Loading…

Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2015-07, Vol.165 (1-4), p.194-198
Main Authors: Manssor, E, Abuderman, A, Osman, S, Alenezi, S B, Almehemeid, S, Babikir, E, Alkhorayef, M, Sulieman, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3
container_end_page 198
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 194
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 165
creator Manssor, E
Abuderman, A
Osman, S
Alenezi, S B
Almehemeid, S
Babikir, E
Alkhorayef, M
Sulieman, A
description Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The objectives of this study are to estimate radiation doses during chest, abdomen and pelvis CT. A total of 51 patients were examined for the evaluation of metastasis of a diagnosed primary tumour during 4 months. A calibrated CT machine from Siemens 64 slice was used. The mean age was 48.0 ± 18.6 y. The mean patient weight was 73.8 ± 16.1 kg. The mean dose-length product was 1493.8 ± 392.1 mGy cm, Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) was 22.94 ± 5.64 mGy and the mean effective dose was 22.4 ± 5.9 mSv per procedure. The radiation dose per procedure was higher as compared with previous studies. Therefore, the optimisation of patient's radiation doses is required in order to reduce the radiation risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncv107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794500595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1794500595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkElLA0EYRBtRTIxe_AHSRxHHfL13e5PgBgFB4rnpLTgym9OZgP_ekUSvnuryqCoeQucEbggYNu-7OG_CloA6QFOiOC0YB3mIpkA4LzSnMEEnOX8AUGUEP0YTKrSgRJMpun11sXSbsm1wbHPKuGxweE95c42dj22dGuyaiLtUbcuMFyvc9W1IcehTPkVHa1fldLbPGXp7uF8tnorly-Pz4m5ZBEZhUxCiI42Os-gk12smI0_GeMK4UMYLp3VQUgrNqPLgNUuSKy2C94pLEMqzGbrc9Y7Tn8N4zdZlDqmqXJPaIVuiDBcAwoj_UWmk1IRyPaJXOzT0bc59WtuuL2vXf1kC9kerHbXandYRvtj3Dr5O8Q_99ci-ATd7cVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696681248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Manssor, E ; Abuderman, A ; Osman, S ; Alenezi, S B ; Almehemeid, S ; Babikir, E ; Alkhorayef, M ; Sulieman, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Manssor, E ; Abuderman, A ; Osman, S ; Alenezi, S B ; Almehemeid, S ; Babikir, E ; Alkhorayef, M ; Sulieman, A</creatorcontrib><description>Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The objectives of this study are to estimate radiation doses during chest, abdomen and pelvis CT. A total of 51 patients were examined for the evaluation of metastasis of a diagnosed primary tumour during 4 months. A calibrated CT machine from Siemens 64 slice was used. The mean age was 48.0 ± 18.6 y. The mean patient weight was 73.8 ± 16.1 kg. The mean dose-length product was 1493.8 ± 392.1 mGy cm, Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) was 22.94 ± 5.64 mGy and the mean effective dose was 22.4 ± 5.9 mSv per procedure. The radiation dose per procedure was higher as compared with previous studies. Therefore, the optimisation of patient's radiation doses is required in order to reduce the radiation risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25852181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Calibration ; Contrast Media ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - prevention &amp; control ; Pelvis - diagnostic imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography, Abdominal - methods ; Radiography, Thoracic - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; X-Rays ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2015-07, Vol.165 (1-4), p.194-198</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manssor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuderman, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alenezi, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almehemeid, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The objectives of this study are to estimate radiation doses during chest, abdomen and pelvis CT. A total of 51 patients were examined for the evaluation of metastasis of a diagnosed primary tumour during 4 months. A calibrated CT machine from Siemens 64 slice was used. The mean age was 48.0 ± 18.6 y. The mean patient weight was 73.8 ± 16.1 kg. The mean dose-length product was 1493.8 ± 392.1 mGy cm, Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) was 22.94 ± 5.64 mGy and the mean effective dose was 22.4 ± 5.9 mSv per procedure. The radiation dose per procedure was higher as compared with previous studies. Therefore, the optimisation of patient's radiation doses is required in order to reduce the radiation risk.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkElLA0EYRBtRTIxe_AHSRxHHfL13e5PgBgFB4rnpLTgym9OZgP_ekUSvnuryqCoeQucEbggYNu-7OG_CloA6QFOiOC0YB3mIpkA4LzSnMEEnOX8AUGUEP0YTKrSgRJMpun11sXSbsm1wbHPKuGxweE95c42dj22dGuyaiLtUbcuMFyvc9W1IcehTPkVHa1fldLbPGXp7uF8tnorly-Pz4m5ZBEZhUxCiI42Os-gk12smI0_GeMK4UMYLp3VQUgrNqPLgNUuSKy2C94pLEMqzGbrc9Y7Tn8N4zdZlDqmqXJPaIVuiDBcAwoj_UWmk1IRyPaJXOzT0bc59WtuuL2vXf1kC9kerHbXandYRvtj3Dr5O8Q_99ci-ATd7cVg</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Manssor, E</creator><creator>Abuderman, A</creator><creator>Osman, S</creator><creator>Alenezi, S B</creator><creator>Almehemeid, S</creator><creator>Babikir, E</creator><creator>Alkhorayef, M</creator><creator>Sulieman, A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures</title><author>Manssor, E ; Abuderman, A ; Osman, S ; Alenezi, S B ; Almehemeid, S ; Babikir, E ; Alkhorayef, M ; Sulieman, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manssor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuderman, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alenezi, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almehemeid, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manssor, E</au><au>Abuderman, A</au><au>Osman, S</au><au>Alenezi, S B</au><au>Almehemeid, S</au><au>Babikir, E</au><au>Alkhorayef, M</au><au>Sulieman, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>194-198</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The objectives of this study are to estimate radiation doses during chest, abdomen and pelvis CT. A total of 51 patients were examined for the evaluation of metastasis of a diagnosed primary tumour during 4 months. A calibrated CT machine from Siemens 64 slice was used. The mean age was 48.0 ± 18.6 y. The mean patient weight was 73.8 ± 16.1 kg. The mean dose-length product was 1493.8 ± 392.1 mGy cm, Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) was 22.94 ± 5.64 mGy and the mean effective dose was 22.4 ± 5.9 mSv per procedure. The radiation dose per procedure was higher as compared with previous studies. Therefore, the optimisation of patient's radiation doses is required in order to reduce the radiation risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25852181</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncv107</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2015-07, Vol.165 (1-4), p.194-198
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794500595
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Calibration
Contrast Media
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms - pathology
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - prevention & control
Pelvis - diagnostic imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Abdominal - methods
Radiography, Thoracic - methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
X-Rays
Young Adult
title Radiation doses in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT procedures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A26%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20doses%20in%20chest,%20abdomen%20and%20pelvis%20CT%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Manssor,%20E&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=194-198&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncv107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1794500595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-118d2da43da648f36d4e99b134579b5a88c76658327b0b83e64785cbb746057b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696681248&rft_id=info:pmid/25852181&rfr_iscdi=true