Loading…

Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions

The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. General 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829
Main Authors: Schrift, Rom Y., Kivetz, Ran, Netzer, Oded
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3
cites
container_end_page 829
container_issue 7
container_start_page 807
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. General
container_volume 145
creator Schrift, Rom Y.
Kivetz, Ran
Netzer, Oded
description The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xge0000171
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800402311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800402311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8gBTciVnNr07iTcbyA4EZxI4Q0c6LVTlOTFPTtTRkv4MKzSAL5-An5Edol-JhgJk7enwCnIYKsoAmRTOY0zSqaYCzLnHFebKDNEF5GxKpyHW1QQSgrhJigx6lb9G1jdGy6p-wcTBMa14XT7O4ZsgfnX7NZfG5MdgWDb0JMJ93Ns5gup4lFP5iYfOZsNrPW-WiH9jdlG61Z3QbY-dq30P3F7G56ld_cXl5Pz25yzUkZc17NpYaSyUrXJcXYMku5kVBjCsLquqhMCTQJzkGaAgprCllXxOhaYLCGbaGDZW7v3dsAIapFEwy0re7ADUGRCmOOKSMk0f0_9MUNvkuvGxXlXKb1XyUqLgpKxagOl8p4F4IHq3rfLLT_UASrsRn120zCe1-RQ72A-Q_9riKBoyXQvVZ9-DDap-9uIZjBe-jiGKYIL5RQFRbsE7bYmBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784752272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xge0000171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27123577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPGEDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Behavioral decision theory ; Career Mobility ; Choice Behavior ; Conflict ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Culture ; Decision Making ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Heuristic ; Heuristics ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Motivation ; Perceptual Distortion ; Preferences ; Recall ; Thinking ; Work (Attitudes Toward) ; Work ethic ; Work Performance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivetz, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzer, Oded</creatorcontrib><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Career Mobility</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptual Distortion</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><subject>Work (Attitudes Toward)</subject><subject>Work ethic</subject><subject>Work Performance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8gBTciVnNr07iTcbyA4EZxI4Q0c6LVTlOTFPTtTRkv4MKzSAL5-An5Edol-JhgJk7enwCnIYKsoAmRTOY0zSqaYCzLnHFebKDNEF5GxKpyHW1QQSgrhJigx6lb9G1jdGy6p-wcTBMa14XT7O4ZsgfnX7NZfG5MdgWDb0JMJ93Ns5gup4lFP5iYfOZsNrPW-WiH9jdlG61Z3QbY-dq30P3F7G56ld_cXl5Pz25yzUkZc17NpYaSyUrXJcXYMku5kVBjCsLquqhMCTQJzkGaAgprCllXxOhaYLCGbaGDZW7v3dsAIapFEwy0re7ADUGRCmOOKSMk0f0_9MUNvkuvGxXlXKb1XyUqLgpKxagOl8p4F4IHq3rfLLT_UASrsRn120zCe1-RQ72A-Q_9riKBoyXQvVZ9-DDap-9uIZjBe-jiGKYIL5RQFRbsE7bYmBc</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Schrift, Rom Y.</creator><creator>Kivetz, Ran</creator><creator>Netzer, Oded</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</title><author>Schrift, Rom Y. ; Kivetz, Ran ; Netzer, Oded</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Career Mobility</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptual Distortion</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><topic>Work (Attitudes Toward)</topic><topic>Work ethic</topic><topic>Work Performance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrift, Rom Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivetz, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzer, Oded</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrift, Rom Y.</au><au>Kivetz, Ran</au><au>Netzer, Oded</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>829</epage><pages>807-829</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><coden>JPGEDD</coden><abstract>The notion that effort and hard work yield desired outcomes is ingrained in many cultures and affects our thinking and behavior. However, could valuing effort complicate our lives? In the present article, the authors demonstrate that individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes end up complicating what should be easy decisions. People distort their preferences and the information they search and recall in a manner that intensifies the choice conflict and decisional effort they experience before finalizing their choice. Six experiments identify the effort-outcome link as the underlying mechanism for such conflict-increasing behavior. Individuals with a stronger tendency to link effort with positive outcomes (e.g., individuals who subscribe to a Protestant Work Ethic) are shown to complicate decisions by: (a) distorting evaluations of alternatives (Study 1); (b) distorting information recalled about the alternatives (Studies 2a and 2b); and (3) distorting interpretations of information about the alternatives (Study 3). Further, individuals conduct a superfluous search for information and spend more time than needed on what should have been an easy decision (Studies 4a and 4b).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>27123577</pmid><doi>10.1037/xge0000171</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-3445
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2016-07, Vol.145 (7), p.807-829
issn 0096-3445
1939-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800402311
source PsycArticles (EBSCO)
subjects Achievement
Behavioral decision theory
Career Mobility
Choice Behavior
Conflict
Conflict (Psychology)
Culture
Decision Making
Experimental psychology
Female
Heuristic
Heuristics
Human
Humans
Information processing
Male
Memory
Mental Recall
Motivation
Perceptual Distortion
Preferences
Recall
Thinking
Work (Attitudes Toward)
Work ethic
Work Performance
Young Adult
title Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complicating%20Decisions:%20The%20Work%20Ethic%20Heuristic%20and%20the%20Construction%20of%20Effortful%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Schrift,%20Rom%20Y.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=829&rft.pages=807-829&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft.coden=JPGEDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xge0000171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800402311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-48d9ae6398ab6200f3f24c9eb02e7fab58c6e2ae644e9c5e5fc59b81cab70efc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784752272&rft_id=info:pmid/27123577&rfr_iscdi=true