Loading…
Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics
It is widely accepted that translational research practitioners need to acquire special skills and knowledge that will enable them to anticipate, analyze, and manage a range of ethical issues. While there is a small but growing literature that addresses the ethics of translational research, there is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science and engineering ethics 2015-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1019-1031 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13 |
container_end_page | 1031 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1019 |
container_title | Science and engineering ethics |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Sunderland, Mary E. Nayak, Rahul Uday |
description | It is widely accepted that translational research practitioners need to acquire special skills and knowledge that will enable them to anticipate, analyze, and manage a range of ethical issues. While there is a small but growing literature that addresses the ethics of translational research, there is a dearth of scholarship regarding how this might apply to engineers. In this paper we examine engineers as key translators and argue that they are well positioned to ask transformative ethical questions. Asking engineers to both broaden and deepen their consideration of ethics in their work, however, requires a shift in the way ethics is often portrayed and perceived in science and engineering communities. Rather than interpreting ethics as a roadblock to the success of translational research, we suggest that engineers should be encouraged to ask questions about the socio-ethical dimensions of their work. This requires expanding the conceptual framework of engineering beyond its traditional focus on “how” and “what” questions to also include “why” and “who” questions to facilitate the gathering of normative, socially-situated information. Empowering engineers to ask “why” and “who” questions should spur the development of technologies and practices that contribute to improving health outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11948-014-9567-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800448666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800448666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFKAzEQhoMoVqsP4EUKXrysTrJJNnvUUqtQEEo9h006bVO2uzXZIr69WbZKEcRLMiHf_APzEXJF4Y4CZPeB0pyrBChPciGzJD0iZ5RnNBGCy-NYpyJNUi5Yj5yHsAZgQnF5SnqM50wxRc_IeIpYLV2F6F21HDy6eoNzZ4tyMPNFFcqicXUVX1MMWHi7Gny4ZjUYHbSMmpWz4YKcLIoy4OX-7pO3p9Fs-JxMXscvw4dJYgWoJrEqR8ONxUJwyA0zYKmaC5NysDx-ZZyhRCsMiFiBSZVU3C4YA8XE3NC0T2673K2v33cYGr1xwWJZFhXWu6CpAuBcSSn_RzORyRibp_-jMheZiEeL3vxC1_XOxxV1VLtygEjRjrK-DsHjQm-92xT-U1PQrTvdudPRnW7d6Tb5ep-8M1HCT8e3rAiwDgjbdvPoD0b_mfoF9aOiYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695135300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Sunderland, Mary E. ; Nayak, Rahul Uday</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Mary E. ; Nayak, Rahul Uday</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely accepted that translational research practitioners need to acquire special skills and knowledge that will enable them to anticipate, analyze, and manage a range of ethical issues. While there is a small but growing literature that addresses the ethics of translational research, there is a dearth of scholarship regarding how this might apply to engineers. In this paper we examine engineers as key translators and argue that they are well positioned to ask transformative ethical questions. Asking engineers to both broaden and deepen their consideration of ethics in their work, however, requires a shift in the way ethics is often portrayed and perceived in science and engineering communities. Rather than interpreting ethics as a roadblock to the success of translational research, we suggest that engineers should be encouraged to ask questions about the socio-ethical dimensions of their work. This requires expanding the conceptual framework of engineering beyond its traditional focus on “how” and “what” questions to also include “why” and “who” questions to facilitate the gathering of normative, socially-situated information. Empowering engineers to ask “why” and “who” questions should spur the development of technologies and practices that contribute to improving health outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-3452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9567-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24928281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bioengineering - ethics ; Bioethics ; Biomedical engineering ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Communities ; Delivery of Health Care - ethics ; Education ; Engineering ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical ; Ethics, Professional ; Health ; Health Occupations - ethics ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Medicine/Public Health ; Morals ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Professional ethics ; Reengineering ; Science - ethics ; Skills ; Social Norms ; Social Responsibility ; Technology - ethics ; Translational Medical Research ; Translators</subject><ispartof>Science and engineering ethics, 2015-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1019-1031</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12148,27924,27925,33849,33850</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24928281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Rahul Uday</creatorcontrib><title>Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics</title><title>Science and engineering ethics</title><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><description>It is widely accepted that translational research practitioners need to acquire special skills and knowledge that will enable them to anticipate, analyze, and manage a range of ethical issues. While there is a small but growing literature that addresses the ethics of translational research, there is a dearth of scholarship regarding how this might apply to engineers. In this paper we examine engineers as key translators and argue that they are well positioned to ask transformative ethical questions. Asking engineers to both broaden and deepen their consideration of ethics in their work, however, requires a shift in the way ethics is often portrayed and perceived in science and engineering communities. Rather than interpreting ethics as a roadblock to the success of translational research, we suggest that engineers should be encouraged to ask questions about the socio-ethical dimensions of their work. This requires expanding the conceptual framework of engineering beyond its traditional focus on “how” and “what” questions to also include “why” and “who” questions to facilitate the gathering of normative, socially-situated information. Empowering engineers to ask “why” and “who” questions should spur the development of technologies and practices that contribute to improving health outcomes.