QUALITY OF LIFE OF KIDNEY DONORS RESIDING IN KATHMANDU VALLEY

SUMMARY Background Transplantation is evolving as an efficient treatment modality in Nepal for the rising cases of kidney failure. As living donors are healthy people donating their organ for the benefit of the recipient, it is imperative to ensure their safety. Objectives To assess the quality of l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of renal care 2016-06, Vol.42 (2), p.115-122
Main Authors: Shakya, Dayana, K.C., Takma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Chronic kidney disease
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Haemodialysis
Humans
Kidney Transplantation - psychology
Male
Mental health
Middle Aged
Nepal
Nursing
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Psychometrics - methods
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Tissue Donors - psychology
Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data
Transplantation
Transplants & implants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:SUMMARY Background Transplantation is evolving as an efficient treatment modality in Nepal for the rising cases of kidney failure. As living donors are healthy people donating their organ for the benefit of the recipient, it is imperative to ensure their safety. Objectives To assess the quality of life (QOL) of kidney donors and to compare it with healthy references. Methodology Cross‐sectional, comparative design was used to find out the QOL of 59 donors and 59 healthy references. Convenience sampling was used to approach donors and eligible donors were interviewed at their residences. These were compared with age‐ and sex‐matched references. QOL was assessed using SF36v2. Result Male, educated and employed donors were found to have better QOL than their counterparts. The comparison of donors and references showed better scores in the donors’ QOL with significant differences in general health, mental health and mental component score. Conclusion This study concludes that living kidney donation does not impair the QOL of the donors but in turn may improve their mental health. Hence, this study supports the practice of living‐related kidney transplantation. Implications Besides providing baseline data about donors in Nepal, this study may guide health professionals in counselling potential donors and assisting patients and their families to make informed decisions regarding transplant. It can assist health care planners in making policies concerning transplant.
ISSN:1755-6678
1755-6686
DOI:10.1111/jorc.12151