Loading…
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy
The legitimization of paltry favors compliance-gaining technique involves a phrase that validates a very small amount of requested aid. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the legitimization of paltry favors technique on the compliance rate, mean contribution...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological reports 2016-06, Vol.118 (3), p.748-771 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3 |
container_end_page | 771 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 748 |
container_title | Psychological reports |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Lee, Seyoung Moon, Shin-Il Feeley, Thomas Hugh |
description | The legitimization of paltry favors compliance-gaining technique involves a phrase that validates a very small amount of requested aid. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the legitimization of paltry favors technique on the compliance rate, mean contribution amount per contributor, and total contribution amount. Results indicated that the legitimization of paltry favors technique significantly increased the compliance rate relative to a direct request control without markedly diminishing the mean contribution amount per contributor. In terms of total contribution amount, the legitimization of paltry favors technique was more successful than controls. Moderator analyses showed none of 14 identified moderators explained the relationship between technique use and compliance rate. Three variables (target request, time interval, and country), however, moderated the relationship between technique use and the mean contribution per contributor. Theoretical and practical implications for legitimization of paltry favors-based research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0033294116647690 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795877613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0033294116647690</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1795877613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMLAE7TnLxWFUUkIr4ltgi1z0XV_kotlMUfj2JWhiQmE5373Pv8BByyugFYwCXlHIeiZixNI0hFXSPDFmSZGEq2Ns-GfZx2OcDcuTcqlsZ5XBIBhEw4FlCh-RxHNyhl-G4kkXrjQqecGPwM6h14N8xmOHSeFOaL-lNXfXXB1l42wZTuamtCyZ1uS6MrBQGz95Kj8v2mBxoWTg82c0ReZ1evUxuwtn99e1kPAsV5-BDRjFT8xi4hnmiZRRLgAxYFKcKYhUjAtURFzyCKNY8U0rQSAvBF8i5oCnyETnf9q5t_dGg83lpnMKikBXWjcsZiCQDSBnvULpFla2ds6jztTWltG3OaN6LzP-K7F7Odu3NvMTF78OPuQ4It4CTS8xXdWM7g-7_wm9hN3lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795877613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Lee, Seyoung ; Moon, Shin-Il ; Feeley, Thomas Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seyoung ; Moon, Shin-Il ; Feeley, Thomas Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>The legitimization of paltry favors compliance-gaining technique involves a phrase that validates a very small amount of requested aid. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the legitimization of paltry favors technique on the compliance rate, mean contribution amount per contributor, and total contribution amount. Results indicated that the legitimization of paltry favors technique significantly increased the compliance rate relative to a direct request control without markedly diminishing the mean contribution amount per contributor. In terms of total contribution amount, the legitimization of paltry favors technique was more successful than controls. Moderator analyses showed none of 14 identified moderators explained the relationship between technique use and compliance rate. Three variables (target request, time interval, and country), however, moderated the relationship between technique use and the mean contribution per contributor. Theoretical and practical implications for legitimization of paltry favors-based research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0033294116647690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27173850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Helping Behavior ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2016-06, Vol.118 (3), p.748-771</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27173850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Shin-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feeley, Thomas Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>The legitimization of paltry favors compliance-gaining technique involves a phrase that validates a very small amount of requested aid. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the legitimization of paltry favors technique on the compliance rate, mean contribution amount per contributor, and total contribution amount. Results indicated that the legitimization of paltry favors technique significantly increased the compliance rate relative to a direct request control without markedly diminishing the mean contribution amount per contributor. In terms of total contribution amount, the legitimization of paltry favors technique was more successful than controls. Moderator analyses showed none of 14 identified moderators explained the relationship between technique use and compliance rate. Three variables (target request, time interval, and country), however, moderated the relationship between technique use and the mean contribution per contributor. Theoretical and practical implications for legitimization of paltry favors-based research are discussed.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Helping Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMLAE7TnLxWFUUkIr4ltgi1z0XV_kotlMUfj2JWhiQmE5373Pv8BByyugFYwCXlHIeiZixNI0hFXSPDFmSZGEq2Ns-GfZx2OcDcuTcqlsZ5XBIBhEw4FlCh-RxHNyhl-G4kkXrjQqecGPwM6h14N8xmOHSeFOaL-lNXfXXB1l42wZTuamtCyZ1uS6MrBQGz95Kj8v2mBxoWTg82c0ReZ1evUxuwtn99e1kPAsV5-BDRjFT8xi4hnmiZRRLgAxYFKcKYhUjAtURFzyCKNY8U0rQSAvBF8i5oCnyETnf9q5t_dGg83lpnMKikBXWjcsZiCQDSBnvULpFla2ds6jztTWltG3OaN6LzP-K7F7Odu3NvMTF78OPuQ4It4CTS8xXdWM7g-7_wm9hN3lA</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Lee, Seyoung</creator><creator>Moon, Shin-Il</creator><creator>Feeley, Thomas Hugh</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy</title><author>Lee, Seyoung ; Moon, Shin-Il ; Feeley, Thomas Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Helping Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Shin-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feeley, Thomas Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Seyoung</au><au>Moon, Shin-Il</au><au>Feeley, Thomas Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>748-771</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>The legitimization of paltry favors compliance-gaining technique involves a phrase that validates a very small amount of requested aid. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the legitimization of paltry favors technique on the compliance rate, mean contribution amount per contributor, and total contribution amount. Results indicated that the legitimization of paltry favors technique significantly increased the compliance rate relative to a direct request control without markedly diminishing the mean contribution amount per contributor. In terms of total contribution amount, the legitimization of paltry favors technique was more successful than controls. Moderator analyses showed none of 14 identified moderators explained the relationship between technique use and compliance rate. Three variables (target request, time interval, and country), however, moderated the relationship between technique use and the mean contribution per contributor. Theoretical and practical implications for legitimization of paltry favors-based research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27173850</pmid><doi>10.1177/0033294116647690</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2941 |
ispartof | Psychological reports, 2016-06, Vol.118 (3), p.748-771 |
issn | 0033-2941 1558-691X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795877613 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; SAGE |
subjects | Altruism Helping Behavior Humans |
title | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Legitimization of Paltry Favors Compliance Strategy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T23%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analytic%20Review%20of%20the%20Legitimization%20of%20Paltry%20Favors%20Compliance%20Strategy&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Lee,%20Seyoung&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=748-771&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0033294116647690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1795877613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-10e8cb473f7b5fa24a77871246c74c4ee70f23932724f38cc902f993de33906e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795877613&rft_id=info:pmid/27173850&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0033294116647690&rfr_iscdi=true |