</description><subject>Bioengineering - ethics</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Ethics, Professional</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Occupations - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Reengineering</subject><subject>Science - ethics</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Social Norms</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Technology - ethics</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research</subject><subject>Translators</subject><issn>1353-3452</issn><issn>1471-5546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFKAzEQhoMoVqsP4EUKXrysTrJJNnvUUqtQEEo9h006bVO2uzXZIr69WbZKEcRLMiHf_APzEXJF4Y4CZPeB0pyrBChPciGzJD0iZ5RnNBGCy-NYpyJNUi5Yj5yHsAZgQnF5SnqM50wxRc_IeIpYLV2F6F21HDy6eoNzZ4tyMPNFFcqicXUVX1MMWHi7Gny4ZjUYHbSMmpWz4YKcLIoy4OX-7pO3p9Fs-JxMXscvw4dJYgWoJrEqR8ONxUJwyA0zYKmaC5NysDx-ZZyhRCsMiFiBSZVU3C4YA8XE3NC0T2673K2v33cYGr1xwWJZFhXWu6CpAuBcSSn_RzORyRibp_-jMheZiEeL3vxC1_XOxxV1VLtygEjRjrK-DsHjQm-92xT-U1PQrTvdudPRnW7d6Tb5ep-8M1HCT8e3rAiwDgjbdvPoD0b_mfoF9aOiYA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Sunderland, Mary E.</creator><creator>Nayak, Rahul Uday</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics</title><author>Sunderland, Mary E. ; Nayak, Rahul Uday</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bioengineering - ethics</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Ethics, Professional</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Occupations - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Reengineering</topic><topic>Science - ethics</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Social Norms</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Technology - ethics</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research</topic><topic>Translators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Rahul Uday</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunderland, Mary E.</au><au>Nayak, Rahul Uday</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics</atitle><jtitle>Science and engineering ethics</jtitle><stitle>Sci Eng Ethics</stitle><addtitle>Sci Eng Ethics</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1019</spage><epage>1031</epage><pages>1019-1031</pages><issn>1353-3452</issn><eissn>1471-5546</eissn><abstract>It is widely accepted that translational research practitioners need to acquire special skills and knowledge that will enable them to anticipate, analyze, and manage a range of ethical issues. While there is a small but growing literature that addresses the ethics of translational research, there is a dearth of scholarship regarding how this might apply to engineers. In this paper we examine engineers as key translators and argue that they are well positioned to ask transformative ethical questions. Asking engineers to both broaden and deepen their consideration of ethics in their work, however, requires a shift in the way ethics is often portrayed and perceived in science and engineering communities. Rather than interpreting ethics as a roadblock to the success of translational research, we suggest that engineers should be encouraged to ask questions about the socio-ethical dimensions of their work. This requires expanding the conceptual framework of engineering beyond its traditional focus on “how” and “what” questions to also include “why” and “who” questions to facilitate the gathering of normative, socially-situated information. Empowering engineers to ask “why” and “who” questions should spur the development of technologies and practices that contribute to improving health outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>24928281</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11948-014-9567-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-3452 |
ispartof | Science and engineering ethics, 2015-08, Vol.21 (4), p.1019-1031 |
issn | 1353-3452 1471-5546 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800448666 |
source | Springer Link; Humanities Index |
subjects | Bioengineering - ethics Bioethics Biomedical engineering Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Communities Delivery of Health Care - ethics Education Engineering Ethics Ethics, Medical Ethics, Professional Health Health Occupations - ethics Humans Knowledge Medicine/Public Health Morals Original Paper Philosophy Philosophy of Science Professional ethics Reengineering Science - ethics Skills Social Norms Social Responsibility Technology - ethics Translational Medical Research Translators |
title | Reengineering Biomedical Translational Research with Engineering Ethics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A19%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reengineering%20Biomedical%20Translational%20Research%20with%20Engineering%20Ethics&rft.jtitle=Science%20and%20engineering%20ethics&rft.au=Sunderland,%20Mary%20E.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1019&rft.epage=1031&rft.pages=1019-1031&rft.issn=1353-3452&rft.eissn=1471-5546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11948-014-9567-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800448666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c89eb4bcea5409b2b0c18d5b340c49eb742e6ec5b0542e0b38684cf220825db13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695135300&rft_id=info:pmid/24928281&rfr_iscdi=true |