Loading…
Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions
The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. General 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 829 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 807 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. General |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Schrift, Rom Y. Kivetz, Ran Netzer, Oded |
description | The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xge0000171 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800402311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800402311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8gBTciVnNr07iTcbyA4EZxI4Q0c6LVTlOTFPTtTRkv4MKzSAL5-An5Edol-JhgJk7enwCnIYKsoAmRTOY0zSqaYCzLnHFebKDNEF5GxKpyHW1QQSgrhJigx6lb9G1jdGy6p-wcTBMa14XT7O4ZsgfnX7NZfG5MdgWDb0JMJ93Ns5gup4lFP5iYfOZsNrPW-WiH9jdlG61Z3QbY-dq30P3F7G56ld_cXl5Pz25yzUkZc17NpYaSyUrXJcXYMku5kVBjCsLquqhMCTQJzkGaAgprCllXxOhaYLCGbaGDZW7v3dsAIapFEwy0re7ADUGRCmOOKSMk0f0_9MUNvkuvGxXlXKb1XyUqLgpKxagOl8p4F4IHq3rfLLT_UASrsRn120zCe1-RQ72A-Q_9riKBoyXQvVZ9-DDap-9uIZjBe-jiGKYIL5RQFRbsE7bYmBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784752272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xge0000171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27123577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPGEDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Behavioral decision theory ; Career Mobility ; Choice Behavior ; Conflict ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Culture ; Decision Making ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Heuristic ; Heuristics ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Motivation ; Perceptual Distortion ; Preferences ; Recall ; Thinking ; Work (Attitudes Toward) ; Work ethic ; Work Performance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivetz, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzer, Oded</creatorcontrib><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Career Mobility</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptual Distortion</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><subject>Work (Attitudes Toward)</subject><subject>Work ethic</subject><subject>Work Performance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8gBTciVnNr07iTcbyA4EZxI4Q0c6LVTlOTFPTtTRkv4MKzSAL5-An5Edol-JhgJk7enwCnIYKsoAmRTOY0zSqaYCzLnHFebKDNEF5GxKpyHW1QQSgrhJigx6lb9G1jdGy6p-wcTBMa14XT7O4ZsgfnX7NZfG5MdgWDb0JMJ93Ns5gup4lFP5iYfOZsNrPW-WiH9jdlG61Z3QbY-dq30P3F7G56ld_cXl5Pz25yzUkZc17NpYaSyUrXJcXYMku5kVBjCsLquqhMCTQJzkGaAgprCllXxOhaYLCGbaGDZW7v3dsAIapFEwy0re7ADUGRCmOOKSMk0f0_9MUNvkuvGxXlXKb1XyUqLgpKxagOl8p4F4IHq3rfLLT_UASrsRn120zCe1-RQ72A-Q_9riKBoyXQvVZ9-DDap-9uIZjBe-jiGKYIL5RQFRbsE7bYmBc</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Schrift, Rom Y.</creator><creator>Kivetz, Ran</creator><creator>Netzer, Oded</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><author>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Career Mobility</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptual Distortion</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><topic>Work (Attitudes Toward)</topic><topic>Work ethic</topic><topic>Work Performance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivetz, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzer, Oded</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrift, Rom Y.</au><au>Kivetz, Ran</au><au>Netzer, Oded</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>829</epage><pages>807-829</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><coden>JPGEDD</coden><abstract>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>27123577</pmid><doi>10.1037/xge0000171</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-3445 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829 |
issn | 0096-3445 1939-2222 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800402311 |
source | PsycArticles (EBSCO) |
subjects | Achievement Behavioral decision theory Career Mobility Choice Behavior Conflict Conflict (Psychology) Culture Decision Making Experimental psychology Female Heuristic Heuristics Human Humans Information processing Male Memory Mental Recall Motivation Perceptual Distortion Preferences Recall Thinking Work (Attitudes Toward) Work ethic Work Performance Young Adult |
title | Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complicating%20Decisions:%20The%20Work%20Ethic%20Heuristic%20and%20the%20Construction%20of%20Effortful%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Schrift,%20Rom%20Y.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=829&rft.pages=807-829&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft.coden=JPGEDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xge0000171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800402311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784752272&rft_id=info:pmid/27123577&rfr_iscdi=true |