Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart: An electrocardiographic and echocardiographic approach

• Published in: Journal of electrocardiology 2016-07, Vol.49 (4), p.539-544
• Main Authors: Grazioli, Gonzalo, MD, Usín, Domingo, MD, Trucco, Emilce, MD, Sanz, Maria, MD, Montserrat, Silvia, MD, PhD, Vidal, Bàrbara, MD, PhD, Gutierrez, Josep, MD, Canal, Ramon, MD, Brugada, Josep, MD, PhD, Mont, Lluis, MD, PhD, Sitges, Marta, MD, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Athlete's heart; Cardiomegaly - diagnosis; Cardiomegaly, Exercise-Induced; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic - diagnosis; Cardiovascular; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods; Diagnosis, Differential; Echocardiography; Echocardiography - methods; Electrocardiography - methods; Humans; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Male; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spatial QRS-T angle; Sports - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0022-0736; 1532-8430
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.03.005

Abstract Differential diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) vs athlete's heart is challenging in individuals with mild–moderate left-ventricular hypertrophy. This study aimed to assess ECG and echocardiographic parameters proposed for the differential diagnosis of HCM. The study included 75 men in three groups: control (n = 30), “gray zone” athletes with interventricular septum (IVS) measuring 13–15 mm (n = 25) and HCM patients with IVS of 13–18 mm (n = 20). The most significant differences were found in relative septal thickness (RST), calculated as the ratio of 2 x IVS to left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LV-EDD) (0.37, 0.51, 0.71, respectively; p < 0.01) and in spatial QRS-T angle as visually estimated (9.8, 33.6, 66.2, respectively; p < 0.01). The capacity for differential HCM diagnosis of each of the 5 criteria was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), as follows: LV-EDD < 54 (0.60), family history (0.61), T-wave inversion (TWI) (0.67), spatial QRS-T angle > 45 (0.75) and RST > 0.54 (0.92). Pearson correlation between spatial QRS-T angle > 45 and TWI was 0.76 (p 0.01). The combination of spatial QRS-T angle > 45 and RST > 0.54 for diagnosis of HCM had an AUC of 0.79. The best diagnostic criteria for HCM was RST > 0.54. The spatial QRS-T angle > 45 did not add sensitivity if TWI was present. No additional improvement in differential diagnosis was obtained by combining parameters.