Loading…
The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence
Generic drugs have been commercialized in numerous countries. Most of these countries approve the commercialization of a generic drug when there is evidence of bioequivalence between the generic drug and the reference drug. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry is responsible for the bioequivalence...
Saved in:
Published in: | Statistics in medicine 2016-07, Vol.35 (15), p.2525-2542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233 |
container_end_page | 2542 |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 2525 |
container_title | Statistics in medicine |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | de Souza, Roberto Molina Achcar, Jorge Alberto Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi Mazucheli, Josmar |
description | Generic drugs have been commercialized in numerous countries. Most of these countries approve the commercialization of a generic drug when there is evidence of bioequivalence between the generic drug and the reference drug. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry is responsible for the bioequivalence test under the supervision of a regulatory agency. This procedure is concluded after a statistical data analysis. Several agencies adopt a standard statistical analysis based on procedures that were previously established. In practice, we face situations in which this standard model does not fit to some sets of bioequivalence data. In this study, we propose an evaluation of bioequivalence using univariate and bivariate models based on an extended generalized gamma distribution and a skew‐t distribution, under a Bayesian perspective. We introduce a study of the empirical power of hypothesis tests for univariate models, showing advantages in the use of an extended generalized gamma distribution. Three sets of bioequivalence data were analyzed under these new procedures and compared with the standard model proposed by the majority of regulatory agencies. In order to verify that the asymmetrical distributions are usually better fitted for the data, when compared with the standard model, model discrimination methods were used, such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and quantile–quantile plots. The research concluded that, in general, the use of the extended generalized gamma distribution may be more appropriate to model bioequivalence data in the original scale. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sim.6885 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793903913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4089492741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWqvgL5ABN25G8-gkk4ULEdsKPhZWLG5CMnOj0XnUpFPtv3cGaxHB1eXC4fBxEDog-IRgTE-DK094miYbqEewFDGmSbqJepgKEXNBkh20G8IrxoQkVGyjHcrTQfvRHjqbvEDUBIhqG-mwLEuYe5dFuQvtNc3c1VWIXBXpBXj9DJFxNbw3bqELqDLYQ1tWFwH2V7ePHoaXk4txfH03uro4v44zlookNtRmBmCQyjQjxKZ5boywlmsBvJ0KhmSQJ0JKYSGhnGKOc8Ep07lmxFLG-uj42zvz9XsDYa5KFzIoCl1B3QRFhGQSM0k69OgP-lo3vmrXdRQXksrfwszXIXiwauZdqf1SEay6pKpNqrqkLXq4EjamhHwN_jRsgfgb-HAFLP8Vqfurm5VwxbeN4XPNa_-muGAiUY-3IzWeToZP-GmgpuwLCfuOiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796792923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>de Souza, Roberto Molina ; Achcar, Jorge Alberto ; Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi ; Mazucheli, Josmar</creator><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Roberto Molina ; Achcar, Jorge Alberto ; Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi ; Mazucheli, Josmar</creatorcontrib><description>Generic drugs have been commercialized in numerous countries. Most of these countries approve the commercialization of a generic drug when there is evidence of bioequivalence between the generic drug and the reference drug. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry is responsible for the bioequivalence test under the supervision of a regulatory agency. This procedure is concluded after a statistical data analysis. Several agencies adopt a standard statistical analysis based on procedures that were previously established. In practice, we face situations in which this standard model does not fit to some sets of bioequivalence data. In this study, we propose an evaluation of bioequivalence using univariate and bivariate models based on an extended generalized gamma distribution and a skew‐t distribution, under a Bayesian perspective. We introduce a study of the empirical power of hypothesis tests for univariate models, showing advantages in the use of an extended generalized gamma distribution. Three sets of bioequivalence data were analyzed under these new procedures and compared with the standard model proposed by the majority of regulatory agencies. In order to verify that the asymmetrical distributions are usually better fitted for the data, when compared with the standard model, model discrimination methods were used, such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and quantile–quantile plots. The research concluded that, in general, the use of the extended generalized gamma distribution may be more appropriate to model bioequivalence data in the original scale. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.6885</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26840012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; average bioequivalence ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian inference ; Commercialization ; copula functions ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Drugs, Generic ; extended generalized gamma distribution ; Generic drugs ; Humans ; multivariate skew-t distribution ; Probability distribution ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical Distributions ; Therapeutic Equivalency</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2016-07, Vol.35 (15), p.2525-2542</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul 10, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26840012$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Roberto Molina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achcar, Jorge Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazucheli, Josmar</creatorcontrib><title>The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>Generic drugs have been commercialized in numerous countries. Most of these countries approve the commercialization of a generic drug when there is evidence of bioequivalence between the generic drug and the reference drug. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry is responsible for the bioequivalence test under the supervision of a regulatory agency. This procedure is concluded after a statistical data analysis. Several agencies adopt a standard statistical analysis based on procedures that were previously established. In practice, we face situations in which this standard model does not fit to some sets of bioequivalence data. In this study, we propose an evaluation of bioequivalence using univariate and bivariate models based on an extended generalized gamma distribution and a skew‐t distribution, under a Bayesian perspective. We introduce a study of the empirical power of hypothesis tests for univariate models, showing advantages in the use of an extended generalized gamma distribution. Three sets of bioequivalence data were analyzed under these new procedures and compared with the standard model proposed by the majority of regulatory agencies. In order to verify that the asymmetrical distributions are usually better fitted for the data, when compared with the standard model, model discrimination methods were used, such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and quantile–quantile plots. The research concluded that, in general, the use of the extended generalized gamma distribution may be more appropriate to model bioequivalence data in the original scale. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>average bioequivalence</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian inference</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>copula functions</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Drugs, Generic</subject><subject>extended generalized gamma distribution</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>multivariate skew-t distribution</subject><subject>Probability distribution</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Distributions</subject><subject>Therapeutic Equivalency</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWqvgL5ABN25G8-gkk4ULEdsKPhZWLG5CMnOj0XnUpFPtv3cGaxHB1eXC4fBxEDog-IRgTE-DK094miYbqEewFDGmSbqJepgKEXNBkh20G8IrxoQkVGyjHcrTQfvRHjqbvEDUBIhqG-mwLEuYe5dFuQvtNc3c1VWIXBXpBXj9DJFxNbw3bqELqDLYQ1tWFwH2V7ePHoaXk4txfH03uro4v44zlookNtRmBmCQyjQjxKZ5boywlmsBvJ0KhmSQJ0JKYSGhnGKOc8Ep07lmxFLG-uj42zvz9XsDYa5KFzIoCl1B3QRFhGQSM0k69OgP-lo3vmrXdRQXksrfwszXIXiwauZdqf1SEay6pKpNqrqkLXq4EjamhHwN_jRsgfgb-HAFLP8Vqfurm5VwxbeN4XPNa_-muGAiUY-3IzWeToZP-GmgpuwLCfuOiw</recordid><startdate>20160710</startdate><enddate>20160710</enddate><creator>de Souza, Roberto Molina</creator><creator>Achcar, Jorge Alberto</creator><creator>Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi</creator><creator>Mazucheli, Josmar</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160710</creationdate><title>The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence</title><author>de Souza, Roberto Molina ; Achcar, Jorge Alberto ; Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi ; Mazucheli, Josmar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>average bioequivalence</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian inference</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>copula functions</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Drugs, Generic</topic><topic>extended generalized gamma distribution</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>multivariate skew-t distribution</topic><topic>Probability distribution</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Distributions</topic><topic>Therapeutic Equivalency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Roberto Molina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achcar, Jorge Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazucheli, Josmar</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Souza, Roberto Molina</au><au>Achcar, Jorge Alberto</au><au>Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi</au><au>Mazucheli, Josmar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2016-07-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>2525</spage><epage>2542</epage><pages>2525-2542</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>Generic drugs have been commercialized in numerous countries. Most of these countries approve the commercialization of a generic drug when there is evidence of bioequivalence between the generic drug and the reference drug. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry is responsible for the bioequivalence test under the supervision of a regulatory agency. This procedure is concluded after a statistical data analysis. Several agencies adopt a standard statistical analysis based on procedures that were previously established. In practice, we face situations in which this standard model does not fit to some sets of bioequivalence data. In this study, we propose an evaluation of bioequivalence using univariate and bivariate models based on an extended generalized gamma distribution and a skew‐t distribution, under a Bayesian perspective. We introduce a study of the empirical power of hypothesis tests for univariate models, showing advantages in the use of an extended generalized gamma distribution. Three sets of bioequivalence data were analyzed under these new procedures and compared with the standard model proposed by the majority of regulatory agencies. In order to verify that the asymmetrical distributions are usually better fitted for the data, when compared with the standard model, model discrimination methods were used, such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and quantile–quantile plots. The research concluded that, in general, the use of the extended generalized gamma distribution may be more appropriate to model bioequivalence data in the original scale. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26840012</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.6885</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-6715 |
ispartof | Statistics in medicine, 2016-07, Vol.35 (15), p.2525-2542 |
issn | 0277-6715 1097-0258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793903913 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Asymmetry average bioequivalence Bayes Theorem Bayesian inference Commercialization copula functions Data Interpretation, Statistical Drugs, Generic extended generalized gamma distribution Generic drugs Humans multivariate skew-t distribution Probability distribution Statistical analysis Statistical Distributions Therapeutic Equivalency |
title | The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A19%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20asymmetric%20distributions%20in%20average%20bioequivalence&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=de%20Souza,%20Roberto%20Molina&rft.date=2016-07-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=2525&rft.epage=2542&rft.pages=2525-2542&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.6885&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4089492741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-b2fcbee4898c11f8ddbb7ff6a7e6025eb1ced57997fe5262060d7623ada31f233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796792923&rft_id=info:pmid/26840012&rfr_iscdi=true |