Loading…

Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children

Across a series of four experiments with 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms supporting noun learning extend to the mapping of actions to objects. In Experiment 1 (n = 61) the demonstration of a novel action led children to select a novel, rather than a familiar object. In Expe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive science 2016-05, Vol.40 (4), p.992-1006
Main Authors: Riggs, Kevin J., Mather, Emily, Hyde, Grace, Simpson, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3
container_end_page 1006
container_issue 4
container_start_page 992
container_title Cognitive science
container_volume 40
creator Riggs, Kevin J.
Mather, Emily
Hyde, Grace
Simpson, Andrew
description Across a series of four experiments with 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms supporting noun learning extend to the mapping of actions to objects. In Experiment 1 (n = 61) the demonstration of a novel action led children to select a novel, rather than a familiar object. In Experiment 2 (n = 78) children exhibited long‐term retention of novel action‐object mappings and extended these actions to other category members. In Experiment 3 (n = 60) we showed that children formed an accurate sensorimotor record of the novel action. In Experiment 4 (n = 54) we demonstrate limits on the types of actions mapped to novel objects. Overall these data suggest that certain aspects of noun mapping share common processing with action mapping and support a domain‐general account of word learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cogs.12262
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794492023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1101286</ericid><sourcerecordid>4059973361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKJDEUhoOMaHvZuHcocCNCaU5SSSpLbbzi0ILKMKsinZxyqqmuapMuxJ2P4DP6JKYtdaEwTDYJfF_-Q_ITsgV0H-I6sO1d2AfGJFsiAxACUqmo_kEGlMsspQz4KlkLYUIplZLrFbLKJADVig7I7ZXxpq6xDskRzh8Qm-TQzqu2eXl6Ho0naOfJLzObVc1dYhqX_G69-06qJvnTdvEw_FvVzmOzQZZLUwfcfN_Xye3J8c3wLL0cnZ4PDy9Tm2U5Sw0IhyWMrbBZzrlFwTgrDYVS5UogjEvBMwClmaAShBaalo461Io5p5nl62S3z5359r7DMC-mVbBY16bBtgtFvJplmlHG_0elmVDxP6O680WdtJ1v4kOilWuplOaLwL3esr4NwWNZzHw1Nf6xAFoseikWvRRvvUT553tkN56i-1Q_iojCdi-gr-wnPr6IGFguI4eeP1Q1Pv5jVDEcnV73Q18BfmygqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789677933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Riggs, Kevin J. ; Mather, Emily ; Hyde, Grace ; Simpson, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Kevin J. ; Mather, Emily ; Hyde, Grace ; Simpson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Across a series of four experiments with 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms supporting noun learning extend to the mapping of actions to objects. In Experiment 1 (n = 61) the demonstration of a novel action led children to select a novel, rather than a familiar object. In Experiment 2 (n = 78) children exhibited long‐term retention of novel action‐object mappings and extended these actions to other category members. In Experiment 3 (n = 60) we showed that children formed an accurate sensorimotor record of the novel action. In Experiment 4 (n = 54) we demonstrate limits on the types of actions mapped to novel objects. Overall these data suggest that certain aspects of noun mapping share common processing with action mapping and support a domain‐general account of word learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-0213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26110970</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COGSD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Actions ; Child psychology ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive Mapping ; Cognitive psychology ; Comparative Analysis ; England ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Familiarity ; Fast mapping ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Language Development ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; Nouns ; Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) ; Perceptual Motor Learning ; Preschool Children ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Word learning ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Cognitive science, 2016-05, Vol.40 (4), p.992-1006</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1101286$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mather, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children</title><title>Cognitive science</title><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Across a series of four experiments with 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms supporting noun learning extend to the mapping of actions to objects. In Experiment 1 (n = 61) the demonstration of a novel action led children to select a novel, rather than a familiar object. In Experiment 2 (n = 78) children exhibited long‐term retention of novel action‐object mappings and extended these actions to other category members. In Experiment 3 (n = 60) we showed that children formed an accurate sensorimotor record of the novel action. In Experiment 4 (n = 54) we demonstrate limits on the types of actions mapped to novel objects. Overall these data suggest that certain aspects of noun mapping share common processing with action mapping and support a domain‐general account of word learning.