013b67ec8d76b3c0ce1d5672a133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793262216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true