Loading…

Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata

To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological research 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329
Main Authors: HATTORI, Kouhei, ISHIDA, Takahide A., MIKI, Kaori, SUZUKI, Mayuko, KIMURA, Masahito T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.
ISSN:0912-3814
1440-1703
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x