</description><subject>Actions</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Mapping</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Fast mapping</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</subject><subject>Perceptual Motor Learning</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Word learning</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0364-0213</issn><issn>1551-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKJDEUhoOMaHvZuHcocCNCaU5SSSpLbbzi0ILKMKsinZxyqqmuapMuxJ2P4DP6JKYtdaEwTDYJfF_-Q_ITsgV0H-I6sO1d2AfGJFsiAxACUqmo_kEGlMsspQz4KlkLYUIplZLrFbLKJADVig7I7ZXxpq6xDskRzh8Qm-TQzqu2eXl6Ho0naOfJLzObVc1dYhqX_G69-06qJvnTdvEw_FvVzmOzQZZLUwfcfN_Xye3J8c3wLL0cnZ4PDy9Tm2U5Sw0IhyWMrbBZzrlFwTgrDYVS5UogjEvBMwClmaAShBaalo461Io5p5nl62S3z5359r7DMC-mVbBY16bBtgtFvJplmlHG_0elmVDxP6O680WdtJ1v4kOilWuplOaLwL3esr4NwWNZzHw1Nf6xAFoseikWvRRvvUT553tkN56i-1Q_iojCdi-gr-wnPr6IGFguI4eeP1Q1Pv5jVDEcnV73Q18BfmygqQ</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Riggs, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Mather, Emily</creator><creator>Hyde, Grace</creator><creator>Simpson, Andrew</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children</title><author>Riggs, Kevin J. ; Mather, Emily ; Hyde, Grace ; Simpson, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actions</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Mapping</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Fast mapping</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</topic><topic>Perceptual Motor Learning</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Word learning</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mather, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riggs, Kevin J.</au><au>Mather, Emily</au><au>Hyde, Grace</au><au>Simpson, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1101286</ericid><atitle>Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>1006</epage><pages>992-1006</pages><issn>0364-0213</issn><eissn>1551-6709</eissn><coden>COGSD5</coden><abstract>Across a series of four experiments with 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms supporting noun learning extend to the mapping of actions to objects. In Experiment 1 (n = 61) the demonstration of a novel action led children to select a novel, rather than a familiar object. In Experiment 2 (n = 78) children exhibited long‐term retention of novel action‐object mappings and extended these actions to other category members. In Experiment 3 (n = 60) we showed that children formed an accurate sensorimotor record of the novel action. In Experiment 4 (n = 54) we demonstrate limits on the types of actions mapped to novel objects. Overall these data suggest that certain aspects of noun mapping share common processing with action mapping and support a domain‐general account of word learning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>26110970</pmid><doi>10.1111/cogs.12262</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-0213
ispartof Cognitive science, 2016-05, Vol.40 (4), p.992-1006
issn 0364-0213
1551-6709
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794492023
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Actions
Child psychology
Child, Preschool
Cognition - physiology
Cognitive Mapping
Cognitive psychology
Comparative Analysis
England
Experimental psychology
Experiments
Familiarity
Fast mapping
Female
Humans
Language
Language Development
Learning - physiology
Male
Nouns
Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Perceptual Motor Learning
Preschool Children
Vocabulary
Vocabulary Development
Word learning
Young Children
title Parallels Between Action‐Object Mapping and Word‐Object Mapping in Young Children
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallels%20Between%20Action%E2%80%90Object%20Mapping%20and%20Word%E2%80%90Object%20Mapping%20in%20Young%20Children&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20science&rft.au=Riggs,%20Kevin%20J.&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1006&rft.pages=992-1006&rft.issn=0364-0213&rft.eissn=1551-6709&rft.coden=COGSD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cogs.12262&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4059973361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a15def1bc5c4833ce5232fa01f7875e1bf53411792506159590fd0de972dd92c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789677933&rft_id=info:pmid/26110970&rft_ericid=EJ1101286&rfr_iscdi=true