Ancillary Ligand Control of Electronic Structure in o-Benzoquinonediimine-Ruthenium Complex Redox Series: Structures, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR), and Ultraviolet−Visible−Near-Infrared (UV-vis-NIR) Spectroelectrochemistry

• Published in: Inorganic chemistry 2015-04, Vol.54 (7), p.3376-3386
• Main Authors: Das, Ankita, Ghosh, Prabir, Plebst, Sebastian, Schwederski, Brigitte, Mobin, Shaikh M, Kaim, Wolfgang, Lahiri, Goutam Kumar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accessibility; Computation; Electron paramagnetic resonance; Electronic structure; Ligands; Ruthenium; Spectators; Valence
• ISSN: 0020-1669; 1520-510X
• DOI: 10.1021/ic503070j

The compounds Ru­(acac)2(Q) (1), [Ru­(bpy)2(Q)]­(ClO4)2 ([2]­(ClO4)2), and [Ru­(pap)2(Q)]­PF6 ([3]­PF6), containing Q = N,N′-diphenyl-o-benzoquinonediimine and donating 2,4-pentanedionate ligands (acac–), π-accepting 2,2/-bipyridine (bpy), or strongly π-accepting 2-phenylazopyridine (pap) were prepared and structurally identified. The electronic structures of the complexes and several accessible oxidized and reduced forms were studied experimentally (electrochemistry, magnetic resonance, ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared (UV-vis-NIR) spectroelectrochemistry) and computationally (DFT/TD-DFT) to reveal significantly variable electron transfer behavior and charge distribution. While the redox system 1 +–1 – prefers trivalent ruthenium with corresponding oxidation states Q0–Q2– of the noninnocent ligand, the series 2 2+–2 0 and 3 2+–3 – retain RuII. The bpy and pap co-ligands are not only spectators but can also be reduced prior to a second reduction of Q. The present study with new experimental and computational evidence on the influence of co-ligands on the metal is complementary to a report on the substituent effects in o-quinonediimine ligands [Kalinina et al., Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10110] and to the discussion of the most appropriate oxidation state formulation RuII(Q0) or RuIII(Q• –).